California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life) Forum

Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
User avatar
lakers3peat

Bronze
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:10 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by lakers3peat » Fri May 20, 2016 1:19 am

newusername wrote:I'm debating whether to enroll in tutoring/personalized prep program (at $7,100), or go the self-study route again. Does being 22 points away warrant it or should I brave it and self-study? Scores were:

Essay 1: 60/60 60
Essay 2: 65/60 62.5
Essay 3: 60/50 55
Essay 4: 60/60 60
Essay 5: 50/55 52.5
Essay 6: 65/55 60
PT A: 55/65 60
PT B: 60/60 60

Raw Written: 590
Scaled Written 1346
Scaled MBE: 1551

Did worse on the written portion this time around, July 2015 I had a 1421 scaled written.
your substantive knowledge of the law is evident. you need to work on IRAC. hammer that into your freakin brain like theres no tomorrow. depending on how your essays were written, maybe your rule statements and analysis need some work as well since you only have 2 passing essay scores. the PT's also need improvement, I think i passed solely because of my PTs this time. If those were 65s you would probably have too. do a lot less outlining and studying and do a ton more practice essays timed and untimed. at least 5-10 per subject and i guarantee you will pass. 5 pts should suffice, do those all timed. pm me for more details.

i am positive you have this given your scores.

p.s. my scores were virtually identical to yours the same first time i took it. passed second time around.

User avatar
tru

Bronze
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:40 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by tru » Fri May 20, 2016 5:45 pm

lakers3peat wrote:
newusername wrote:I'm debating whether to enroll in tutoring/personalized prep program (at $7,100), or go the self-study route again. Does being 22 points away warrant it or should I brave it and self-study? Scores were:

Essay 1: 60/60 60
Essay 2: 65/60 62.5
Essay 3: 60/50 55
Essay 4: 60/60 60
Essay 5: 50/55 52.5
Essay 6: 65/55 60
PT A: 55/65 60
PT B: 60/60 60

Raw Written: 590
Scaled Written 1346
Scaled MBE: 1551

Did worse on the written portion this time around, July 2015 I had a 1421 scaled written.
your substantive knowledge of the law is evident. you need to work on IRAC. hammer that into your freakin brain like theres no tomorrow. depending on how your essays were written, maybe your rule statements and analysis need some work as well since you only have 2 passing essay scores. the PT's also need improvement, I think i passed solely because of my PTs this time. If those were 65s you would probably have too. do a lot less outlining and studying and do a ton more practice essays timed and untimed. at least 5-10 per subject and i guarantee you will pass. 5 pts should suffice, do those all timed. pm me for more details.

i am positive you have this given your scores.

p.s. my scores were virtually identical to yours the same first time i took it. passed second time around.
+1 to feedback above. That scoresheet reeks of IRAC problem. There's no black letter law problem. Fortunately, learning how to IRAC is sure as hell easier than learning the BLL

User avatar
cleanhustle

New
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 7:14 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by cleanhustle » Fri May 20, 2016 9:02 pm

lakers3peat wrote:
newusername wrote:I'm debating whether to enroll in tutoring/personalized prep program (at $7,100), or go the self-study route again. Does being 22 points away warrant it or should I brave it and self-study? Scores were:

Essay 1: 60/60 60
Essay 2: 65/60 62.5
Essay 3: 60/50 55
Essay 4: 60/60 60
Essay 5: 50/55 52.5
Essay 6: 65/55 60
PT A: 55/65 60
PT B: 60/60 60

Raw Written: 590
Scaled Written 1346
Scaled MBE: 1551

Did worse on the written portion this time around, July 2015 I had a 1421 scaled written.
your substantive knowledge of the law is evident. you need to work on IRAC. hammer that into your freakin brain like theres no tomorrow. depending on how your essays were written, maybe your rule statements and analysis need some work as well since you only have 2 passing essay scores. the PT's also need improvement, I think i passed solely because of my PTs this time. If those were 65s you would probably have too. do a lot less outlining and studying and do a ton more practice essays timed and untimed. at least 5-10 per subject and i guarantee you will pass. 5 pts should suffice, do those all timed. pm me for more details.

i am positive you have this given your scores.

p.s. my scores were virtually identical to yours the same first time i took it. passed second time around.


