Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
Law-So-Hard

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:00 pm
Post
by Law-So-Hard » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:56 pm
TitoSantana wrote:I'M TELLING YOU PEOPLE, 2ND AMENDMENT QUESTION THIS THURSDAY AND THE FACTS ARE GOING TO INCLUDE A MEXICAN WITH A LIMP, A HOMELESS GUY FROM MISSISSIPPI WITH ONE TOOTH AND A DONKEY. THE QUESTION MAY BE A CROSSOVER WITH MARITIME LAW. GET ON IT!
Thanks, Tito

-
jarofsoup

- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:41 am
Post
by jarofsoup » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:59 pm
lmr wrote:pkt63 wrote:chicoalto0649 wrote:For the hearsay statements did any one else get
1st: admit first statement (not offered to prove truth of the matter asserted)
2nd: exclude second statement (not a party opponent statement because absence of special relation
3rd: admit maintenance report (business record)
Wait why admit the first but not the second when they were both EEs of ABC?
As for the maintenance report, I can't remember what I put now about the inner hearsay. I think I said it might qualify as a contemporaneous statement IF custodian testified that the reports are written near the time of the events they report on. But that whole thing seems ridic to me now, and I'm super confused.
Yeah vicarious admission-he was employed, made statement within scope of employment, etc. I thought that was clearer than the first statement considering other guy was a mechanic and 2nd man was a supervisor of the company.
Then there was the competency of W.
-
lmr

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:22 am
Post
by lmr » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:02 am
jarofsoup wrote:lmr wrote:pkt63 wrote:chicoalto0649 wrote:For the hearsay statements did any one else get
1st: admit first statement (not offered to prove truth of the matter asserted)
2nd: exclude second statement (not a party opponent statement because absence of special relation
3rd: admit maintenance report (business record)
Wait why admit the first but not the second when they were both EEs of ABC?
As for the maintenance report, I can't remember what I put now about the inner hearsay. I think I said it might qualify as a contemporaneous statement IF custodian testified that the reports are written near the time of the events they report on. But that whole thing seems ridic to me now, and I'm super confused.
Yeah vicarious admission-he was employed, made statement within scope of employment, etc. I thought that was clearer than the first statement considering other guy was a mechanic and 2nd man was a supervisor of the company.
Then there was the competency of W.
I always write W competency w a testimonial question but was there an issue you found w competency or did you just discuss the elements and conclude he was competent?
-
fish52

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:08 pm
Post
by fish52 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:05 am
So how bad can you mess up and still pass? Any anecdotal evidence of people screwing up an entire essay or an entire PT and still passing? Give me hope here, guys.
-
usctoucla

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:52 am
Post
by usctoucla » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:06 am
anyone else still having trouble with softest? upload through examsoft failed. then tried to upload on their website and the browser just timed out
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
pkt63

- Posts: 282
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:06 pm
Post
by pkt63 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:09 am
lmr wrote:jarofsoup wrote:
Then there was the competency of W.
I always write W competency w a testimonial question but was there an issue you found w competency or did you just discuss the elements and conclude he was competent?
That's precisely what I did, too.
-
pkt63

- Posts: 282
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:06 pm
Post
by pkt63 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:12 am
What time are we supposed to be there tomorrow morning? I think they said 8:30 and doors open at 8:15 right? (I assume it's the same at all locations, but I'm at Oakland.)
Also, is it just me or is it actually not important to arrive on time at all? I was sitting my ass in my seat far before 8:20 this morning, but I saw SCORES of people arriving after 8:30, including as late as like 8:45! I'm seriously sleeping an extra half hour at least tomorrow morning, and am planning on walking in at like 8:25.
-
lmr

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:22 am
Post
by lmr » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:12 am
usctoucla wrote:anyone else still having trouble with softest? upload through examsoft failed. then tried to upload on their website and the browser just timed out
Keep trying it will work. You aren't the only one
http://abovethelaw.com/2014/07/bar-exam ... life-hard/
-
iLoveFruits&Veggies

- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 12:01 pm
Post
by iLoveFruits&Veggies » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:14 am
Law-So-Hard wrote:darn it I totally forgot to mention it wasn't binding but persuasive that would have really helped my argument :\
does anyone else feel like they could have done a really good job on that PT if they had maybe another hour, or if it was a legit assignment and you had a day or half day to do it? grrr....it sucks feeling like you could have done so much better but couldn't because of the time and fatigue crunch
YES! I really needed more time! One more hour would have made ALL the difference. My PT ends in pure craziness with me typing as fast as I can with tons of spelling errors and makes no sense lol!
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
Law-So-Hard

