Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:41 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Thought the Torts distinction video for NY was not great. Was a bit confused as he was working through it. Seems like some of the MBE rules that the other dude listed in that fill in the blank outline weren't entirely on point either.
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Did you follow along with the New York Subjects book? He followed it pretty closely.orangecup wrote:Thought the Torts distinction video for NY was not great. Was a bit confused as he was working through it. Seems like some of the MBE rules that the other dude listed in that fill in the blank outline weren't entirely on point either.
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:41 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
I did about halfway through. Still thought it wasn't presented very well though (both the book itself, and the video)Jason Taverner wrote:Did you follow along with the New York Subjects book? He followed it pretty closely.orangecup wrote:Thought the Torts distinction video for NY was not great. Was a bit confused as he was working through it. Seems like some of the MBE rules that the other dude listed in that fill in the blank outline weren't entirely on point either.
For instance, will we need to know all the other distinctions listed in that book? Or are the ones he outlined sufficient?
Also, does the fact that NY abolishes invitee/licensee/trespasser distinction mean that mean that we use the reasonably prudent person standard for everything under Point 6 on the fill in the blank outline (Land Possessor Liability)? Or do we still apply MBE rules for things like Plaintiffs not on the land?
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
I'd say it's like everything else—it's impossible to know everything, so you try to learn the important/easy things and see him many of the others you pick up.orangecup wrote:I did about halfway through. Still thought it wasn't presented very well though (both the book itself, and the video)Jason Taverner wrote:Did you follow along with the New York Subjects book? He followed it pretty closely.orangecup wrote:Thought the Torts distinction video for NY was not great. Was a bit confused as he was working through it. Seems like some of the MBE rules that the other dude listed in that fill in the blank outline weren't entirely on point either.
For instance, will we need to know all the other distinctions listed in that book? Or are the ones he outlined sufficient?
Also, does the fact that NY abolishes invitee/licensee/trespasser distinction mean that mean that we use the reasonably prudent person standard for everything under Point 6 on the fill in the blank outline (Land Possessor Liability)? Or do we still apply MBE rules for things like Plaintiffs not on the land?
Re: invitee/licensee/trespasser thing, I'm not sure what you're talking about, but you're not going to apply the MBE rule over the NY rule for the NY sections, unless you don't know the NY rule. It's not the reasonably prudent person standard it's the "reasonable under the circumstances" standard. He made that pretty clear/that seems like one of the few things that you'd want to try to commit to memory from this section, yeah?
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:41 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Woops, my bad. That's what I meant, was just going off my imperfect memory (it takes me forever to commit this stuff to memory).Jason Taverner wrote: I'd say it's like everything else—it's impossible to know everything, so you try to learn the important/easy things and see him many of the others you pick up.
Re: invitee/licensee/trespasser thing, I'm not sure what you're talking about, but you're not going to apply the MBE rule over the NY rule for the NY sections, unless you don't know the NY rule. It's not the reasonably prudent person standard it's the "reasonable under the circumstances" standard. He made that pretty clear/that seems like one of the few things that you'd want to try to commit to memory from this section, yeah?
The fill in the blank outline had several sections:
Land possessor liability
- Plaintiffs on the Land
- Plaintiffs not on the land
- Landlord and Tenants
I know that the NY rule obviously applies for plaintiffs on the land. But what about plaintiffs not on the land? The MBE rule is that for artificial conditions on the land, D has a reasonable duty of care (and for natural conditions, no duty unless a tree in an urban area). Does NY follow this as well? Or does the reasonable under the circumstances rule prevail?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bowser
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:54 am
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Why does Kaplan have so many MBE questions with subject matter completely left out of the Outline/videos? Out of 10 practice questions it seems like 2-4 test material you never even know about until you read the answer key. I don't understand how making you struggle with a question they haven't even prepped you for is helpful.
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:35 am
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Agreed. I've decided to skip doing QBank questions until I've watched all the videos for that subject.bowser wrote:Why does Kaplan have so many MBE questions with subject matter completely left out of the Outline/videos? Out of 10 practice questions it seems like 2-4 test material you never even know about until you read the answer key. I don't understand how making you struggle with a question they haven't even prepped you for is helpful.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:52 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
How are people scoring on these MBE questions? I'm scoring in the 65 - 75% area. Are these decent percentages at this point?
