They remove the money from your account and send it to your bank/cut you a check. Since the money is being removed from the account, it's a charge. Is this the first year you've had loans, bro?jbagelboy wrote:Does anyone know what "Title IV Student Refund" means and why it shows up as a charge on the account, not a credit?
Columbia students taking questions Forum
- John_Luther1989
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 11:10 am
Re: Columbia students taking questions
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
So 2L and 3L fall I received a small "credit" equal to surplus of my loans over the amount due (tuition + fees - scholarship). That credit then disburses into my checking account via direct deposit. This is different: on the right side of the ledger on SSOL, a charge for about $1,200 appeared with no corresponding direct deposit or money received by me. Is the school giving me $1,200 or charging me $1,200 additional? Maybe I just have to wait and see if anything hits my bank acct?John_Luther1989 wrote:They remove the money from your account and send it to your bank/cut you a check. Since the money is being removed from the account, it's a charge. Is this the first year you've had loans, bro?jbagelboy wrote:Does anyone know what "Title IV Student Refund" means and why it shows up as a charge on the account, not a credit?
I don't understand why its happening in late March.
ETA: called and figured it out. no worries
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Any good supplement recommendations for Shechtman's Criminal Adjudication class? His "random cases in textbook he hates + coursepack" approach has me all kinds of scatterbrained.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Columbia students taking questions
I think I just used the E&E and it covered most of what he did.ph5354a wrote:Any good supplement recommendations for Shechtman's Criminal Adjudication class? His "random cases in textbook he hates + coursepack" approach has me all kinds of scatterbrained.
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Could anyone speak to clinic applications? Apart from the Human Rights or Immigration clinic, do the applications have to be extremely thought-out or exceed a page?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:00 am
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Any advice on how to find someone to sublet to this summer?
- White Dwarf
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:54 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Skipped my afternoon classes to grind out a bunch of cover letters for summer jobs. 5 hours, and a dozen sent applications later, I got an offer via email from my top choice, where I interviewed right before spring break.
Just glad that's over with. Really under-estimated the stress of finding a summer job.
Just glad that's over with. Really under-estimated the stress of finding a summer job.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
All the 1L job search (which was lol, but not as lol as the actual job spending most of the day mass mailing) taught me was that most of the do-gooder PI places are completely full of shit.White Dwarf wrote:Skipped my afternoon classes to grind out a bunch of cover letters for summer jobs. 5 hours, and a dozen sent applications later, I got an offer via email from my top choice, where I interviewed right before spring break.
Just glad that's over with. Really under-estimated the stress of finding a summer job.
"We can't serve all of our clients due to being understaffed, we're backlogged for months, we really need as many people as possible working on these cases."
"Oh that's cool. Can I work for you for free?"
"LOLNO DING"
-
- Posts: 3592
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:55 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Right, cause supervising and training dumb 1Ls doesn't take a bunch of their timeMonochromatic Oeuvre wrote:All the 1L job search (which was lol, but not as lol as the actual job spending most of the day mass mailing) taught me was that most of the do-gooder PI places are completely full of shit.White Dwarf wrote:Skipped my afternoon classes to grind out a bunch of cover letters for summer jobs. 5 hours, and a dozen sent applications later, I got an offer via email from my top choice, where I interviewed right before spring break.
Just glad that's over with. Really under-estimated the stress of finding a summer job.
"We can't serve all of our clients due to being understaffed, we're backlogged for months, we really need as many people as possible working on these cases."
"Oh that's cool. Can I work for you for free?"
"LOLNO DING"
Last edited by GreenEggs on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
As I recall, the interns were given a 30-minute intro to what the organization did, where to file shit, and what things you're not supposed to ask domestic violence victims. Everything else was, theoretically, in a giant binder they gave us. I never heard from the woman that gave that lecture at any point in the next 10 weeks.
There wasn't a lot of training necessary because most of the job was helping barely English-literate green card holders and illegal immigrants to fill out basic forms. Not that they really gave a fuck. I mean, more power to the noble doing good work when most of us will undoubtedly make the world a worse place, but everyone peaced out at like 4:30 and were basically done working by 3.
But if you don't get a 1L SA (and you probably won't), you might as well get one of these DGAF jobs. If one of the 200+ mass mails I had sent during that job wound up being the job I relied on, I would've forever thanked my lucky stars to not be whatever it is the strivers do.
ETA: Worth mentioning: Regular practice was to just outright make shit up to fit within guidelines. If you had to arrive before Date X to keep your food stamps for example, the attorney would say something like "If you arrived before Date X, you're eligible for food stamps. Now what date did you arrive smuggled in the back of a truck?" The ones whose English was better usually caught on. If their English wasn't so good, then sometimes they'd say "after Date X" and the attorney would make a second attempt, saying "Now I want to be clear--on this form that we're filing, I am going to type the date you tell me you arrived in the U.S. If that date is before Date X, you will get to keep your food stamps. If it's after Date X, you will not be eligible for food stamps. Now Mrs. Client, can you tell me, what date did you arrive in the U.S.?"
