MBE July 16' reaction Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:21 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Lots of mortgage, civil and criminal pro, evidence.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
(Not a Comcast user)ucc2207 wrote: Really I can't remember a time where I thought a service was so inferior to what was promised.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:56 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Don't think it's weird at all. There's comfort waking up in the morning and saying you did all you could and it was out of your control. The consensus always was Barbri gives you too much work. Barbri over preps you.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:I couldn't find some of the relevant MEE answers even while actively looking for them. It's a weird comfort to be like "there was zero chance I was ever going to be able that that's the relevant law."ucc2207 wrote:Honestly, just blown away by how off target Barbri was about pretty much every part about this exam except the MPT. They could not have done a worse job emphasizing what's important and what's not. Civ Pro- they were completely off. Con Law- good thing we did so much first amendment right? Evidence- MBE was Harder. Contracts- i'm unsure about. Torts- thought was fair. Crim- Barbri needs to reevaluate this subject completely.
But they won't change, they'll keep producing a subpar product and billing firms and people who don't know any better. Aren't they planning on using these same materials for the February 2017 test?
Really I can't remember a time where I thought a service was so inferior to what was promised. I mean they make law school look like the bargain of a life time.
Sorry for the venting, hope everyone got through it okay and did well! Want nothing more than the people who put the time in to get a passing score.
There was never an argument that Barbri could possibly not cover what was on the exam. No one can say you were foolish or lazy for relying on Barbri. You did all you could and did what you were supposed to do and that should be comforting.
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 4:31 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
HOLY CRAP those seemed hard. My afternoon session was ok but the morning session was BRUTAL!!!! What the hell? I thought the essays were relatively easy... no hidden issues or crazy topics but man I am blown away with how hard the MBE was.
Last edited by blaze1306 on Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- anacharsis
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:29 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
ucc2207 wrote:Honestly, just blown away by how off target Barbri was about pretty much every part about this exam except the MPT. They could not have done a worse job emphasizing what's important and what's not. Civ Pro- they were completely off. Con Law- good thing we did so much first amendment right? Evidence- MBE was Harder. Contracts- i'm unsure about. Torts- thought was fair. Crim- Barbri needs to reevaluate this subject completely.
But they won't change, they'll keep producing a subpar product and billing firms and people who don't know any better. Aren't they planning on using these same materials for the February 2017 test?
Really I can't remember a time where I thought a service was so inferior to what was promised. I mean they make law school look like the bargain of a life time.
Sorry for the venting, hope everyone got through it okay and did well! Want nothing more than the people who put the time in to get a passing score.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MCFC
- Posts: 9695
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Honestly our reactions are probably pretty typical. The weird questions are always going to stand out. We're fine.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
I thought the same, and so did many others I spoke to. Just take some comfort in knowing that most of us took Barbri (about 70% according to Barbri's numbers), and the exam is curved. Either way, hoping for the best because that's about all we can do until November. Cheers.ucc2207 wrote:Honestly, just blown away by how off target Barbri was about pretty much every part about this exam except the MPT. They could not have done a worse job emphasizing what's important and what's not. Civ Pro- they were completely off. Con Law- good thing we did so much first amendment right? Evidence- MBE was Harder. Contracts- i'm unsure about. Torts- thought was fair. Crim- Barbri needs to reevaluate this subject completely.
But they won't change, they'll keep producing a subpar product and billing firms and people who don't know any better. Aren't they planning on using these same materials for the February 2017 test?
Really I can't remember a time where I thought a service was so inferior to what was promised. I mean they make law school look like the bargain of a life time.
Sorry for the venting, hope everyone got through it okay and did well! Want nothing more than the people who put the time in to get a passing score.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 7:25 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Evidence, Torts, K, and Crim were mostly similar to Barbri, imo.
Handful of off-the-wall con law and real property questions.
Agree that civ pro was way different.
Handful of off-the-wall con law and real property questions.
Agree that civ pro was way different.
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
I think it might have some effect on equatinf but the fact that 70% took barbri is will not have a substantial effect. they are equating the scores and we're competing against everyone who ever took the exam.Obama2016 wrote:I thought the same, and so did many others I spoke to. Just take some comfort in knowing that most of us took Barbri (about 70% according to Barbri's numbers), and the exam is curved. Either way, hoping for the best because that's about all we can do until November. Cheers.ucc2207 wrote:Honestly, just blown away by how off target Barbri was about pretty much every part about this exam except the MPT. They could not have done a worse job emphasizing what's important and what's not. Civ Pro- they were completely off. Con Law- good thing we did so much first amendment right? Evidence- MBE was Harder. Contracts- i'm unsure about. Torts- thought was fair. Crim- Barbri needs to reevaluate this subject completely.
But they won't change, they'll keep producing a subpar product and billing firms and people who don't know any better. Aren't they planning on using these same materials for the February 2017 test?
Really I can't remember a time where I thought a service was so inferior to what was promised. I mean they make law school look like the bargain of a life time.
Sorry for the venting, hope everyone got through it okay and did well! Want nothing more than the people who put the time in to get a passing score.
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction

Last edited by mvp99 on Sat Jul 30, 2016 6:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:43 am
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Thank fucking godgeneraltoast wrote:Anyone else get a SHIT TON of "d" answers in one of their collums? Plz.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:36 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
i also had a lot of b's. d's and b's were coming up everywhere for me...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Maybe I'm in the minority with this, but I thought the morning was harder across the board and that the afternoon was more of a split. It has many easier questions, but way more super difficult "WTF" questions.
