myrtlewinston wrote:My Torts essay has been graded, but the comments are not showing up. I'm using a Mac. Any suggestions? Thanks!
go into "review" then mess around until you see options for show comments, etc...
myrtlewinston wrote:My Torts essay has been graded, but the comments are not showing up. I'm using a Mac. Any suggestions? Thanks!
The guy or girl who graded my essay left some pretty hilarious comments . But I was two points from a passing score. Meh. I guessvictortsoi wrote:myrtlewinston wrote:My Torts essay has been graded, but the comments are not showing up. I'm using a Mac. Any suggestions? Thanks!
go into "review" then mess around until you see options for show comments, etc...
I clicked on the essay assignment link and then on the "review" button. Nothing. I've e-mailed Barbri. Thanks, though.victortsoi wrote:myrtlewinston wrote:My Torts essay has been graded, but the comments are not showing up. I'm using a Mac. Any suggestions? Thanks!
go into "review" then mess around until you see options for show comments, etc...
I'm still figuring it out . I started to write the distinctions on the blank side of my critical pass cards but idk ? Some of the rules are so long they don't fit . I might have to put them on regular flash cards . Interesting enough, Themis has the best outlines. My friend sent me his Themis outlines and they literally have the NY distinctions next to the common law rule . I have no idea why Barbri makes you go to the middle of the CMR.Notmyfavbar wrote:How is everyone weaving in the NY rules/distinctions for the MBE subjects? reading over the shit once just doesn't cut it for me.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
bmonroe wrote:I'm still figuring it out . I started to write the distinctions on the blank side of my critical pass cards but idk ? Some of the rules are so long they don't fit . I might have to put them on regular flash cards . Interesting enough, Themis has the best outlines. My friend sent me his Themis outlines and they literally have the NY distinctions next to the common law rule . I have no idea why Barbri makes you go to the middle of the CMR.Notmyfavbar wrote:How is everyone weaving in the NY rules/distinctions for the MBE subjects? reading over the shit once just doesn't cut it for me.
I'm definitely memorizing, but I learn a lot better through practical application, so I do a lot of MBEs and then read all the explanations, whether I got them right or wrong, and I also read why ALL the other wrong answers to see WHY they are wrong. the MBE is almost like a giant LSAT, so learning how they try to trick is perfect in trying to boost your score. I've gone from 40% to 80% in 2 weeks on ConLaw, CivPro, Contracts, and TortsNotmyfavbar wrote:bmonroe wrote:I'm still figuring it out . I started to write the distinctions on the blank side of my critical pass cards but idk ? Some of the rules are so long they don't fit . I might have to put them on regular flash cards . Interesting enough, Themis has the best outlines. My friend sent me his Themis outlines and they literally have the NY distinctions next to the common law rule . I have no idea why Barbri makes you go to the middle of the CMR.Notmyfavbar wrote:How is everyone weaving in the NY rules/distinctions for the MBE subjects? reading over the shit once just doesn't cut it for me.
Same, I started to write out some distinctions on the critical pass cards after torts. That was taking too long...and it was taking me ages to go through the MBE material so NY seemed to be impossible to touch. It's a big effin mess. I'm thinking that at some point in time I'll just have to make them into sep notecards now?
Anyone else feel like you should be memorizing right now?
I was finally able to read the comments today (updated my software). Grader took points off because I didn't state the elements of negligence a second time. This is even though I wrote "see above for elements." Not very pleased with Barbri today. Rant over.victortsoi wrote:myrtlewinston wrote:My Torts essay has been graded, but the comments are not showing up. I'm using a Mac. Any suggestions? Thanks!
go into "review" then mess around until you see options for show comments, etc...
myrtlewinston wrote:Do you have any advice on learning New York Practice?northwood wrote:jamesm722 wrote:I'm taking Pieper and the lectures are either 4 hours or 6 hours. Then they assign about 50 pages of reading and 30 questions a night on top of reviewing notes. They should just change their slogan to Pieper People Panic.
I used Pieper last summer (and passed). Never read one of those cases that they assigned- instead I read the outline, outlined an essay or two after the lecture and spent the rest of the time drilling MBE questions (got the Strategies and Tactics book and used Adapitbar). Spent most of my time memorizing the mnemonics and making sure I understood the concepts behind it. When it came time to hone in on memorization in the last few weeks I studied primarily off the mnemonic sheets- and used my lecture outline/ books only when I was totally stumped.