When you practice your essays, how do you go about improving? I know it's such a vague Q but I've been working on essays and am having a tough time for some reason.

FinallyPassedTheBar

Bronze
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:27 am

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by FinallyPassedTheBar » Sat May 21, 2016 12:27 am

I am assuming this IRAC thing is a lot different than IRAC in law school? Because that's how i wrote essays in law school.

Anyhow, I will post my essays here once they get mailed back to me.

User avatar
rcharter1978

Gold
Posts: 4740
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:49 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by rcharter1978 » Sat May 21, 2016 3:38 am

6TimeFailure wrote:I am assuming this IRAC thing is a lot different than IRAC in law school? Because that's how i wrote essays in law school.

Anyhow, I will post my essays here once they get mailed back to me.
I think thats an excellent question/point. I think in law school I very loosely IRAC'd, I wasn't as disciplined about it as I should have been and I didn't really stick to a formula. I would also sometimes get a little long winded if I was trying to cover the fact that I didn't really know something...or if I was trying to make a creative argument. And I wrote a lot more in my analysis section.

I think you have to be a lot more structured with your IRAC on the bar exam, and you have to get to the point faster because a reader is only giving your paper like 3 minutes and they don't care about your creative arguments (or I don't think they do).

When I worked with the tutor (who was a former bar grader) he was very focused on keeping that structure, and keeping everything brief and getting to the point. AND, he focused a lot on how much time you would give for an issue. If an issue was obvious, or sort of an introductory issue (like saying what contracts are governed by the UCC) you give it almost no time. But for issues that were debatable you gave them a little more time (and for him, you never gave anything as much analysis as I wanted). He also stressed taking out unnecessary words.....one of his pet peeves is when I would do an analysis with "A would argue X......B would counter argue Y." He felt like those words were a waste of time and space. But thats what I did in law school....and I did well in law school.

So, I guess the IRAC for the bar maybe just has to be like a more extreme version of the law school IRAC....I think?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
tru

Bronze
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:40 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by tru » Sat May 21, 2016 12:19 pm

IRAC is exactly the same as you would in law school. The best way to improve on the essays are by doing a lot of practice/outlining and reading model answers. Try to replicate/mimic someone better than you.

User avatar
cleanhustle

New
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 7:14 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by cleanhustle » Sat May 21, 2016 12:49 pm

rcharter1978 wrote:
6TimeFailure wrote:I am assuming this IRAC thing is a lot different than IRAC in law school? Because that's how i wrote essays in law school.

Anyhow, I will post my essays here once they get mailed back to me.
He also stressed taking out unnecessary words.....one of his pet peeves is when I would do an analysis with "A would argue X......B would counter argue Y." He felt like those words were a waste of time and space. But thats what I did in law school....and I did well in law school.
What did he want you to do instead of stating that "X would argue... Y would counter-argue"?

User avatar
rcharter1978

Gold
Posts: 4740
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:49 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by rcharter1978 » Sat May 21, 2016 1:26 pm

cleanhustle wrote:
rcharter1978 wrote:
6TimeFailure wrote:I am assuming this IRAC thing is a lot different than IRAC in law school? Because that's how i wrote essays in law school.

Anyhow, I will post my essays here once they get mailed back to me.
He also stressed taking out unnecessary words.....one of his pet peeves is when I would do an analysis with "A would argue X......B would counter argue Y." He felt like those words were a waste of time and space. But thats what I did in law school....and I did well in law school.
What did he want you to do instead of stating that "X would argue... Y would counter-argue"?
It was weird, he would just want me to make the arguments without introducing it....like "C went to the gym first, but it didn't matter because Y already used the weights" instead of "C would argue the she went to the first, but Y would counter that he had already used the weights."

User avatar
a male human

Gold
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by a male human » Sat May 21, 2016 2:09 pm

If I may possibly offer my humble input when you guys have a moment, I would appreciate the time taken to read this post and perhaps see my point that... you don't need to do the ping-pong argument every time. You can if there is a valid argument for the other side that calls out to you.

Can someone go to BarEssays right now and pick out a few 70-level essay answers and see how many have ping-pong arguments?

You are ultimately supposed to take a stand (the C part of IRAC), and the bulk of your application should just be straight-up: take your rule, apply it over the facts like butter, have a taste, then make a conclusion. There should be a "right" answer, like in the MBE. It also saves you time.

