Catleesi wrote:Here it's nothing but top hats and monocles and the haughtiest humble bragging I've ever heard.

Catleesi wrote:Here it's nothing but top hats and monocles and the haughtiest humble bragging I've ever heard.
My "My Outline" is blank. I know that feel, bro.dsclaw wrote:Where are these charts and handouts people are speaking of my review lectures do not seem to have any of the sort. I feel cheated
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
The charts and whatnot are for the lecture handout associated with the MBE Workshop II, which I personally don't have on my schedule until Friday. They aren't for the MBE review that we have scheduled today/tomorrow.dsclaw wrote:Where are these charts and handouts people are speaking of my review lectures do not seem to have any of the sort. I feel cheated
I don't specify the nature of the recording statute because I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter.While a subsequent grantee must have paid value in order to be protected by a recording statute, an earlier grantee who properly records is protected against any subsequent grantee (whether purchaser or donee). In example form:
-- At Time1, O gives Blackacre as gift to Donee, who properly records. At Time2, O sells Blackacre to Purchaser for value. Regardless of whether Purchaser records, Donee will prevail over Purchaser because Donee recorded.
-- At Time1, O sells Blackacre for value to Purchaser, who does not record. At Time2, O gives Blackacre as gift to Donee, who then records. Purchaser wins, despite the fact that he didn't record and Donee did, because Donee, not having given value, isn’t protected by the recording statute, and therefore “first in time, first in right” governs.
+1Catleesi wrote:http://img.pandawhale.com/46691-cat-dea ... f-IjeF.gif
But seriously, all I'm saying is nobody here is more likely to pass the bar in their state because they've made other people on the forum feel bad about their chances. Let's just leave the scores on the MyProgress page and focus on frustrations with the course, discussions of strategy, question analysis and general support.
Agreed, which is why I'm here...Bedsole wrote:Yeah, I like to have those kind of people too, but at the same time there are things they don't always understand about why you're stressed that are legitimate. For example, talking to my family and they ask "How much of the course have you finished?" I answer "about 65%." They get this look on their faces like I have spent the whole summer playing video games or something. From time to time I need to commiserate with someone who understands what a grind this process is.
To really understand the recording statute all you really have to understand is its purpose. The purpose for recording statute is to protect your interest against subsequent interests of the same property. For a subsequent interest to have a better interest is must usually be a Bona fide purchaser ( good faith + value + without notice (unless its purely race)). A person who inherits land can still have a greater interest then another individual if that individual inherits without notice (in a notice jurisdiction) or records first (in a race jurisdiction). So if A deeded land over to B and B does not record, does not stay in the house, etc. A then leaves the same land to C in a will, C could potentially have a greater claim to the land.GertrudePerkins wrote:Hey gang, I got tricked by Question 87 on the Simulated MBE. I'm pretty sure I understand it now, but I made myself write my own mini-explanation with examples to help me clarify the relevant distinction. I'm posting it here so that either (1) someone can correct me if I've got it wrong, or (2) it can possibly be helpful to others if I've got it right:I don't specify the nature of the recording statute because I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter.While a subsequent grantee must have paid value in order to be protected by a recording statute, an earlier grantee who properly records is protected against any subsequent grantee (whether purchaser or donee). In example form:
-- At Time1, O gives Blackacre as gift to Donee, who properly records. At Time2, O sells Blackacre to Purchaser for value. Regardless of whether Purchaser records, Donee will prevail over Purchaser because Donee recorded.
-- At Time1, O sells Blackacre for value to Purchaser, who does not record. At Time2, O gives Blackacre as gift to Donee, who then records. Purchaser wins, despite the fact that he didn't record and Donee did, because Donee, not having given value, isn’t protected by the recording statute, and therefore “first in time, first in right” governs.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
If average is a 145-146, I highly doubt that 70% equates to average...Desert Fox wrote:Chillax guys. 70% is probably a 145 on the MBE.
Also: average on the MBE is about 145-146. So if you are average, you are doing great.