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:00 pm
Post
by Law-So-Hard » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:19 am
iLoveFruits&Veggies wrote:Law-So-Hard wrote:darn it I totally forgot to mention it wasn't binding but persuasive that would have really helped my argument :\
does anyone else feel like they could have done a really good job on that PT if they had maybe another hour, or if it was a legit assignment and you had a day or half day to do it? grrr....it sucks feeling like you could have done so much better but couldn't because of the time and fatigue crunch
YES! I really needed more time! One more hour would have made ALL the difference. My PT ends in pure craziness with me typing as fast as I can with tons of spelling errors and makes no sense lol!
yikes same I barely erased all my random notes before time was called and my last 2 paragraphs were [bunch of quotes/meager analysis and facts from case 2] + [therefore,....]
-
rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Post
by rpupkin » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:37 am
fish52 wrote:So how bad can you mess up and still pass? Any anecdotal evidence of people screwing up an entire essay or an entire PT and still passing? Give me hope here, guys.
Here's an anecdote: when I took the Cali bar, I had one essay where I did not know the relevant law AT ALL. I just made shit up. And I had two other essays where I missed major issues and/or did not know the relevant rules.
I also was really confused by the the first day's PT. I never really could figure it out. I maybe wrote 1,500 words.
I passed.
Now, I think I did well on the MBE. Also, I think my three good essays were very good. But the point is you can fuck up significant portions of the California bar and still pass. It's really worthwhile to keep a positive attitude.
-
JJDancer

- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:41 pm
Post
by JJDancer » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:41 am
Law-So-Hard wrote:iLoveFruits&Veggies wrote:Law-So-Hard wrote:darn it I totally forgot to mention it wasn't binding but persuasive that would have really helped my argument :\
does anyone else feel like they could have done a really good job on that PT if they had maybe another hour, or if it was a legit assignment and you had a day or half day to do it? grrr....it sucks feeling like you could have done so much better but couldn't because of the time and fatigue crunch
YES! I really needed more time! One more hour would have made ALL the difference. My PT ends in pure craziness with me typing as fast as I can with tons of spelling errors and makes no sense lol!
yikes same I barely erased all my random notes before time was called and my last 2 paragraphs were [bunch of quotes/meager analysis and facts from case 2] + [therefore,....]
This was me too. The last 15 minutes caught up to me QUICK - brutal. Also, totally wrote nothingness on charge 1 so whateva.
-
glasnost

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:38 pm
Post
by glasnost » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:45 am
long time lurker here. of ALL the things to be freaked out about, why is everyone worrying about examsoft or whatever not uploading??? We can submit all of the exams up until 12 pm Friday. Relax people!!!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
sundance95

- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Post
by sundance95 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:50 am
glasnost wrote:long time lurker here. of ALL the things to be freaked out about, why is everyone worrying about examsoft or whatever not uploading??? We can submit all of the exams up until 12 pm Friday. Relax people!!!
Me---> 'huh, exams not uploading...prolly server side, w/e'
Get on internet:
Rest of legal profession---->lost ark caliber facemelting
Althought tbf, id be freaking the fuck out if i was in one of those stupid states that require same night upload else zero
-
dtl

- Posts: 305
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:08 am
Post
by dtl » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:52 am
There were quite a few east coast states who had a set upload time of 9 pm, or they lost 10 points or w/e. They were the ones who were truly shitting bricks. Us California people have plenty of leeway.
-
glasnost

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:38 pm
Post
by glasnost » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:55 am
sundance95 wrote:glasnost wrote:long time lurker here. of ALL the things to be freaked out about, why is everyone worrying about examsoft or whatever not uploading??? We can submit all of the exams up until 12 pm Friday. Relax people!!!
Me---> 'huh, exams not uploading...prolly server side, w/e'
Get on internet:
Rest of legal profession---->lost ark caliber facemelting
Althought tbf, id be freaking the fuck out if i was in one of those stupid states that require same night upload else zero
haha no I get the people from the weirdo states freaking out (although even for them, most states pushed back the upload deadline). but people here were worried about examsoft.
I just wanted to reassure anyone who may not know that we have till Friday. Hell, if you listened to the instructions, even if you miss the Friday deadline, they won't start deducting points until next Monday or something.
-
dtl