Put another way, IRAC on bar essays (not PTs) is not necessarily the same as IRAC in law school.

Why? The A here is more like "application" whereas the A in law school is more like "analysis" (where you do want to analyze different angles and show the prof you know how to make an objective argument).

Does this mean...? Yes! When your PT asks you to provide an objective memo (cf. persuasive memo), you should do the ping pong.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
rcharter1978

Gold
Posts: 4740
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:49 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by rcharter1978 » Sat May 21, 2016 2:24 pm

a male human wrote:If I may possibly offer my humble input when you guys have a moment, I would appreciate the time taken to read this post and perhaps see my point that... you don't need to do the ping-pong argument every time. You can if there is a valid argument for the other side that calls out to you.

Can someone go to BarEssays right now and pick out a few 70-level essay answers and see how many have ping-pong arguments?

You are ultimately supposed to take a stand (the C part of IRAC), and the bulk of your application should just be straight-up: take your rule, apply it over the facts like butter, have a taste, then make a conclusion. There should be a "right" answer, like in the MBE. It also saves you time.

Put another way, IRAC on bar essays (not PTs) is not necessarily the same as IRAC in law school.

Why? The A here is more like "application" whereas the A in law school is more like "analysis" (where you do want to analyze different angles and show the prof you know how to make an objective argument).

Does this mean...? Yes! When your PT asks you to provide an objective memo (cf. persuasive memo), you should do the ping pong.

Yeah, that was the impression I got from the tutor. But its natural from years of law school (for me) to want to do a full ping pong analysis. The tutor was having none....of.....that.

Rap Genius

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 2:56 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Rap Genius » Sat May 21, 2016 3:14 pm

Hey anybody care to annotate February Question 1? I don't know if you guys have ever stumbled across Rap Genius but I think it could work out if we all chime in on the essays. Some of Barbri's and Kaplan's essay examples are kinda bad. If we can instead create our model examples together (since we are experts outside of the bar), we can have the best model answers freely accessible.

http://genius.com/The-state-bar-of-cali ... -annotated

Rap Genius

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 2:56 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Rap Genius » Sat May 21, 2016 3:17 pm

Since most of you took the February bar, I figured you would have some good input. I also posted some other essays on Rap Genius and I'll put some more up.

Good luck for those repeating July, I'll be taking it with you.

Rap Genius

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 2:56 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Rap Genius » Sat May 21, 2016 3:47 pm

Ok guys, there's one more that I posted on Civil Procedure. If you guys have any essays you want me to post I can do that for you later today and we can start working on bar essays.

http://genius.com/The-state-bar-of-cali ... -annotated

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Nybar2015

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:13 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Nybar2015 » Sun May 22, 2016 9:08 pm

6TimeFailure wrote:I am assuming this IRAC thing is a lot different than IRAC in law school? Because that's how i wrote essays in law school.

Anyhow, I will post my essays here once they get mailed back to me.

I am sorry that you didn't get through. Your mbe scores are really good. You just need to improve on essays n trust me that's not hard. Just go through all essays in barbri essay book..I mean just memorise them.You would know how to answer and how much to write to score maximum.

Even I struggled essays (NY bar not CA) but barbri essay book really helped me. when you practice all past 10yrs essays you would realise that most of them are repeated. I personally felt 70% were repeated issues this feb 2016.

So just practice barbri essays. Trust me scoring mbe is tougher than essays. You can do it.

LAWLADI2011

New
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:09 am

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by LAWLADI2011 » Mon May 23, 2016 12:18 am

I passed the CA bar on the first try. :D

I used a tutor for PT's and Essays. I worked until the last week in January then took the rest of time off. I practiced as many essays as I could along with PT's. The school tutor told me to make sure I was practicing at the times of the exam and I did this a few times but I felt like that was a waste of time. I'm a morning person so focusing in the morning was not a problem for me but I know myself well enough to feel comfortable doing this. I did practice the mbe's in succession because I had a harder time with Mbe's.

