

#18 isn't that close to regents. I mean, it's close enough. But #25, 26, and 27 (and that cluster) are much closer.lawschool2014hopeful wrote:Went through the thread the 2nd time for housing questions. Thanks for all the responses so far.
I am currently looking at some graduated school housing, particularly #18 on http://rp.uchicago.edu/graduate_housing/locations.shtml
The reason is that #18 appears to be fairly close to regents, with a significantly cheaper tag.
However after looking at a map of Chicago, it appears to be a train crossing or something of the sort between #18/graduated housing and Regents, would that mean it is impossible to walk over there?
Is it practical at all to live in one the graduated school housing and expect to be within SAFE walking distance to regent (under 10mins)?
Or should I follow the herd and go Regents? (I am leaning towards this because I would know literally nobody in Chicago and its surrounding states, but I am bit turned off by the apparently problems with new management and the constant noise from renovation).
Furthermore, it seems like is impossible to find an apartment for Regents in July given their 14 day holding policy. Should I be worried of not being able to finding a studio available in Mid-August in Regents?
Thanks for answering the questions!
Sorry I am map-stupid, you are right the 25 clusters are much closer. Thanks for answering!beepboopbeep wrote:
#18 isn't that close to regents. I mean, it's close enough. But #25, 26, and 27 (and that cluster) are much closer.
Dude, it's not the Berlin wall. The metra does run along the east edge of Lake Park. You can cross under bridges at 51st, 53rd, 55th, 56th, and 57th.
Basically anything on the east/north side of hyde park is safe walking distance to the regents area. Also, there are shuttles that run at night, every 15-20m. The East is the one you'll be looking at.
Can't speak to the Regents questions. It doesn't seem like people had a problem securing a lease last year.
I hope that means she's done grading. In terms of timeliness, she was the one I was most worried about.orbotop wrote:wow reading Wood's memo for the exam, im not sure what exam i took!!!![]()
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
1. Is the memo on Chalk? I'm not seeing it.Regulus wrote:Dammit why did you have to tell us the memo is up. I cannot resist reading a prof's memo even if it just makes me extremely depressed until grades come out.Rahviveh wrote:I hope that means she's done grading. In terms of timeliness, she was the one I was most worried about.orbotop wrote:wow reading Wood's memo for the exam, im not sure what exam i took!!!![]()
And just for the record, her test sucked almost as much as her class.
http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/law/courses/exams/ummmno wrote:1. Is the memo on Chalk? I'm not seeing it.
I like this method: http://abovethelaw.com/2012/05/top-law- ... g-faculty/Mal Reynolds wrote:They should out the professors who turn in exams late.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Suppose this means we can take one fewer class?Rahviveh wrote:Unbelievable. I would have done the write-on if I knew this was gonna happen. What great timing.
That's what it sounds like. This makes me consider Moot Court though.Crowing wrote:Suppose this means we can take one fewer class?Rahviveh wrote:Unbelievable. I would have done the write-on if I knew this was gonna happen. What great timing.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I did the competition because I didn't want to regret anything. Now this makes it more likely I'll actually join a journal if accepted. This seems particularly great for canceling out the workloads of secondary journals. LR doesn't seem like it'll be that much better.Regulus wrote:lol yeah I'm just glad that I have no interest in a journal whatsoever because I would have been pissed if I had even the slightest interest and found this out after the fact; that was a big douche move on the part of the school IMO.Rahviveh wrote:Unbelievable. I would have done the write-on if I knew this was gonna happen. What great timing.
Fair enough. What's the workload like for Moot Court?2014 wrote:Journals either make sense or don't for your goals it's pretty binary. There is no person who should be pushed one way or the other by credit. They require far more work than a 3 credit class does too, by a magnitude of like 3 for secondaries to upwards of 10 for LR.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Didn't participate but I gathered it was very manageable compared to journals.Rahviveh wrote:Fair enough. What's the workload like for Moot Court?2014 wrote:Journals either make sense or don't for your goals it's pretty binary. There is no person who should be pushed one way or the other by credit. They require far more work than a 3 credit class does too, by a magnitude of like 3 for secondaries to upwards of 10 for LR.
Haha, sorry guys. Wish I could have, but they would have flayed me. Could be worse - you could be me! Boy did I enjoy writing that Comment for nothing.Rahviveh wrote:That's what it sounds like. This makes me consider Moot Court though.Crowing wrote:Suppose this means we can take one fewer class?Rahviveh wrote:Unbelievable. I would have done the write-on if I knew this was gonna happen. What great timing.
WhenInLaw you could have warned us buddy
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login