- Posts: 305
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:08 am
Post
by dtl » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:57 am
glasnost wrote:sundance95 wrote:glasnost wrote:long time lurker here. of ALL the things to be freaked out about, why is everyone worrying about examsoft or whatever not uploading??? We can submit all of the exams up until 12 pm Friday. Relax people!!!
Me---> 'huh, exams not uploading...prolly server side, w/e'
Get on internet:
Rest of legal profession---->lost ark caliber facemelting
Althought tbf, id be freaking the fuck out if i was in one of those stupid states that require same night upload else zero
haha no I get the people from the weirdo states freaking out (although even for them, most states pushed back the upload deadline). but people here were worried about examsoft.
I just wanted to reassure anyone who may not know that we have till Friday. Hell, if you listened to the instructions, even if you miss the Friday deadline, they won't start deducting points until next Monday or something.
I heard pretty clearly that after Friday you get the 10 scaled points off. I could be wrong, but the Ontario ballroom speaker was relatively clear about it.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
lmr

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:22 am
Post
by lmr » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:01 am
glasnost wrote:sundance95 wrote:glasnost wrote:long time lurker here. of ALL the things to be freaked out about, why is everyone worrying about examsoft or whatever not uploading??? We can submit all of the exams up until 12 pm Friday. Relax people!!!
Me---> 'huh, exams not uploading...prolly server side, w/e'
Get on internet:
Rest of legal profession---->lost ark caliber facemelting
Althought tbf, id be freaking the fuck out if i was in one of those stupid states that require same night upload else zero
haha no I get the people from the weirdo states freaking out (although even for them, most states pushed back the upload deadline). but people here were worried about examsoft.
I just wanted to reassure anyone who may not know that we have till Friday. Hell, if you listened to the instructions, even if you miss the Friday deadline, they won't start deducting points until next Monday or something.
Yes I was freaking out-didn't remember the deadline-It's only idk the biggest exam of our lives are people not allowed to be anxious? You can lol at our hysteria but idk if it's that odd to be freaked out that your file isn't uploading thinking it may be a problem w your computer, that your exam deleted, that the deadline is in a couple hours. etc. I mean as a long time lurker this is what compelled you to want to come on here and post about? Seriously?
-
glasnost

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:38 pm
Post
by glasnost » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:02 am
dtl wrote:glasnost wrote:sundance95 wrote:glasnost wrote:long time lurker here. of ALL the things to be freaked out about, why is everyone worrying about examsoft or whatever not uploading??? We can submit all of the exams up until 12 pm Friday. Relax people!!!
Me---> 'huh, exams not uploading...prolly server side, w/e'
Get on internet:
Rest of legal profession---->lost ark caliber facemelting
Althought tbf, id be freaking the fuck out if i was in one of those stupid states that require same night upload else zero
haha no I get the people from the weirdo states freaking out (although even for them, most states pushed back the upload deadline). but people here were worried about examsoft.
I just wanted to reassure anyone who may not know that we have till Friday. Hell, if you listened to the instructions, even if you miss the Friday deadline, they won't start deducting points until next Monday or something.
I heard pretty clearly that after Friday you get the 10 scaled points off. I could be wrong, but the Ontario ballroom speaker was relatively clear about it.
maybe. honestly, my brain is kind of fucked. just upload thursday night and no worries! since we're one of the few states that has 3 day bar exams, hopefully the server thing won't be an issue.
-
sundance95

- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Post
by sundance95 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:03 am
All we're saying is that you should breathe into a paper bag for a sec
-
Determination3

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 11:20 am
Post
by Determination3 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:07 am
I hate to spring this on people, but I'm freaking out.
Was remedies a contract crossover? It just asked what Paul's remedies are, so I didn't talk about it.
I didn't go into a full K analysis ecxept for mentioning there was a breach and he had contract remedy rights.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
lmr

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:22 am
Post
by lmr » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:08 am
sundance95 wrote:All we're saying is that you should breathe into a paper bag for a sec

Spare me your condescension. Everything's uploaded-people were complaining a couple hours ago when the situation was new and unknown. Certainly not going to apologize for giving a shit.
-
lmr

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:22 am
Post
by lmr » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:09 am
Determination3 wrote:I hate to spring this on people, but I'm freaking out.
Was remedies a contract crossover? It just asked what Paul's remedies are, so I didn't talk about it.
I didn't go into a full K analysis ecxept for mentioning there was a breach and he had contract remedy rights.
No. It was a full remedies question. Facts clearly stated the K was valid and that D unjustifiably repudiated. They didn't want a K analysis.
-
sundance95

- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Post
by sundance95 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:16 am
lmr wrote:sundance95 wrote:All we're saying is that you should breathe into a paper bag for a sec

Spare me your condescension. Everything's uploaded-people were complaining a couple hours ago when the situation was new and unknown. Certainly not going to apologize for giving a shit.
giving a shit =/= losing your shit
-
Law-So-Hard

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:00 pm
Post
by Law-So-Hard » Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:18 am
The more tired I get, the more facts I missed from the essays come to me in flashes.
For instance, notice how I don't have a SIGNATURE attached to my avatar?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login