I know that people want to hear that you don't have to study hard to pass and perhaps that was true for some people but I really studied hard. I wrote essays and pt's until my hands hurt and then I put it down and studied the law. I wrote until I could look at fact patterns and see issues easily. Most importantly I used IRAC on every issue- no deviation at all. I used baressays to check my answers and realized I was spotting a lot of issues that others missed. I didn't tailor my essay responses to the bare minimum; if I saw an issue I wrote about it because I wanted the extra points. The law school offered feedback for 4-5 exams and I wrote all of them and turned them in plus the work that my tutor assigned and I did the rest on my own.

I struggled on the MBE's. I failed every barbri test-miserably. My numbers were around 40% or less. I used Adaptibar and my numbers were around 57%. I thought for sure that I would fail the test prior to taking it because of the MBE portion. I did at the end start to print off all the questions that I missed and read over them. It was tedious but I started to get more questions correct.

On the day of the exam I never felt nervous once. Repetition on the essays and pt's eliminated my anxiety. I walked out of the MBE unsure of how I did but I felt confident that I passed the exam. You don't have to be brilliant to pass the bar but practicing is vital. IRAC is vital. Just learning the law is not enough.

Hope this helps.

User avatar
a male human

Gold
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by a male human » Mon May 23, 2016 12:29 am

LAWLADI2011 wrote:Repetition on the essays and pt's eliminated my anxiety. I walked out of the MBE unsure of how I did but I felt confident that I passed the exam. You don't have to be brilliant to pass the bar but practicing is vital. IRAC is vital. Just learning the law is not enough.
I think this is key. The bar will knock you down a few pegs. Developing enough "muscle memory" to prevent panic under pressure and having enough of a buffer to still perform at minimum competence appears to be worth a significant number of points. Even more important is practicing applying the law instead of merely memorizing rules, knowing the rules in theory, or being familiar with the rules.

User avatar
lacrossebrother

Platinum
Posts: 7150
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:15 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by lacrossebrother » Mon May 23, 2016 8:31 am

When does the public list get posted?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


longhornlaw

Bronze
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:40 am

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by longhornlaw » Mon May 23, 2016 9:19 am

cleanhustle wrote:
lakers3peat wrote:
newusername wrote:I'm debating whether to enroll in tutoring/personalized prep program (at $7,100), or go the self-study route again. Does being 22 points away warrant it or should I brave it and self-study? Scores were:

Essay 1: 60/60 60
Essay 2: 65/60 62.5
Essay 3: 60/50 55
Essay 4: 60/60 60
Essay 5: 50/55 52.5
Essay 6: 65/55 60
PT A: 55/65 60
PT B: 60/60 60

Raw Written: 590
Scaled Written 1346
Scaled MBE: 1551

Did worse on the written portion this time around, July 2015 I had a 1421 scaled written.
your substantive knowledge of the law is evident. you need to work on IRAC. hammer that into your freakin brain like theres no tomorrow. depending on how your essays were written, maybe your rule statements and analysis need some work as well since you only have 2 passing essay scores. the PT's also need improvement, I think i passed solely because of my PTs this time. If those were 65s you would probably have too. do a lot less outlining and studying and do a ton more practice essays timed and untimed. at least 5-10 per subject and i guarantee you will pass. 5 pts should suffice, do those all timed. pm me for more details.

i am positive you have this given your scores.

p.s. my scores were virtually identical to yours the same first time i took it. passed second time around.


When you practice your essays, how do you go about improving? I know it's such a vague Q but I've been working on essays and am having a tough time for some reason.
Use headings. Bold, underline, numbers. You can almost get away with outlines for your essays.

For the analysis part, each sentence should basically go like this: this "element of the rule" is present, because "this fact from the fact pattern" happened, showing "element of the rule". Be incredibly basic. No fluff.

Abbie Doobie

Silver
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:02 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Abbie Doobie » Mon May 23, 2016 11:47 am

lacrossebrother wrote:When does the public list get posted?
it doesn't anymore:
Cal Bar News Release wrote:Effective with this administration of the examination, the list of successful applicants will not be released to the public in compliance with the limitations imposed by the new Business and Professions Code section 6026.11, which makes the State Bar subject to the California Public Records Act, and the associated Admissions statute (B&P Code § 6060.25), which prohibits the release of information regarding bar admission applicants. Test-takers may log on to see whether their names appear on the pass list.
http://www.calbar.ca.gov/AboutUs/News/T ... 01625.aspx

minkylowlife

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:27 am

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by minkylowlife » Mon May 23, 2016 12:22 pm

I basically used MadLibs for my IRAC.