There wasn't a lot of training necessary because most of the job was helping barely English-literate green card holders and illegal immigrants to fill out basic forms. Not that they really gave a fuck. I mean, more power to the noble doing good work when most of us will undoubtedly make the world a worse place, but everyone peaced out at like 4:30 and were basically done working by 3.
But if you don't get a 1L SA (and you probably won't), you might as well get one of these DGAF jobs. If one of the 200+ mass mails I had sent during that job wound up being the job I relied on, I would've forever thanked my lucky stars to not be whatever it is the strivers do.
ETA: Worth mentioning: Regular practice was to just outright make shit up to fit within guidelines. If you had to arrive before Date X to keep your food stamps for example, the attorney would say something like "If you arrived before Date X, you're eligible for food stamps. Now what date did you arrive smuggled in the back of a truck?" The ones whose English was better usually caught on. If their English wasn't so good, then sometimes they'd say "after Date X" and the attorney would make a second attempt, saying "Now I want to be clear--on this form that we're filing, I am going to type the date you tell me you arrived in the U.S. If that date is before Date X, you will get to keep your food stamps. If it's after Date X, you will not be eligible for food stamps. Now Mrs. Client, can you tell me, what date did you arrive in the U.S.?"
- BizBro
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:21 am
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Legitimate question: How bad will it hurt to lose dean's cup two years in a row?
- RSN
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Not as bad as being stuck at US News #6 seven years in a rowBizBro wrote:Legitimate question: How bad will it hurt to lose dean's cup two years in a row?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Only 20 students a year or so are clerking (which, by the way, is a shitty idea for 95% of people). Most of the AIII clerks are Stone.
If you could elaborate, why is clerking such a bad idea?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Actually, like 50 people per year are clerking, they just aren't all starting immediately after graduation. Historically about 18% of the class will eventually clerk.goingtoschool wrote:Only 20 students a year or so are clerking (which, by the way, is a shitty idea for 95% of people). Most of the AIII clerks are Stone.
If you could elaborate, why is clerking such a bad idea?
Clerking is practically useless for corporate attorneys, and probably 3/4 of CLS students are going transactional/corporate.
Last edited by jbagelboy on Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 5:31 am
Re: Columbia students taking questions
I'm sure like most internships, experiences vary widely. Just because one particular PI group seemed lax doesn't mean that most "most do-gooder PI places are completely full of shit."Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:As I recall, the interns were given a 30-minute intro to what the organization did, where to file shit, and what things you're not supposed to ask domestic violence victims. Everything else was, theoretically, in a giant binder they gave us. I never heard from the woman that gave that lecture at any point in the next 10 weeks.
There wasn't a lot of training necessary because most of the job was helping barely English-literate green card holders and illegal immigrants to fill out basic forms. Not that they really gave a fuck. I mean, more power to the noble doing good work when most of us will undoubtedly make the world a worse place, but everyone peaced out at like 4:30 and were basically done working by 3.
But if you don't get a 1L SA (and you probably won't), you might as well get one of these DGAF jobs. If one of the 200+ mass mails I had sent during that job wound up being the job I relied on, I would've forever thanked my lucky stars to not be whatever it is the strivers do.
ETA: Worth mentioning: Regular practice was to just outright make shit up to fit within guidelines. If you had to arrive before Date X to keep your food stamps for example, the attorney would say something like "If you arrived before Date X, you're eligible for food stamps. Now what date did you arrive smuggled in the back of a truck?" The ones whose English was better usually caught on. If their English wasn't so good, then sometimes they'd say "after Date X" and the attorney would make a second attempt, saying "Now I want to be clear--on this form that we're filing, I am going to type the date you tell me you arrived in the U.S. If that date is before Date X, you will get to keep your food stamps. If it's after Date X, you will not be eligible for food stamps. Now Mrs. Client, can you tell me, what date did you arrive in the U.S.?"
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 5:31 am
Re: Columbia students taking questions
I think the idea is that its mostly just a resume sticker/preftige thing. It's a good experience and signals that you're qualified. But in the end, if you're going to work for a firm, is it really a year better spent than a year working for the firm? I think if you want to go into academia it might help, but that's not the 95% of people. I guess put another way, if you're going to be an M&A lawyer, which is better, spending a year doing M&A work as an associate or spending a year researching random cases as a clerk?goingtoschool wrote:Only 20 students a year or so are clerking (which, by the way, is a shitty idea for 95% of people). Most of the AIII clerks are Stone.
If you could elaborate, why is clerking such a bad idea?
