NY July 2016 Thread Forum

Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Rahviveh » Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:44 pm

Just wrote:This is collateral but people who don't speak English are totally capable of writing perfect English. Just how English education works in some Asian countries
This post should not be admitted into evidence.

canijustsleep

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:38 am

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by canijustsleep » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:00 pm

On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...

styr

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by styr » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:31 pm

Rahviveh wrote:
Just wrote:This is collateral but people who don't speak English are totally capable of writing perfect English. Just how English education works in some Asian countries
This post should not be admitted into evidence.
True and true. However, it's possible even for people who really suck at writing English (as a second language or natively) to do well on law essays. Spelling and grammar don't usually factor in as long as you have all the logical relationships right. (Edit: This is also too bad, because so many lawyers then have crappy English, and rely on paralegals and others to correct their basic mistakes, but a lot of those people also have crappy English writing skills...You'd think American lawyers would be guardians of good English if that's one of their main tools of the profession, but that's clearly not the case.)
canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
That's the general strategy for family law, even within the rules. It's too bad that didn't show up. This time, the MEE predictor was full of epic fail. I think it only got 3 of the 7 subjects predicted.
Last edited by styr on Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Mr. Peanutbutter

Diamond
Posts: 10168
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Mr. Peanutbutter » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:31 pm

Can we lock this thread?

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:33 pm

canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
I got incredulous over how obviously right the business was. They had so many reasons they were right it was a race against the clock just to list them all. And the main reason they were right was so blatant I felt stupid just writing it.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


whitecollar23

Bronze
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by whitecollar23 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:34 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
I got incredulous over how obviously right the business was. They had so many reasons they were right it was a race against the clock just to list them all. And the main reason they were right was so blatant I felt stupid just writing it.
A "main" reason. I think they were all pretty much main reasons, lol. There were some factors that could militate against them, though. I hope you wrote those and then tried to discredit them.

styr

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by styr » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:37 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
I got incredulous over how obviously right the business was. They had so many reasons they were right it was a race against the clock just to list them all. And the main reason they were right was so blatant I felt stupid just writing it.
I only found 5 of the 9 factors in their favor. I also had counterarguments for a lot of them. It would have been more interesting if there had been 10 (or some even number) of factors.

whitecollar23

Bronze
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by whitecollar23 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:38 pm

styr wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
I got incredulous over how obviously right the business was. They had so many reasons they were right it was a race against the clock just to list them all. And the main reason they were right was so blatant I felt stupid just writing it.
I only found 5 of the 9 factors in their favor. I also had counterarguments for a lot of them. It would have been more interesting if there had been 10 (or some even number) of factors.
In the end, it's really just a matter of the arguments you make and if they make sense. I was able to argue for I think 8 of them to be in their favor and one as neutral. Remember, it was persuasive, so I hope you were able to argue more than just 5 in your brief.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:39 pm

whitecollar23 wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
I got incredulous over how obviously right the business was. They had so many reasons they were right it was a race against the clock just to list them all. And the main reason they were right was so blatant I felt stupid just writing it.
A "main" reason. I think they were all pretty much main reasons, lol. There were some factors that could militate against them, though. I hope you wrote those and then tried to discredit them.
I meant the one related to time and the inherent nature of the business.

Everything else is sort of ancillary.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Mr. Peanutbutter

Diamond
Posts: 10168
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Mr. Peanutbutter » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:40 pm

I wish nothing but bad things on you people

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:41 pm

styr wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
I got incredulous over how obviously right the business was. They had so many reasons they were right it was a race against the clock just to list them all. And the main reason they were right was so blatant I felt stupid just writing it.
I only found 5 of the 9 factors in their favor. I also had counterarguments for a lot of them. It would have been more interesting if there had been 10 (or some even number) of factors.
I had I think six in their favor, one against them, and two as irrelevant. But each of the ones in their favor had about two or three independent supporting facts.

whitecollar23

Bronze
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by whitecollar23 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:41 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
whitecollar23 wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
canijustsleep wrote:On a lighter note:

All of my practical experience is an area where if you're underprepared for an argument, you go emotional and dramatic (it makes complete sense given the area of law, it's a small enough field that I'm not going to identify it) - so that's my instinct.

So, um, I hope whoever grades my green MPT is excited for the most overly dramatic and impassioned defense of that business anyone will likely ever see...
I got incredulous over how obviously right the business was. They had so many reasons they were right it was a race against the clock just to list them all. And the main reason they were right was so blatant I felt stupid just writing it.
A "main" reason. I think they were all pretty much main reasons, lol. There were some factors that could militate against them, though. I hope you wrote those and then tried to discredit them.
I meant the one related to time and the inherent nature of the business.

