Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs Forum
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:45 pm
Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
I'm looking for some advice. I would like to transition to a career in patent law. This is something I've been considering for the past 7 years. I posted this on another web forum, but I didn't get much feedback. My background is as follows:
I have a masters degree in Computer Science. I've been working as a software engineer for the past 7 years.
Do you think my background would be competitive for Technical Specialist/Science Advisor jobs? Thank you for your time.
I have a masters degree in Computer Science. I've been working as a software engineer for the past 7 years.
Do you think my background would be competitive for Technical Specialist/Science Advisor jobs? Thank you for your time.
Last edited by smc44 on Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 432435
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
Your English bachelors will probably keep you out of most top pros shops. Sorry. You might be able to find a job. I dunno. I've never really seen or heard of a resume like yours.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
Moved to correct forum.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:45 pm
Re: Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
Anonymous User wrote:Your English bachelors will probably keep you out of most top pros shops. Sorry. You might be able to find a job. I dunno. I've never really seen or heard of a resume like yours.
Thanks for your response. Although I do not have a bachelors in CS, I did have to take all the core courses before I entered a graduate program.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:45 pm
Re: Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
A. Nony Mouse wrote:Moved to correct forum.
I apologize for starting this in the wrong forum.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
No problem. But check the stickies at the top of a forum in future.smc44 wrote:A. Nony Mouse wrote:Moved to correct forum.
I apologize for starting this in the wrong forum.
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
The questions I primarily care about when looking at a potential patent agent/tech advisor candidate are: (a) can this person write well, (b) is this person technically astute and versatile (i.e., capable of quickly learning varied new technologies outside his/her comfort zone), and (c) is this person patent bar eligible? More or less in that order of elimination.
Patent bar eligible is the biggest hurdle for those with non-technical UG backgrounds. By solving that problem, you've neutralized a big concern. Quality of technical/legal writing is something prospective employers will want to see through a writing sample--I think the BA in English will suggest you don't have the problem most engineers do, but I would still want to see your writing before I decided.
The biggest concern would be technical aptitude and versatility. By selling the fact that you did most of the UG CS curriculum and have a number of years of practical experience, you can probably neutralize the rest of the knee-jerk skepticism a firm might have by simply looking at your first degree. My lingering concern would be to what extent, as a CS person with a software professional background, you'd be able to deal with hardware-related inventions. But I have that concern with all CS types; it's a function of that particular discipline and not how you got there.
TL;DR: Provided you had strong grades, I'd at least interview you for my prosecution practice, and I think a fair number of firms who regularly employ patent agents probably would also.
Patent bar eligible is the biggest hurdle for those with non-technical UG backgrounds. By solving that problem, you've neutralized a big concern. Quality of technical/legal writing is something prospective employers will want to see through a writing sample--I think the BA in English will suggest you don't have the problem most engineers do, but I would still want to see your writing before I decided.
The biggest concern would be technical aptitude and versatility. By selling the fact that you did most of the UG CS curriculum and have a number of years of practical experience, you can probably neutralize the rest of the knee-jerk skepticism a firm might have by simply looking at your first degree. My lingering concern would be to what extent, as a CS person with a software professional background, you'd be able to deal with hardware-related inventions. But I have that concern with all CS types; it's a function of that particular discipline and not how you got there.
TL;DR: Provided you had strong grades, I'd at least interview you for my prosecution practice, and I think a fair number of firms who regularly employ patent agents probably would also.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:45 pm
Re: Looking for Advice Regarding Tech Spec/Science Advisor Jobs
Thank you for your detailed response.mrsmartypants wrote:The questions I primarily care about when looking at a potential patent agent/tech advisor candidate are: (a) can this person write well, (b) is this person technically astute and versatile (i.e., capable of quickly learning varied new technologies outside his/her comfort zone), and (c) is this person patent bar eligible? More or less in that order of elimination.
Patent bar eligible is the biggest hurdle for those with non-technical UG backgrounds. By solving that problem, you've neutralized a big concern. Quality of technical/legal writing is something prospective employers will want to see through a writing sample--I think the BA in English will suggest you don't have the problem most engineers do, but I would still want to see your writing before I decided.
The biggest concern would be technical aptitude and versatility. By selling the fact that you did most of the UG CS curriculum and have a number of years of practical experience, you can probably neutralize the rest of the knee-jerk skepticism a firm might have by simply looking at your first degree. My lingering concern would be to what extent, as a CS person with a software professional background, you'd be able to deal with hardware-related inventions. But I have that concern with all CS types; it's a function of that particular discipline and not how you got there.
TL;DR: Provided you had strong grades, I'd at least interview you for my prosecution practice, and I think a fair number of firms who regularly employ patent agents probably would also.