July 2015 California Bar Exam Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:49 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
I forgot the rules for ouster lol =/robinhoodOO wrote:But, co-tenant can't adversely possess another co-tenant's interest. Gotta oust his assUnderoath wrote:that's exactly why I did APBuenAbogado wrote:If no adverse possession issue, how did you utilize the fact where L did not know that P took possession of the land?
- publicservant101
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:58 am
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
That said, I forgot all about dr once I got him out on --.Way to f up my later analysis if dr was supposed to be part of it!
Last edited by publicservant101 on Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:49 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
just laughed out loudsoj wrote:y'all did fine, watch some netflix and go to bed. stop thinking about today's essays. we all missed some issues
- robinhoodOO
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Not so sure, but whateverBrokenMouse wrote:The damn DO and P were on the same side of the column and the evil corp was from elsewhere.brotherdarkness wrote:Srsly? Lol what the fuck was I reading today, because it clearly wasn't the facts.robinhoodOO wrote:Nah, P didpublicservant101 wrote:The doctor didn't move... I don't think?

Last edited by robinhoodOO on Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 7:05 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
I was wondering if DO actually moved but I could recall. What I know is that P didn't move, because he just was in the place treatment, he didn't intent to make the new state his home.
- BuenAbogado
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 3:43 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Did (c) of the PT require a lot of analysis or did it get dismissed because it wasn't stated in original complaint and there was no excuse?
I put a lot of analysis in there including experts and some other stuff. Hopefully that shouldn't have been part of a.
B was short though because he said "yes" and didn't have a good explanation per the last case.
What do you guys think?
I put a lot of analysis in there including experts and some other stuff. Hopefully that shouldn't have been part of a.
B was short though because he said "yes" and didn't have a good explanation per the last case.
What do you guys think?
- brotherdarkness
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Lol. Apparently both P and Dr moved. I didn't notice either of those facts, and did not discuss changing residency at all. Apparently my super solid essay is now a total boondoggle. Dang.robinhoodOO wrote:I just text my buddy to make sure I wasn't losing my mind: P moved.BrokenMouse wrote:The damn DO and P were on the same side of the column and the evil corp was from elsewhere.brotherdarkness wrote:Srsly? Lol what the fuck was I reading today, because it clearly wasn't the facts.robinhoodOO wrote:Nah, P didpublicservant101 wrote:The doctor didn't move... I don't think?
- BuenAbogado
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 3:43 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
He moved, but his move required a pennoyer v neff domicile analysis.robinhoodOO wrote:I just text my buddy to make sure I wasn't losing my mind: P moved.BrokenMouse wrote:The damn DO and P were on the same side of the column and the evil corp was from elsewhere.brotherdarkness wrote:Srsly? Lol what the fuck was I reading today, because it clearly wasn't the facts.robinhoodOO wrote:Nah, P didpublicservant101 wrote:The doctor didn't move... I don't think?
- smokeylarue
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...
- robinhoodOO
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
I did too and BSed it :/Underoath wrote:I forgot the rules for ouster lol =/robinhoodOO wrote:But, co-tenant can't adversely possess another co-tenant's interest. Gotta oust his assUnderoath wrote:that's exactly why I did APBuenAbogado wrote:If no adverse possession issue, how did you utilize the fact where L did not know that P took possession of the land?
- robinhoodOO
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Agree to disagree heresmokeylarue wrote:Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...

Last edited by robinhoodOO on Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
.
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:42 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Perhaps I'm missing something.. But how would P moving affect the analysis of Question 1 anyways? Unless we're only talking question 3..
Either way, it's all over now anyways.
Either way, it's all over now anyways.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 7:05 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
It said with intent to remain to receive treatment.robinhoodOO wrote:It literally said w/intent to remainsmokeylarue wrote:Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
.
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
It said he intended to remain there "indefinitely"Zaizei wrote:It said with intent to remain to receive treatment.robinhoodOO wrote:It literally said w/intent to remainsmokeylarue wrote:Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...
Also it doesn't matter because it didn't affect the analysis either way and either conclusion was reasonable.
And the doctor didn't move.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 5:06 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
People freaking out too much. Other people posting things they saw that you didn't see, but you may have issues that they didn't see. Further if your analysis was bad it doesn't matter if you spotted every single issue.
I've read essays that have received 70-80s and they miss a bunch of issues. You have one hour to write each question. The thing is somewhat subjective.
I've read essays that have received 70-80s and they miss a bunch of issues. You have one hour to write each question. The thing is somewhat subjective.
Last edited by atticus89 on Wed Jul 29, 2015 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- publicservant101
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:58 am
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
I also kept wanting to bring in compulsory joinder somehow... But couldn't make it fit. But it kept coming to mind. Anyone mention it?
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- robinhoodOO
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Both. I pulled a Fromm and highlighted, circled, and underlined this shit when outlining hahaZaizei wrote: It said with intent to remain to receive treatment.
Last edited by robinhoodOO on Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 5:06 pm
Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
I've read 65s (and higher) that were written poorly but had most of the issues. I've also read 65s and higher that missed several issues but were written really well with great analysis for the issues they had.
There are multiple paths to a 65. The conclusion matters less than your reasoning and path to get there.
There are multiple paths to a 65. The conclusion matters less than your reasoning and path to get there.
Last edited by atticus89 on Wed Jul 29, 2015 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login