Everything else is sort of ancillary.

Don't recall what you're referring to. I just know that when I did it, I listed the nine factors and then filled in the relevant facts from his testimony and distinguishable facts from the case, and then just wrote it up.

ellewoods123

Bronze
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:55 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by ellewoods123 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:42 pm

Mlk&Ckies wrote:I wish nothing but bad things on you people

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:50 pm

whitecollar23 wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote: I meant the one related to time and the inherent nature of the business.

Everything else is sort of ancillary.

Don't recall what you're referring to. I just know that when I did it, I listed the nine factors and then filled in the relevant facts from his testimony and distinguishable facts from the case, and then just wrote it up.
Gonna try and not be too specific here--Owing to biology, it would've been impossible for any recently-created business to do the "main thing" they didn't do in that time frame, so a failure to do so doesn't imply anything about motive.

Mr. Peanutbutter

Diamond
Posts: 10168
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Mr. Peanutbutter » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:52 pm

WE GET IT YOU DID WELL ON THE MPT AND THOUGHT HARDER ABOUT IT THAN MOST

ellewoods123

Bronze
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:55 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by ellewoods123 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:53 pm

Mlk&Ckies wrote:WE GET IT YOU DID WELL ON THE MPT AND THOUGHT HARDER ABOUT IT THAN MOST

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Thu Jul 28, 2016 3:03 pm

Mlk&Ckies wrote:WE GET IT YOU DID WELL ON THE MPT AND THOUGHT HARDER ABOUT IT THAN MOST
Not sure what you were expecting people to talk about when you opened this thread.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


whitecollar23

Bronze
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by whitecollar23 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 3:08 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
whitecollar23 wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote: I meant the one related to time and the inherent nature of the business.

Everything else is sort of ancillary.

Don't recall what you're referring to. I just know that when I did it, I listed the nine factors and then filled in the relevant facts from his testimony and distinguishable facts from the case, and then just wrote it up.
Gonna try and not be too specific here--Owing to biology, it would've been impossible for any recently-created business to do the "main thing" they didn't do in that time frame, so a failure to do so doesn't imply anything about motive.
Oh, right. Yeah. I think I wrote that on its own, but also sprinkled that in with the rest of the factors.

canijustsleep

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:38 am

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by canijustsleep » Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:26 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Mlk&Ckies wrote:WE GET IT YOU DID WELL ON THE MPT AND THOUGHT HARDER ABOUT IT THAN MOST
Not sure what you were expecting people to talk about when you opened this thread.
As the original person who brought the MPT up . . . sorry guys. I was just going for a more-fun-than-average story to lighten the mood a bit, but it was totally foreseeable (lol kill me) that it would launch a whole discussion about the details of the thing :shock:

User avatar
MCFC

Platinum
Posts: 9695
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by MCFC » Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:06 pm

I definitely got a little fed up with the whole exercise by the end of MPT 2 and I'm sure it probably showed a bit in my answer. My god, the furniture RECLINES? Checkmate?

User avatar
MCFC

Platinum
Posts: 9695
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by MCFC » Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:18 pm

How does it work when they finally get around to telling us our scores? Email? A big list on a website? (It's public record, I think?)

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
LionelHutzJD

Silver
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by LionelHutzJD » Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:22 pm

MCFC wrote:I definitely got a little fed up with the whole exercise by the end of MPT 2 and I'm sure it probably showed a bit in my answer. My god, the furniture RECLINES? Checkmate?
HAHA. Reclining makes for a better work environment.

just_me

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:34 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by just_me » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:19 pm

Does anyone have any knowledge of when the results are generally released? Any idea whether the transfer to the UBE is likely to have any impact on the timing of results?

ndp1234

Bronze
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 12:30 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by ndp1234 » Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:01 pm

just_me wrote:Does anyone have any knowledge of when the results are generally released? Any idea whether the transfer to the UBE is likely to have any impact on the timing of results?
Usually the last week of October or first week of November. Historically it has been between October 26-November 2. Really hope it being UBE streamlines the grading process.

afarmerfromiowa

New
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 5:50 pm

Re: NY July 2016 Thread

Post by afarmerfromiowa » Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:34 am

I'm surprised it sounds like everyone talked about all 9 factors; I thought several were neutral and kind of ancillary and only addressed the three that were really good for the client and the two that were really bad.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”