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Nah, you really wanna be in the 95% - 100% at this point.westphillybandr wrote:How are people scoring on these MBE questions? I'm scoring in the 65 - 75% area. Are these decent percentages at this point?
For real though, 65% is the goal they say you should be able to pass the MBE with.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:52 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Really? I didn't realize the standards were so low. I haven't put much studying in. Am I missing something?LAW813FL wrote:Nah, you really wanna be in the 95% - 100% at this point.westphillybandr wrote:How are people scoring on these MBE questions? I'm scoring in the 65 - 75% area. Are these decent percentages at this point?
For real though, 65% is the goal they say you should be able to pass the MBE with.
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
It's not that low when you think about it. you need a 136 scaled to pass. 65% of the questions right on the bar exam would be 130 correct answers for your raw score. After scaling, that would be around 140-145. Of course, going above and beyond that is good in case you mess up on Florida.westphillybandr wrote:Really? I didn't realize the standards were so low. I haven't put much studying in. Am I missing something?LAW813FL wrote:Nah, you really wanna be in the 95% - 100% at this point.westphillybandr wrote:How are people scoring on these MBE questions? I'm scoring in the 65 - 75% area. Are these decent percentages at this point?
For real though, 65% is the goal they say you should be able to pass the MBE with.
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Anybody else get a handful of non-negligence, or whatever subject, questions in a quiz when you select only negligence, or whatever subject you select? I just tried to do a negligence-only quiz and there were a couple questions about easements and vicarious liability and a couple of other things not mentioned in the lecture.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:39 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Joining the thread to agree with this and complain about the generally shitty quality of the QBank questions. I feel like they choose the most random topics to hone in on and they don't track the MBE content/form that closely. I'm pretty close to giving up on the QBank and doing the MBE book only.LAW813FL wrote:Anybody else get a handful of non-negligence, or whatever subject, questions in a quiz when you select only negligence, or whatever subject you select? I just tried to do a negligence-only quiz and there were a couple questions about easements and vicarious liability and a couple of other things not mentioned in the lecture.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Is there a difference between the Qbank and MBE book questions? I always just assumed they were the same content.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:39 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
I could be wrong, but I thought the mbe practice q book is actual, previous mbe questions and the qbank is Kaplan created questions.
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:27 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
.
Last edited by underthirty on Fri Jun 19, 2015 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 1:54 am
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
My review course started off with Property, now Con Law and next is Civ Pro. Are the courses specifically tailored for each user?
Also, anyone here doing the CA Bar? How is Kaplan working out so far?
Also, anyone here doing the CA Bar? How is Kaplan working out so far?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:40 am
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
I think the order is state-specific. I'm doing CA and I have the same order. It's going okay so far, I don't have a strong opinion on it yet.
- robinhoodOO
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Yup, taking the CA version and we're all on the same 'schedule.'spek wrote:I think the order is state-specific. I'm doing CA and I have the same order. It's going okay so far, I don't have a strong opinion on it yet.
Complaints:
1) Personally, I've found some annoying grammatical and spelling issues with some of the QBank MBE's. One just from the other day really stood out leaving out the word "install" between state and state-of-the-art. Uff da.
2) Also on complaints about QBank, I've noticed some of the Q's testing weird little exceptions that were not in the outlines or lectures. This seems to jive with someone's earlier complaint, and it's very annoying.
3) I'm not a fan of filling in bar notes. Hate the format and it seems like a waste of time. I've already completely reverted the first two subjects into personal outlines and completely disregarded the Bar Notes. More condensed, better formatted, etc. Honestly, that's probably what we should be doing anyway, so this isn't that big of a deal.
4) Only minor annoyances, but overall it's 'satisfactory.' Probably also fair to say it meets the minimum competency for Bar Review...

-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:15 am
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
So then does anyone know why there is a qbank and an mbe practice hardcopy book? And why they split the assignments up through them?underthirty wrote:Nope. All questions are created by Kaplan.fishy wrote:I could be wrong, but I thought the mbe practice q book is actual, previous mbe questions and the qbank is Kaplan created questions.