- nicknar
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:49 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
Does anyone know whether the guaranteed housing for all law students applies to couples housing as well? And if not, do married couples get priority? (My SO and I aren't married but are already living together and we co-own a vehicle, which appears to qualify us, but I wonder if that makes us a lower priority somehow)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- RSN
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
For transactional, no real point to being a Westlaw fiend for a year (except to escape temporarily from biglaw), but for litigation, it's both a skill and credential builder. Speakers at more than a few lunch talks I've been to have said aspiring litigators should at least strongly consider clerking, and most of them say their own clerkships were among the best experiences of their legal careers.stoopkid13 wrote:I think the idea is that its mostly just a resume sticker/preftige thing. It's a good experience and signals that you're qualified. But in the end, if you're going to work for a firm, is it really a year better spent than a year working for the firm? I think if you want to go into academia it might help, but that's not the 95% of people. I guess put another way, if you're going to be an M&A lawyer, which is better, spending a year doing M&A work as an associate or spending a year researching random cases as a clerk?goingtoschool wrote:Only 20 students a year or so are clerking (which, by the way, is a shitty idea for 95% of people). Most of the AIII clerks are Stone.
If you could elaborate, why is clerking such a bad idea?
Also, clerkship bonus is $$
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
you lose more than you get backLetsGoMets wrote:
Also, clerkship bonus is $$
but it'll help you lateral and is good signaling
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
They're not full of shit because they were lax. Matter of fact, they're the only ones I can verify as not full of shit because they actually hired a bunch of interns hoping to make a dent in their backlog. The ones that are full of shit are the ones who claim to need SO MUCH HELP! and are understaffed and can't do half of what they would like who then turn around and go "Um, a B in Torts? Excuse me, we have standards here."stoopkid13 wrote:I'm sure like most internships, experiences vary widely. Just because one particular PI group seemed lax doesn't mean that most "most do-gooder PI places are completely full of shit."Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:As I recall, the interns were given a 30-minute intro to what the organization did, where to file shit, and what things you're not supposed to ask domestic violence victims. Everything else was, theoretically, in a giant binder they gave us. I never heard from the woman that gave that lecture at any point in the next 10 weeks.
There wasn't a lot of training necessary because most of the job was helping barely English-literate green card holders and illegal immigrants to fill out basic forms. Not that they really gave a fuck. I mean, more power to the noble doing good work when most of us will undoubtedly make the world a worse place, but everyone peaced out at like 4:30 and were basically done working by 3.
But if you don't get a 1L SA (and you probably won't), you might as well get one of these DGAF jobs. If one of the 200+ mass mails I had sent during that job wound up being the job I relied on, I would've forever thanked my lucky stars to not be whatever it is the strivers do.
ETA: Worth mentioning: Regular practice was to just outright make shit up to fit within guidelines. If you had to arrive before Date X to keep your food stamps for example, the attorney would say something like "If you arrived before Date X, you're eligible for food stamps. Now what date did you arrive smuggled in the back of a truck?" The ones whose English was better usually caught on. If their English wasn't so good, then sometimes they'd say "after Date X" and the attorney would make a second attempt, saying "Now I want to be clear--on this form that we're filing, I am going to type the date you tell me you arrived in the U.S. If that date is before Date X, you will get to keep your food stamps. If it's after Date X, you will not be eligible for food stamps. Now Mrs. Client, can you tell me, what date did you arrive in the U.S.?"
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
You give up a tangible cost (about $45k on net) for a credential that maybe makes you a marginally better associate (but who cares, you're not making partner, so the chance of your quality being materially relevant to your Biglaw career is minimal) and maybe makes you marginally more marketable (but you were already preftigious enough to clerk, so I'm not sure it's helping besides the fact that other people are getting it and you've sucked yourself into an arms race). And any possible benefit to your marketability is dwarfed by the marketability you already lost, because LOL, you decided to be a litigator in 2016.stoopkid13 wrote:I think the idea is that its mostly just a resume sticker/preftige thing. It's a good experience and signals that you're qualified. But in the end, if you're going to work for a firm, is it really a year better spent than a year working for the firm? I think if you want to go into academia it might help, but that's not the 95% of people. I guess put another way, if you're going to be an M&A lawyer, which is better, spending a year doing M&A work as an associate or spending a year researching random cases as a clerk?goingtoschool wrote:Only 20 students a year or so are clerking (which, by the way, is a shitty idea for 95% of people). Most of the AIII clerks are Stone.
If you could elaborate, why is clerking such a bad idea?
In general, consider me a giant skeptic of anything hawked by Boomers with a large upfront cost and vaguely-described "benefits" that no one seems to be able to quantify.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:49 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
I used the Off Campus Student Housing Sublet posting site that they sent emails about and got a call from someone literally within two hours of my post being approved and being up on their list. So if you're in UAH definitely post it there.GoneSouth wrote:Any advice on how to find someone to sublet to this summer?
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
suck itBizBro wrote:Legitimate question: How bad will it hurt to lose dean's cup two years in a row?
- White Dwarf
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:54 pm
Re: Columbia students taking questions
How competitive is Dean's Cup in terms of talent level?
I played some in college (on a bad D3 team), and was going to try-out, but had a prior commitment this week.
I played some in college (on a bad D3 team), and was going to try-out, but had a prior commitment this week.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:00 am
Re: Columbia students taking questions
What's the deal with NYU supposedly pulling out of the Deans' Cup next year? Pretty lamejbagelboy wrote:suck itBizBro wrote:Legitimate question: How bad will it hurt to lose dean's cup two years in a row?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login