Thanks!Guchster wrote:Question 26 of Barbri (or Question 2 of July 2005 http://www.nybarexam.org/ExamQuestions/JUL2005QA.pdf)turquoiseturtle wrote:Thanks, 4 is what I was most confused on. Do you know any essays that tested this point specifically?Guchster wrote:Didn't meant to start a indelible counsel fight.
Based on a quick scan of the essays and answers of past bar exams, it looks like these are the important points:
1. It only attaches when D is in custody/arraigned/or involved in situations where the Sixth Amendment right to counsel would also attach.
2. Unlike Federal rights, once the above happens, the D himself doesn't have to ask for it--someone else can on his behalf (parent or legal guardian for a child, police have it in their records he has an attorney, attorney shows up before he's questioned but after he's brought in)
3. D can only waive it, if the police knows he's represented, IN THE PRESENCE of the attorney.
*4. The most tested point. Once D is released and later re-arrested for an unrelated charge (passes Blockburger), waiver can be made without the presence of counsel.
Issue Number 3
Reading over it now, examinee answer B is very direct. Not much A of IRAC in some of those sections.