"The issue here is ____. The rule is [element one, element two, element three]. In this situation, [element one] and [element 2] satisfied because [fact], but [element 3] is not because [fact]. Plaintiff may argue [fact] satisfies [element three], but Defendant will counter that [fact] doesn't satisfy [element three] because [fact]. Thus, Defendant can show that Plaintiff has not satisfied the rule and Defendant is not liable."

in practice

"The issue here is whether Defendant can be held strictly liable for failure to warn about a danger of the product. The rule for strict liability for inadequate warning is that the product had potential substantial risks that Defendant knew or should have known about, that the ordinary consumer could not foresee those risks, that there was no adequate warning, and that the lack of adequate warning caused real harm to the plaintiff. Plaintiff will argue that all elements of the rule are satisfied because Defendant sold a medication to which there is a risk of allergic reaction and that Defendant knew carried that risk. In this case, the ordinary consumer would not expect a major allergic reaction. However, in this case, Defendant will prevail because Plaintiff's injury was not caused by an allergic reaction, but by an intentional overdose, which means that the failure to warn did not cause the injury. Thus, because the failure to warn did not cause the injury, Plaintiff fails to satisfy the elements of a strict liability claim for failure to warn."

And every time I brought up an issue I copy-pasted the rule. I had the definition for hearsay five times in my evidence essay.

Zaizei

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Zaizei » Mon May 23, 2016 6:42 pm

Hi guys. This will be my third time sitting for the bar exam and I want some advice. The first time I went with Barbri, but I feel that I lacked on proper practice for the essays and pt portion. The second time I had a tutor... Which taught me a lot, but his strategy was not right (I only improved 4 points)... This time I want to study by myself, focus on the written portion, since my score in the MBE was a decent one. Also, I got a 75 on the first essay of the feb examination, but got terrible grades on the other ones...

Just so you can give me a better advice, here are my grades:

Essay 1 - 75
Essay 2 - 55
Essay 3 - 55
Essay 4 - 50
Essay 5 - 50
Essay 6 - 55
PT A - 60
PT B - 55
Scaled MBE - 1464

I need to know a reliable web that provides essays and that provide some kind of graders, since I want someone to grade my essays. As well, I need a reliable web for MBE questions, since I want to keep practicing just in case. For the PTs I'll be reading old ones. What do you think? Is this a good strategy?

Thanks!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


vingonza

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:05 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by vingonza » Mon May 23, 2016 7:18 pm

All the advice here is awesome, so I thought I would add something that I haven't seen suggested yet that I did differently this time around. I wrote my essays and PTs with the intent of making it easier for the graders to see that I hit every element of each rule and utilized each element within the analysis.

More specifically, In addition to the traditional headers, I underlined each word that I wanted the grader to see throughout my answers. What I think was key to being able to successfully do this was teaching myself the habit of underlining and bolding words as I was typing rather than trying to go back and underline and clean up after the essay was finished. I got to the point where I was able to underline and bold important words/elements I wanted to make sure the grader would see while being able to maintain my normal typing speed. It became second nature.

There definitely is a fine line between being able to underline the words that will net you points and over-underlining. I pretty much underlined the elements in the rules and again underlined the elements in the analysis to show correlation between the rule and analysis.

There is series called "Nailing the Bar" by this dude named Tim Tyler. I got his "How to Write Essay Answers for Law School and Bar Exams" and "How to Write Performance Tests". I was desperate for any extra tips on performance test writing since that was what killed me the first time around. There aren't all that many books dedicated to it, so I tried these books and was pleasantly surprised as some of the suggestions it had. It placed an emphasis on making the bar grader's job "easy". I tried some of the tricks, such as underlining and it worked for me, so I thought I would share.

Cheers

Right in Two

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 6:42 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Right in Two » Mon May 23, 2016 7:58 pm

Hi All,

Long time lurker and first time poster. I passed the bar on my second try after falling well short last time.

