Banned from law review for being a douche? Forum
-
Iloveyaourt

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Banned from law review for being a douche?
If someone (non editor, 3L or 2L) on law review thinks you're a douche, then could you be bared from law review even if you grade on?
Last edited by Iloveyaourt on Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
kahechsof

- Posts: 332
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
Doubt it. But you will still be a douche. Just a law review douche. Which is actually quite common.
-
Iloveyaourt

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
I see. This is a pure hypothetical and my over-analyzing things and thinking of worst case senarios.
I know some 1Ls are sucking up to law review people; so, I was wondering what would happen even if they don't like you.
I know some 1Ls are sucking up to law review people; so, I was wondering what would happen even if they don't like you.
-
kahechsof

- Posts: 332
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
Sound like douches. they'll fit right in.Iloveyaourt wrote:
I know some 1Ls are sucking up to law review people.
- Bildungsroman

- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
Those are objectively bad people. Don't worry about what they're doing.Iloveyaourt wrote:I know some 1Ls are sucking up to law review people;
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dreakol

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:56 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
I was under the impression that write ons for law review were anonymous at schools to prevent this
- JollyGreenGiant

- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
Correct.dreakol wrote:I was under the impression that write ons for law review were anonymous at schools to prevent this
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
Writing on is anonymous, but some of the current 2L staffers will have a say in who is part of the edboard after them (i.e. people who are 1Ls now). Thus, the people sucking up to Law Review people are not only people gunning for Law Review, but gunning for Law Review edboard two years out.dreakol wrote:I was under the impression that write ons for law review were anonymous at schools to prevent this
Ultimate gunning.
- TatteredDignity

- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
Does one get on the board solely through election, or does it depend on the school? How are various positions divvied up?
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Banned from law review for being a douche?
Depends on the school. Here, 2L staffers choose which edboard spots they want to compete for, I think they write a statement saying why they want to do what, and then the 3L edboard goes into a room and doesn't leave until the future edboard is set. Also, each current edboard has their own method for choosing the future edboard, but that information is not passed on. So every year there might be a slightly different mechanism by which the future edboard is chosen. It varies a lot from school to school though. At some law schools, even current 2L staffers have a hand in who gets chosen for the future edboard, which I think is kind of stupid since it seems like too much of a popularity contest. At other schools, the current edboard has a set voting process in place.0LNewbie wrote:Does one get on the board solely through election, or does it depend on the school? How are various positions divvied up?