hopefully. details?TTT-LS wrote:My impression is that the whole shebang might have just been a big, but well-intentioned, misunderstanding.
Northwestern 1L/2L/3L/Grads Taking Questions and Challenges Forum
-
ANON3333

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:13 am
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
- TTT-LS

- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
.
Last edited by TTT-LS on Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
ANON3333

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:13 am
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
.
Last edited by ANON3333 on Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
luckyjd

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Someone at Feinberg told me that a student or someone "saw" a man with a gun and called the police. Very well could have been nothing... But anyways, people who are accepted, please don't go so you can free up spots for me.
Thank you.
-
gollymolly

- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:32 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
That was what I figured too.TTT-LS wrote:My impression is that the whole shebang might have just been a big, but well-intentioned, misunderstanding.
I was over all very impressed with how they handled it and the emergency alerts, but was it really necessary to hold classes in the afternoon when some students still couldn't get in to school and some students had just been locked in the library for three hours? Like, just cancel classes for the day.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hmlee

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
From what I heard, it was a faculty member who called it in and not a student. I would love to believe that it was a misunderstanding but... given the strength of the police / FBI response I strongly suspect that they believed the witness to be credible enough to consider it real and dangerous.
-
luckyjd

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
So... I've been waiting patiently for over a month for my application to go complete. I finally emailed the admissions office to inquire, and Greg Wenz wrote back saying my status has changed. I checked and it was still "received electronically" please wait four weeks for it to arrive blah blah...
Did you guys experience this kind of long wait? How might I go about inquiring again without sounding like a whiny, impatient person? Because I've seen no change in my status at all...
Did you guys experience this kind of long wait? How might I go about inquiring again without sounding like a whiny, impatient person? Because I've seen no change in my status at all...
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Odd. I went complete in less than a day.luckyjd wrote:So... I've been waiting patiently for over a month for my application to go complete. I finally emailed the admissions office to inquire, and Greg Wenz wrote back saying my status has changed. I checked and it was still "received electronically" please wait four weeks for it to arrive blah blah...
Did you guys experience this kind of long wait? How might I go about inquiring again without sounding like a whiny, impatient person? Because I've seen no change in my status at all...
-
luckyjd

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
- tome

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:17 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
I also think it was at best a misunderstanding, at worst a malicious hoax. The story is just so implausible: a guy walks into a building that has almost no security with a gun in his pants instead of in a bag or something, stays long enough to be seen, and then promptly fucks off without using it? I guess maybe he got cold feet when someone saw him or something, but still seems very odd.hmlee wrote:From what I heard, it was a faculty member who called it in and not a student. I would love to believe that it was a misunderstanding but... given the strength of the police / FBI response I strongly suspect that they believed the witness to be credible enough to consider it real and dangerous.
I wonder if the person who saw him asked "Are you by any chance happy to see me?"
- Dick Whitman

- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:55 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
A police officer told me the description given was very specific, which lead them to believe the credibility of the report.hmlee wrote:From what I heard, it was a faculty member who called it in and not a student. I would love to believe that it was a misunderstanding but... given the strength of the police / FBI response I strongly suspect that they believed the witness to be credible enough to consider it real and dangerous.
I don't doubt there was someone with a gun; I do doubt they had any ulterior motives. They probably just carried a gun somewhere they shouldn't have.
- tome

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:17 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Perhaps, but this is Chicago, not Dallas. You pretty much can't take a gun anywhere in this city I thought. It is hard to imagine someone taking a gun with them by accident or without a motive.Dick Whitman wrote:A police officer told me the description given was very specific, which lead them to believe the credibility of the report.hmlee wrote:From what I heard, it was a faculty member who called it in and not a student. I would love to believe that it was a misunderstanding but... given the strength of the police / FBI response I strongly suspect that they believed the witness to be credible enough to consider it real and dangerous.
I don't doubt there was someone with a gun; I do doubt they had any ulterior motives. They probably just carried a gun somewhere they shouldn't have.
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Handguns are banned in Chicago, even in your house, at least until McDonald vs. Chicago gets decided.tome wrote:Perhaps, but this is Chicago, not Dallas. You pretty much can't take a gun anywhere in this city I thought. It is hard to imagine someone taking a gun with them by accident or without a motive.Dick Whitman wrote:A police officer told me the description given was very specific, which lead them to believe the credibility of the report.hmlee wrote:From what I heard, it was a faculty member who called it in and not a student. I would love to believe that it was a misunderstanding but... given the strength of the police / FBI response I strongly suspect that they believed the witness to be credible enough to consider it real and dangerous.
I don't doubt there was someone with a gun; I do doubt they had any ulterior motives. They probably just carried a gun somewhere they shouldn't have.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Drew2010