By the way Pieper People Do Pass!!
myrtlewinston wrote:Thanks for the advice! Did you make an outline or did you use the Pieper mnemonics solely? Good call to practise NYP in the essays.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
This all sounds incredibly excessivenorthwood wrote:myrtlewinston wrote:Thanks for the advice! Did you make an outline or did you use the Pieper mnemonics solely? Good call to practise NYP in the essays.
I condensed the main outline as I went through it. When I honed in on memorization- I primarily used Pieper mnemonics but added to them with my own notes to enhance my understanding. I then focused on memorizing all of the mnemonics once the class ended ( I went ahead so I had an extra 3 days to memorize in July). It really wasn't that bad- I just divided the course into number of subjects/ days left and drilled each subject and outlined essays. Made sure to do at least 50 MBE questions/ day starting in mid June (had to adjust my approach by removing review materials after class ended to compensate and extended my time studying per day).
BY the way I highly recommend handwriting at least 2 full essays in a row with no breaks. I also recommend taking one day and devoting it to essay writing (good way to solidiy your knowledge and gain experience into what it is like to have to write 3 essays in a row with no break, take a 45 minute lunch break, then do 2 essays and a MPT with no break- and a hard time allotment.. i.e. Day 1 of the exam minus NY MC. and then doing 100 MBE questions in 3 hours, a 45 minute break and then 100 more in 3 hours... But do this relatively early (end of June/ before 4th of JUly so you wont get discouraged) Due to a computer malfunction I ended up having to handwrite the exam ( luckily it died before the exam started) so luckily I was able to recognize the essay prompt, similarities in the fact pattern and was able to recall how above average answers responded so I just basically started writing off that and used the facts to support my analysis (only was able to do this because I outlined at least 2 essays a day starting around this time).
FWIW I ended up finishing all of the essays (albeit with seconds to spare) and most importantly passed.
Y'all can do this.. Remember essays are 40%, MBE is 40%, NYM is 10% and MPT is 10%... a solid MPT is better than 1 essay (each essay is approx. 8% of your score) AND THERE IS NO MINIMUM TO PASS EACH SUBJECT, JUST NEED A 665+ to pass
Thanks, Northwood. I'm watching the lectures first, so that the black letter law has time to sink in. July (and the last part of June) is reserved for practise.northwood wrote:myrtlewinston wrote:Thanks for the advice! Did you make an outline or did you use the Pieper mnemonics solely? Good call to practise NYP in the essays.
I condensed the main outline as I went through it. When I honed in on memorization- I primarily used Pieper mnemonics but added to them with my own notes to enhance my understanding. I then focused on memorizing all of the mnemonics once the class ended ( I went ahead so I had an extra 3 days to memorize in July). It really wasn't that bad- I just divided the course into number of subjects/ days left and drilled each subject and outlined essays. Made sure to do at least 50 MBE questions/ day starting in mid June (had to adjust my approach by removing review materials after class ended to compensate and extended my time studying per day).
BY the way I highly recommend handwriting at least 2 full essays in a row with no breaks. I also recommend taking one day and devoting it to essay writing (good way to solidiy your knowledge and gain experience into what it is like to have to write 3 essays in a row with no break, take a 45 minute lunch break, then do 2 essays and a MPT with no break- and a hard time allotment.. i.e. Day 1 of the exam minus NY MC. and then doing 100 MBE questions in 3 hours, a 45 minute break and then 100 more in 3 hours... But do this relatively early (end of June/ before 4th of JUly so you wont get discouraged) Due to a computer malfunction I ended up having to handwrite the exam ( luckily it died before the exam started) so luckily I was able to recognize the essay prompt, similarities in the fact pattern and was able to recall how above average answers responded so I just basically started writing off that and used the facts to support my analysis (only was able to do this because I outlined at least 2 essays a day starting around this time).
FWIW I ended up finishing all of the essays (albeit with seconds to spare) and most importantly passed.
Y'all can do this.. Remember essays are 40%, MBE is 40%, NYM is 10% and MPT is 10%... a solid MPT is better than 1 essay (each essay is approx. 8% of your score) AND THERE IS NO MINIMUM TO PASS EACH SUBJECT, JUST NEED A 665+ to pass
Danger Zone wrote:northwood wrote:This all sounds incredibly excessivemyrtlewinston wrote:Thanks for the advice! Did you make an outline or did you use the Pieper mnemonics solely? Good call to practise NYP in the essays.
This is a great idea. Granted, I took a course in law school completely dedicated to taking MPTs ( writing for the practice of law ) but I should consider doing essays and MPT back to back. The horror.northwood wrote:myrtlewinston wrote:Thanks for the advice! Did you make an outline or did you use the Pieper mnemonics solely? Good call to practise NYP in the essays.