Agreed. It took me my whole first semester and one set of grades to convince my family that "Stop worrying-- you're gonna get As like you always have" was unhelpful and untrue.Agoraphobia wrote:Agreed, which is why I'm here...Bedsole wrote:Yeah, I like to have those kind of people too, but at the same time there are things they don't always understand about why you're stressed that are legitimate. For example, talking to my family and they ask "How much of the course have you finished?" I answer "about 65%." They get this look on their faces like I have spent the whole summer playing video games or something. From time to time I need to commiserate with someone who understands what a grind this process is.
I'm talking about Scaled on the real thing. Average is 145-146. Which really only requires about 70% on the REAL thing, not on themis Qs which may be harder.dsclaw wrote:If average is a 145-146, I highly doubt that 70% equates to average...Desert Fox wrote:Chillax guys. 70% is probably a 145 on the MBE.
Also: average on the MBE is about 145-146. So if you are average, you are doing great.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
70% means you got 140 questions right out of 200. I would imagine that would get you a much higher scaled score than 145.Desert Fox wrote:I'm talking about Scaled on the real thing. Average is 145-146. Which really only requires about 70% on the REAL thing, not on themis Qs which may be harder.dsclaw wrote:If average is a 145-146, I highly doubt that 70% equates to average...Desert Fox wrote:Chillax guys. 70% is probably a 145 on the MBE.
Also: average on the MBE is about 145-146. So if you are average, you are doing great.
According to Seperac.com a 130 raw score in NY was anywhere between a scaled score of 138-141 on the past three mbes and a 135 was a 142.4 - 147.5, a 140 was 146 -151thebull wrote:70% means you got 140 questions right out of 200. I would imagine that would get you a much higher scaled score than 145.Desert Fox wrote:I'm talking about Scaled on the real thing. Average is 145-146. Which really only requires about 70% on the REAL thing, not on themis Qs which may be harder.dsclaw wrote:If average is a 145-146, I highly doubt that 70% equates to average...Desert Fox wrote:Chillax guys. 70% is probably a 145 on the MBE.
Also: average on the MBE is about 145-146. So if you are average, you are doing great.
Thanks for sharing this. That whole "recording statutes are not intended to protect donees" thing ALWAYS gets me. Your explanation makes sense.GertrudePerkins wrote:Hey gang, I got tricked by Question 87 on the Simulated MBE. I'm pretty sure I understand it now, but I made myself write my own mini-explanation with examples to help me clarify the relevant distinction. I'm posting it here so that either (1) someone can correct me if I've got it wrong, or (2) it can possibly be helpful to others if I've got it right:I don't specify the nature of the recording statute because I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter.While a subsequent grantee must have paid value in order to be protected by a recording statute, an earlier grantee who properly records is protected against any subsequent grantee (whether purchaser or donee). In example form:
-- At Time1, O gives Blackacre as gift to Donee, who properly records. At Time2, O sells Blackacre to Purchaser for value. Regardless of whether Purchaser records, Donee will prevail over Purchaser because Donee recorded.
-- At Time1, O sells Blackacre for value to Purchaser, who does not record. At Time2, O gives Blackacre as gift to Donee, who then records. Purchaser wins, despite the fact that he didn't record and Donee did, because Donee, not having given value, isn’t protected by the recording statute, and therefore “first in time, first in right” governs.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Even if it did, "average" puts you at the 50th percentile. If 80% of students pass, you're AHEAD of 30% of passers. That's not necessary.dsclaw wrote:If average is a 145-146, I highly doubt that 70% equates to average...Desert Fox wrote:Chillax guys. 70% is probably a 145 on the MBE.
Also: average on the MBE is about 145-146. So if you are average, you are doing great.
10 questions don't count. You'd get 133 raw at 70%.thebull wrote:70% means you got 140 questions right out of 200. I would imagine that would get you a much higher scaled score than 145.Desert Fox wrote:I'm talking about Scaled on the real thing. Average is 145-146. Which really only requires about 70% on the REAL thing, not on themis Qs which may be harder.dsclaw wrote:If average is a 145-146, I highly doubt that 70% equates to average...Desert Fox wrote:Chillax guys. 70% is probably a 145 on the MBE.
Also: average on the MBE is about 145-146. So if you are average, you are doing great.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login