- SiRR
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:38 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
I believe the justification is to prepare for test day by practicing with paper/pencil. I find that rationale somewhat suspect. I mean, at this point, if you haven't figured out how to properly bubble a scantron...gabewatch wrote:So then does anyone know why there is a qbank and an mbe practice hardcopy book? And why they split the assignments up through them?underthirty wrote:Nope. All questions are created by Kaplan.fishy wrote:I could be wrong, but I thought the mbe practice q book is actual, previous mbe questions and the qbank is Kaplan created questions.
I would much rather have all the questions available on QBank - though I suppose it's helpful if you're somewhere without internet?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- robinhoodOO
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Maybe I'm weird, but I actually prefer the hardcopy. I seem to be able to focus better and have one less distraction (the PC).SiRR wrote:I believe the justification is to prepare for test day by practicing with paper/pencil. I find that rationale somewhat suspect. I mean, at this point, if you haven't figured out how to properly bubble a scantron...gabewatch wrote:So then does anyone know why there is a qbank and an mbe practice hardcopy book? And why they split the assignments up through them?underthirty wrote:Nope. All questions are created by Kaplan.fishy wrote:I could be wrong, but I thought the mbe practice q book is actual, previous mbe questions and the qbank is Kaplan created questions.
I would much rather have all the questions available on QBank - though I suppose it's helpful if you're somewhere without internet?
With that said, I'd chime in that the quality of questions between the two does seem to be slightly different. I'm grading higher on the book MBE's, but this could just be because it's easier for me to focus.
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
I agree that it is easier to focus on the hardcopy questions. I do think they are the same types of questions, even though the QBank questions seem to be short novels sometimes. I guess it bodes well for the actual MBE that we focus better on the hardcopy tho, we won't be straining our eyes looking at computer screens all day.robinhoodOO wrote:Maybe I'm weird, but I actually prefer the hardcopy. I seem to be able to focus better and have one less distraction (the PC).SiRR wrote:I believe the justification is to prepare for test day by practicing with paper/pencil. I find that rationale somewhat suspect. I mean, at this point, if you haven't figured out how to properly bubble a scantron...gabewatch wrote:So then does anyone know why there is a qbank and an mbe practice hardcopy book? And why they split the assignments up through them?underthirty wrote:Nope. All questions are created by Kaplan.fishy wrote:I could be wrong, but I thought the mbe practice q book is actual, previous mbe questions and the qbank is Kaplan created questions.
I would much rather have all the questions available on QBank - though I suppose it's helpful if you're somewhere without internet?
With that said, I'd chime in that the quality of questions between the two does seem to be slightly different. I'm grading higher on the book MBE's, but this could just be because it's easier for me to focus.
- robinhoodOO
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
Exactly--haha. Are you taking the FL bar then?LAW813FL wrote:I agree that it is easier to focus on the hardcopy questions. I do think they are the same types of questions, even though the QBank questions seem to be short novels sometimes. I guess it bodes well for the actual MBE that we focus better on the hardcopy tho, we won't be straining our eyes looking at computer screens all day.robinhoodOO wrote:Maybe I'm weird, but I actually prefer the hardcopy. I seem to be able to focus better and have one less distraction (the PC).SiRR wrote:I believe the justification is to prepare for test day by practicing with paper/pencil. I find that rationale somewhat suspect. I mean, at this point, if you haven't figured out how to properly bubble a scantron...gabewatch wrote:So then does anyone know why there is a qbank and an mbe practice hardcopy book? And why they split the assignments up through them?underthirty wrote:Nope. All questions are created by Kaplan.fishy wrote:I could be wrong, but I thought the mbe practice q book is actual, previous mbe questions and the qbank is Kaplan created questions.
I would much rather have all the questions available on QBank - though I suppose it's helpful if you're somewhere without internet?
With that said, I'd chime in that the quality of questions between the two does seem to be slightly different. I'm grading higher on the book MBE's, but this could just be because it's easier for me to focus.
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:07 pm
Re: Kaplan Bar Review Hangout - July 2015 Exam
The MBE book came in handy this morning when Kaplan wouldn't let me into the course........ 

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login