Does anybody know what a 75 looks like? Im self studying and the materials i have dont include that. Does barbri/kaplan release what 75 looks like? What are the model answers the bar released?ap1987 wrote:tycoga8118 wrote:So, as I understand it, to pass the NV bar we must have a weighted total score of 75? And have received a minimum score of 75 on at least 3 of the essays? Is that right? If so, what exactly does that mean? I'm pretty confused how everything would be calculated (like how one MBE score translates versus another and what essays are graded out of anyways...how hard is it to get a minimum 75?) Anybody know?
I believe the essays are graded out of 100.
I'm taking Barbri and I asked this question. Here are the responses I got:
"As far as scoring on the essay is concerned, you need to score a minimum of 75 on at least 3 of the written essays. However, in addition, you need an overall AVERAGE score from all your essays, the MBE, and the MPT of 75 or higher to pass. The MBE is weighted as 1/3, and the essays are weighted 2/3. The scores are combined to determine if an overall passing total scaled score of 75 was achieved."
"The scaled score to pass the MBE is approximately 143 on MBE (multistate bar exam), in combination 75 average on written. The raw score is correct questions correct on MBE, out of 200 questions. However, to achieve a scaled score, the bar examiners compare your raw score with others taking the exam. Accordingly, a scaled score will differ each time, but roughly, on the MBE you want to get raw score of 126-128 (depending on performance of the group). Written portion 2/3, MBE 1/3. However, keep in mind that the MBE is 1/3 of your total Bar Exam score, so you don’t have to get scaled 143 on MBE if you do well on the essays."
"Note that on the MBE, a 143 [raw] is 75%. That might help you better understand the overall score required"
Not sure if any of this helpful or stuff you already knew.
I was talking to someone who bought that bar essay thing for CA and he was saying essays received scores in the 50s or 60s even though they missed the point of the question and talked about an entirely different area of the law.