-
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Very yes. I ended up getting a bunch of c's toward the end of the last column. Talking about the afternoon, that is.mavshoosiers wrote:i also had a lot of b's. d's and b's were coming up everywhere for me...
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 9:46 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Are the 10 experimental questions included in one's score calculation? For example, if you get them right, do you get the points?
- LionelHutzJD
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
I honestly do not remember if I had a string of any one letter. Not so many As I think though.
I also really liked the sneaky removal question.
I also really liked the sneaky removal question.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:56 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
I thought the same, and so did many others I spoke to. Just take some comfort in knowing that most of us took Barbri (about 70% according to Barbri's numbers), and the exam is curved. Either way, hoping for the best because that's about all we can do until November. Cheers.[/quote]
I think it might have some effect but the fact that 70% took barbri is will not have a substantial effect. they are equating the scores and we're competing against everyone who ever took the exam.[/quote]
This is the issue. This isn't like your 1L contracts exam where no one spotted an issue, and it just had no impact. From my understanding, and correct me if I'm wrong, this isn't a true curve. It's somewhat curved, but they are comparing us to past examinees. This is why the pass rate drops. if it was a true curve wouldn't the pass rate stay fairly constant?
I know some people are saying everyone always feels like this after the bar but idk. I mean on that last mixed set for barbri i scored well over 90%; and pretty much was guessing between two options on the majority of the questions today. Moreover, there was almost 0 overlap from that final mixed set and the questions we saw today. And this is just the MBE part.
What about the MEE section? I feel terrible for the guy running efficient bar prep because he was riding a wave of support, and I could have done a better job picking the topics out of a hat. He obviously only had every incentive to have a correct prediction, and no one could have predicted not only the topics on the MEE but also the obscure and unsettled areas of the law that were tested.
I really feel like this UBE was a unicorn of an exam and really has shaken things up. Does anyone else agree? I may be overblowing it, but I'm not sure that I am.
I think it might have some effect but the fact that 70% took barbri is will not have a substantial effect. they are equating the scores and we're competing against everyone who ever took the exam.[/quote]
This is the issue. This isn't like your 1L contracts exam where no one spotted an issue, and it just had no impact. From my understanding, and correct me if I'm wrong, this isn't a true curve. It's somewhat curved, but they are comparing us to past examinees. This is why the pass rate drops. if it was a true curve wouldn't the pass rate stay fairly constant?
I know some people are saying everyone always feels like this after the bar but idk. I mean on that last mixed set for barbri i scored well over 90%; and pretty much was guessing between two options on the majority of the questions today. Moreover, there was almost 0 overlap from that final mixed set and the questions we saw today. And this is just the MBE part.
What about the MEE section? I feel terrible for the guy running efficient bar prep because he was riding a wave of support, and I could have done a better job picking the topics out of a hat. He obviously only had every incentive to have a correct prediction, and no one could have predicted not only the topics on the MEE but also the obscure and unsettled areas of the law that were tested.
I really feel like this UBE was a unicorn of an exam and really has shaken things up. Does anyone else agree? I may be overblowing it, but I'm not sure that I am.
-
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Sneaky? It seemed pretty straightforward unless I overlooked something?LionelHutzJD wrote:I honestly do not remember if I had a string of any one letter. Not so many As I think though.
I also really liked the sneaky removal question.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:56 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Exact same as you, chickened out and changed one of my D's last minute- i know i changed it to the wrong answer in hindsight but time was called. Barbri just never had more than three of the same letters in a row, and usually if you had three in a row- one was wrong with barbri.whitecollar23 wrote:Very yes. I ended up getting a bunch of c's toward the end of the last column. Talking about the afternoon, that is.mavshoosiers wrote:i also had a lot of b's. d's and b's were coming up everywhere for me...
-
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Sneaky as in Plaintiff was trying to removewhitecollar23 wrote:Sneaky? It seemed pretty straightforward unless I overlooked something?LionelHutzJD wrote:I honestly do not remember if I had a string of any one letter. Not so many As I think though.
I also really liked the sneaky removal question.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LionelHutzJD
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Yessirarklaw13 wrote:Sneaky as in Plaintiff was trying to removewhitecollar23 wrote:Sneaky? It seemed pretty straightforward unless I overlooked something?LionelHutzJD wrote:I honestly do not remember if I had a string of any one letter. Not so many As I think though.
I also really liked the sneaky removal question.
-
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
Did that change the reason for why it wasn't allowed?arklaw13 wrote:Sneaky as in Plaintiff was trying to removewhitecollar23 wrote:Sneaky? It seemed pretty straightforward unless I overlooked something?LionelHutzJD wrote:I honestly do not remember if I had a string of any one letter. Not so many As I think though.
I also really liked the sneaky removal question.
Mods: Is this abstract enough?
- FeraFera
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:04 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
They are. Post mbe responses are on repeat exam after exam. Right down to the why did you do this to us barbri complaints.MCFC wrote:Honestly our reactions are probably pretty typical. The weird questions are always going to stand out. We're fine.
-
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm
Re: MBE July 16' reaction
LOL @ how deceivingly easy OPE-4 is compared to the actual MBE questions.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login