I'm preparing to take the LSAT and hopefully start LS next year, but I'm not sure if this would be the best option. I want to go into (not employment-based) immigration law, ideally in public interest. I'm well aware this is not the most lucrative option, but it's the only thing I would want to do.
On the other hand, I've been working as a BIA accredited representative (see http://www.justice.gov/eoir/ra.htm for info on the BIA program) for the last few years. This has allowed me to gain experience while representing clients, and despite not having a JD. Thus, I don't know if it would make sense to still go for the JD.
My hesitations are mainly financial. I have a good job (which I love
) at a nonprofit and get paid pretty well (considering the industry), but would have to give it up and get into debt to pursue a JD. Even if a PT/evening program and/or scholarships are an option, I would still need loans. I've been looking at salaries for immigration attorneys in the nonprofit sector and they are not very far from what I make now (often 5-10k difference). I know that likely in the long run it would be better to have a JD to access better job prospects, etc., but would it be worth it?The other thing is timing. It's a very interesting time for immigration law and I may be "missing out" when I start school
I'm also 30 years old, which is not the worst age, but I'm not looking forward to looking for entry-level jobs when I'm 34-35.Any thoughts?
Thanks!