- Posts: 418
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:21 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Will you hate me if I hope McDonald wins? (I'm going off the assumption he wants to be able to own a handgun)Desert Fox wrote: Handguns are banned in Chicago, even in your house, at least until McDonald vs. Chicago gets decided.
- Drew2010

- Posts: 418
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:21 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Would any current students have any idea when we could expect the Fall 09 employment data to be released? Do you remember about what time of year last year data was released?
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Nope, I think banning guns even in the home goes too far. But I drink far too often to keep a gun, I'd probably kill myself.Drew2010 wrote:Will you hate me if I hope McDonald wins? (I'm going off the assumption he wants to be able to own a handgun)Desert Fox wrote: Handguns are banned in Chicago, even in your house, at least until McDonald vs. Chicago gets decided.
Also, it doesn't seem top stop the murder rate in Chicago.
- hmlee

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
I think the question isn't whether it stops the murder rate... but whether the murder rate will increase or decrease if McDonald wins.Desert Fox wrote:Nope, I think banning guns even in the home goes too far. But I drink far too often to keep a gun, I'd probably kill myself.Drew2010 wrote:Will you hate me if I hope McDonald wins? (I'm going off the assumption he wants to be able to own a handgun)Desert Fox wrote: Handguns are banned in Chicago, even in your house, at least until McDonald vs. Chicago gets decided.
Also, it doesn't seem top stop the murder rate in Chicago.
We shall see.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
ANON3333

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:13 am
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
I know this is getting way off-topic, but interesting article about Mr. Mcdonald in the chicago tribune today.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... 2673.story
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... 2673.story
- NayBoer

- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Horrendously off topic now, but maybe somebody did an analysis like this for DC post-Heller.hmlee wrote:I think the question isn't whether it stops the murder rate... but whether the murder rate will increase or decrease if McDonald wins.
We shall see.
- hmlee

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Has it been long enough beyond Heller to have meaningful data on that point? I mean you'd have to give some time for the gun quantity in the city to increase...NayBoer wrote:Horrendously off topic now, but maybe somebody did an analysis like this for DC post-Heller.hmlee wrote:I think the question isn't whether it stops the murder rate... but whether the murder rate will increase or decrease if McDonald wins.
We shall see.
- TTT-LS

- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
.
Last edited by TTT-LS on Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
I loled.TTT-LS wrote:Goddammit. Who's the asshole who forwarded the listserv thing to ATL? If it was a TLSer, I'd really be disappointed. I didn't participate in that listserv discussion, but I did find parts of it amusing. Regardless of what you thought, the right response was certainly not to make it a matter of national legal news.
- hmlee

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
Not me. Though it's clear that someone is trying to ensure we appear on ATL at least once a month.
-
86revolt

- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:33 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
I have an on-campus interview at NU on March 4. Thinking about staying in the area through the weekend to explore the town and get a feel for the environment. Are there any 1/2/3Ls who have some time to burn on the weekend and can show me around? deep dish pizza? sports bars? or whatever else it is that NU students do on a thu/fri/sat?
- Drew2010

- Posts: 418
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:21 pm
Re: Northwestern 1L taking questions
This reminds me, thoughts on the current NU bashing on ATL and Leiter’s blog (regarding the Dean's comments about schools ranked below 70).. Would appreciate some input from current studentsTTT-LS wrote:Goddammit. Who's the asshole who forwarded the listserv thing to ATL? If it was a TLSer, I'd really be disappointed. I didn't participate in that listserv discussion, but I did find parts of it amusing. Regardless of what you thought, the right response was certainly not to make it a matter of national legal news.
Last edited by Drew2010 on Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login