SilverE2 wrote:Add me to the abandoning the long outlines camp. I just learned a subject without looking at the long outline first, and I did as well as I've been doing on the practice problems (a little bit better, in fact). I'll go back to the outlines if my scores start sinking.
Yeah, for me, I had a very comprehensive class on Torts in 1L, and I pretty much knew every single concept covered by the lectures. The longer outline was entirely unnecessary for my Torts base of knowledge. I think I learned maybe five random help facts from the long outline when I looked up something I was unsure of.
But for Constitutional Law, it was absolutely necessary for me to use the long outline. I knew next to nothing about Separation of Powers and First Amendment Law, and some of my memory of 14th Amendment stuff was actually the opposite of reality. Having the detailed explanations helped.
For Evidence, I hardly even plan on reading anything, or even paying attention to the lectures. For Criminal Law, I'll watch the lectures but I doubt I'll need to rely on the long outline almost at all, save for some more advanced notions, like Inchoate Offenses. For Contracts and Real Property, I'll need to read the long outlines cover to cover.
Use the materials to your own personal advantages. Strengths and weaknesses from law school classes are actually having a much bigger effect on my memory for bar subjects than I ever expected.