July 2015 scores: E1- 65, E2- 65, E3- 55, E4- 55, E5 - 55, E6 - 50, PTA - 50, PTB - 55
Scaled MBE - 1452
Scaled total- 1324

Study tools:
Tutor - 1 session to go over 3 of my essays
BarEssays Premium (the model answers are KEY. Also, I'm not a paid spokesperson)
Barbri (StudySmart MBEs and occasionally looked at CMR. I watched all the lectures the first time, so I mostly skipped them the second time)

Study strategy:

Essays
I was only able to get one session with a tutor due to procrastination on my part. He agreed to review 3 of my essays from July and I sent him my 3 55s. We discussed both what I did well and where I made mistakes in addition to my mental state during the exam.

I then went to BarEssays and printed nearly all the essays they had for each subject, thereby creating a property "packet", a con law "packet", etc, and each packet having 10-15 essays. I would then study in 3-5 hour blocks, staying in one subject per block and outlining/reviewing about 1 essay per hour. When I outlined, I would issue spot with a highlighter and then type out every rule that was relevant. When I reviewed, I would compare my outline to the model answer, type out every rule I missed, and read the analysis. The BarEssays model answers really helped me because they use the same rule statement every time. After missing the rules a couple of times and having to retype them, I had them memorized.

As I got deeper into each subject packet, the essays became easier to outline because of repeat issues. Reviewing also became easier because I had to retype less rules since I was getting them right on the outline. I only wrote out one essay for each of the 7 MBE subjects (although I wrote out 50 essays in prep for July). A few days before the test, I re-outlined the July 2015 essays and then laughed about how much I missed when I read over my old answers, even the 65s.

During the test, I made sure to IRAC every issue. The rule statements were mostly easy because I just replicated the rule statements that I had typed out over and over again while studying.

MBE
So my MBE score was not stellar, but it was passing. I recognized that there was not a huge amount of value to be added here, so I worked on maintenance. I had free Barbri for the repeat and I worked on the harder questions (StudySmart 5 and 6 for each subject) and reviewed the answers carefully. The harder questions teach you both the general rule and the finer limitations, so you can learn two rules at once. Additionally, i bought strategies and tactics (2012) and did several questions and took the practice MBE under real test conditions. I also actively reviewed the practice test, so I could think about each question twice.

On the day of the test, the MBE seemed pretty old hat. I could understand what most of the questions were asking for and could easily eliminate wrong answers even if I was unsure of the right answer.

PTs
I'm not a super speedy worker or writer, so I felt that the PTs were my greatest weakness. I wrote out about 4 full PTs and outlined, either entirely or partially, about 8 or so others. Additionally, I read the released answers from nearly all the PTs I attempted, taking note of the organizational structure and comparing them to my own.

On test day I made sure to organize the rules under the appropriate headings (four headings for each PT, if I recall) and then go through and fill in the facts for each rule. Still felt like my weakest section and I ran out of time on PTB, but my answer definitely looked better.

Hope this helps and good luck to those studying for July!!

CAbarexamtaker

New
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 1:15 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by CAbarexamtaker » Wed May 25, 2016 2:36 pm

Zaizei wrote:Hi guys. This will be my third time sitting for the bar exam and I want some advice. The first time I went with Barbri, but I feel that I lacked on proper practice for the essays and pt portion. The second time I had a tutor... Which taught me a lot, but his strategy was not right (I only improved 4 points)... This time I want to study by myself, focus on the written portion, since my score in the MBE was a decent one. Also, I got a 75 on the first essay of the feb examination, but got terrible grades on the other ones...

Just so you can give me a better advice, here are my grades:

Essay 1 - 75
Essay 2 - 55
Essay 3 - 55
Essay 4 - 50
Essay 5 - 50
Essay 6 - 55
PT A - 60
PT B - 55
Scaled MBE - 1464

I need to know a reliable web that provides essays and that provide some kind of graders, since I want someone to grade my essays. As well, I need a reliable web for MBE questions, since I want to keep practicing just in case. For the PTs I'll be reading old ones. What do you think? Is this a good strategy?

Thanks!
Kaplan's essay grading service is a huge part of why I passed the second time. The other main part is advice I got about becoming robotic about IRAC. I think they have a good essay service and I really like their MBE stuff. It's kind of expensive, though. Maybe a tutor would provide limited review cheaper? Or a professor?

Zaizei

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: California February 2016 Bar Exam (Westside For Life)

Post by Zaizei » Sat May 28, 2016 8:21 am

Hi! Do you guys know a good web page to buy good MBE questions to practice (that provides full explained answers for the 4 options)? Thanks :)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”