I condensed the main outline as I went through it. When I honed in on memorization- I primarily used Pieper mnemonics but added to them with my own notes to enhance my understanding. I then focused on memorizing all of the mnemonics once the class ended ( I went ahead so I had an extra 3 days to memorize in July). It really wasn't that bad- I just divided the course into number of subjects/ days left and drilled each subject and outlined essays. Made sure to do at least 50 MBE questions/ day starting in mid June (had to adjust my approach by removing review materials after class ended to compensate and extended my time studying per day).
BY the way I highly recommend handwriting at least 2 full essays in a row with no breaks. I also recommend taking one day and devoting it to essay writing (good way to solidiy your knowledge and gain experience into what it is like to have to write 3 essays in a row with no break, take a 45 minute lunch break, then do 2 essays and a MPT with no break- and a hard time allotment.. i.e. Day 1 of the exam minus NY MC. and then doing 100 MBE questions in 3 hours, a 45 minute break and then 100 more in 3 hours... But do this relatively early (end of June/ before 4th of JUly so you wont get discouraged) Due to a computer malfunction I ended up having to handwrite the exam ( luckily it died before the exam started) so luckily I was able to recognize the essay prompt, similarities in the fact pattern and was able to recall how above average answers responded so I just basically started writing off that and used the facts to support my analysis (only was able to do this because I outlined at least 2 essays a day starting around this time).
FWIW I ended up finishing all of the essays (albeit with seconds to spare) and most importantly passed.
Y'all can do this.. Remember essays are 40%, MBE is 40%, NYM is 10% and MPT is 10%... a solid MPT is better than 1 essay (each essay is approx. 8% of your score) AND THERE IS NO MINIMUM TO PASS EACH SUBJECT, JUST NEED A 665+ to pass
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Good questions . I take the lecture notes but barbri always test on stuff the lectures didnt cover .Notmyfavbar wrote:Barbri people - Is everyone using the lecture notes primarily... and supplementing them with the CMR? I relied on the CMR in the beginning but it def takes a lot more time to go through that once than to rely on the lecture notes. Also, I know some instructors told us to rely on the lecture notes for specific classes... BUT def doesn't feel right to not go through the CMR.
Btdubs.. the NY Practice lecture notes... wtf.
Whats wrong with the ny practice lecture notes other than that they are super long and boring?Notmyfavbar wrote:Barbri people - Is everyone using the lecture notes primarily... and supplementing them with the CMR? I relied on the CMR in the beginning but it def takes a lot more time to go through that once than to rely on the lecture notes. Also, I know some instructors told us to rely on the lecture notes for specific classes... BUT def doesn't feel right to not go through the CMR.
Btdubs.. the NY Practice lecture notes... wtf.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I find them complete and clear, like his Evidence notes. But, they are boring and long.scaliaantics wrote:Whats wrong with the ny practice lecture notes other than that they are super long and boring?Notmyfavbar wrote:Barbri people - Is everyone using the lecture notes primarily... and supplementing them with the CMR? I relied on the CMR in the beginning but it def takes a lot more time to go through that once than to rely on the lecture notes. Also, I know some instructors told us to rely on the lecture notes for specific classes... BUT def doesn't feel right to not go through the CMR. Btdubs.. the NY Practice lecture notes... wtf.
myrtlewinston wrote:I find them complete and clear, like his Evidence notes. But, they are boring and long.scaliaantics wrote:Whats wrong with the ny practice lecture notes other than that they are super long and boring?Notmyfavbar wrote:Barbri people - Is everyone using the lecture notes primarily... and supplementing them with the CMR? I relied on the CMR in the beginning but it def takes a lot more time to go through that once than to rely on the lecture notes. Also, I know some instructors told us to rely on the lecture notes for specific classes... BUT def doesn't feel right to not go through the CMR. Btdubs.. the NY Practice lecture notes... wtf.
Congratulations on passing 2 very difficult Bar exams!ashle484 wrote:I also would't waste time studying/practicing for NY mc. I had never looked at an NY mc question going into the exam, and I passed. If you study NY law sufficiently, the questions are easy.
Also, similar to the sentiments expressed above, I would dedicate your time to going through as many essays as possible and at the very least issue spot. I'm next to positive doing that is why I passed in Feb, because I had barely any time to dedicate to all the NY specific law since I was working full time. I should note that I was coming off of the California bar, which helped me out with the MBE, but still essay practice was key.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login