Biglaw firing tendencies Forum

A forum for applicants and admitted students to ask law students and graduates about law school and the practice of law.
wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:34 pm

anyriotgirl wrote:
wreek wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:I thought I smelled boomer.
Not a boomer. Feels like it though!
at the very youngest you're 50 and at the oldest, you're idk let's say 70

that's close enough to boomer for me
I take it no one likes boomers around here? lol
Last edited by wreek on Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:37 pm

seespotrun wrote:
wreek wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:I thought I smelled boomer.
Not a boomer. Feels like it though!
Just a child prodigy. Nothing to see here, folks. A 35 y.o. with 30 years of prosecutorial experience.
Now I'm just going to mess with guys about my age. I'm between 45 and 49.

I'd LOVE to be 35 again!!!

NYSprague

Silver
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:33 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by NYSprague » Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:39 pm

^^^
We have an interesting and informative thread on Boomer hate you may want to peruse are some point.

wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:44 pm

Ah, I see. I may be close to being a boomer but I always thought like a blue-collared, Gen-X stoner. Made for some very interesting office conversations. And lots of arguing and headbutting!!

Hutz_and_Goodman

Gold
Posts: 1651
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by Hutz_and_Goodman » Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:48 pm

Is specializing in litigation as a biglaw associate a suicide mission?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by anyriotgirl » Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:02 pm

wreek wrote:Ah, I see. I may be close to being a boomer but I always thought like a blue-collared, Gen-X stoner. Made for some very interesting office conversations. And lots of arguing and headbutting!!
you still smell like a boomer to me

User avatar
heythatslife

Silver
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:18 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by heythatslife » Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:04 pm

wreek wrote:Ah, I see. I may be close to being a boomer but I always thought like a blue-collared, Gen-X stoner. Made for some very interesting office conversations. And lots of arguing and headbutting!!
Hate to break it to you, old man, but here you sound exactly like a boomer trying to fit in so hard and so awkwardly with a younger crowd.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by El Pollito » Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:14 pm

Hey wreek I think you have undisguised borderline personality disorder.

Theopliske8711

Gold
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:21 am

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by Theopliske8711 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:37 pm

Damn, the attention whore is going hard in this thread.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


09042014

Diamond
Posts: 18203
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by 09042014 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:41 pm

Chrstgtr wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
rayiner wrote:
SemiReverseSplinter wrote:There seems to be a lot of people who say that associates don't last long in large firms.

I guess I just want more elaboration on this topic. I understand there are long hours as well as large and sometimes boring workloads. So I'm not too curious about why people might leave of their own volition. What I'm more curious of is why do large firms tend to fire so many associates? Or is this exaggerated? I haven't seen statistics on this but it seems to be a real concern on this forum.

Disclaimer: 0L
As a practical matter, firms need large numbers of junior associates to do drudge work, smaller number of midlevels to do substantive work, and smaller still numbers of senior associates to supervise. So they hire large entry-level classes, then depend on voluntary or sometimes involuntary attrition to "right size" each class year. Firms don't generally fire people. Instead, they encourage people to leave gradually through negative performance reviews, and talks about how they don't have a future at the firm.

You might ask: why don't they just keep people around doing the same work? The danger of that is that without a chance of advancement, your good people will leave, while those who can't find anything better will stick around.
Firms will fire people. Not on the spot, but they'll give you 3-6 months to find something else or you get fired.
All so the firm doesn't make headlines for mass firings and we don't have to list being fired on our resumes. What a swell deal.
It's not just headlines. If you just got fucking sacked without warning, everyone would be afraid as fuck to get fired. They'd leave ASAP. This way you at least know when you are going to get taken to the farm, you'll have time to prepare.

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by 84651846190 » Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:55 pm

Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:Is specializing in litigation as a biglaw associate a suicide mission?
What do you mean by this?

wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:03 pm

heythatslife wrote:
wreek wrote:Ah, I see. I may be close to being a boomer but I always thought like a blue-collared, Gen-X stoner. Made for some very interesting office conversations. And lots of arguing and headbutting!!
Hate to break it to you, old man, but here you sound exactly like a boomer trying to fit in so hard and so awkwardly with a younger crowd.
*shrugs*

I have never fit in anywhere. That's a good thing.
Last edited by wreek on Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:06 pm

El Pollito wrote:Hey wreek I think you have undisguised borderline personality disorder.
Ooh, flaming. Nice.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:08 pm

Theopliske8711 wrote:Damn, the attention whore is going hard in this thread.
Oh, you, too? Whatever. :lol:

wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:12 pm

anyriotgirl wrote:
wreek wrote:Ah, I see. I may be close to being a boomer but I always thought like a blue-collared, Gen-X stoner. Made for some very interesting office conversations. And lots of arguing and headbutting!!
you still smell like a boomer to me
Probably because I'm nearly twice your age. I'm very curious about this boomer hate. What gives?

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by El Pollito » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:12 pm

wreek wrote:
El Pollito wrote:Hey wreek I think you have undisguised borderline personality disorder.
Ooh, flaming. Nice.
No, I'm serious.

wreek

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by wreek » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:15 pm

El Pollito wrote:
wreek wrote:
El Pollito wrote:Hey wreek I think you have undisguised borderline personality disorder.
Ooh, flaming. Nice.
No, I'm serious.
Well, if you're serious, get it right. I have an authority issue.

I'm curious about this boomer hate. Do tell.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
ScottRiqui

Gold
Posts: 3633
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by ScottRiqui » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:22 pm

El Pollito wrote:Hey wreek I think you have undisguised borderline personality disorder.
Was the bolded an autocorrect from "undiagnosed"? Because if so, that's pretty 180.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by El Pollito » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:38 pm

ScottRiqui wrote:
El Pollito wrote:Hey wreek I think you have undisguised borderline personality disorder.
Was the bolded an autocorrect from "undiagnosed"? Because if so, that's pretty 180.
Yup, I didn't even notice until now.

User avatar
Gooner91

Silver
Posts: 1377
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Biglaw firing tendencies

Post by Gooner91 » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:47 pm

anyriotgirl wrote:
wreek wrote:Ah, I see. I may be close to being a boomer but I always thought like a blue-collared, Gen-X stoner. Made for some very interesting office conversations. And lots of arguing and headbutting!!
you still smell like a boomer to me
I saw someone refer to this as being an Uncle Xavier in the other thread.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Ask a Law Student / Graduate”