Was Doctor king a dueshbag? Forum

suits00 · Post by **suits00** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:30 am

Btw--I finally figured out the answer to your earlier post. Please become a Chirporactor. With reasoning like that you'd be f*cked as an attorney (assuming you could even pass the LSAT, law school, and BAR).

chiro · Post by **chiro** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:30 am

suits00 wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?

Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.
Can someone translate for me?

Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?

kalvano · Post by **kalvano** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:30 am

suits00 wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?

Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.
Can someone translate for me?

suits00 · Post by **suits00** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:31 am

chiro wrote:
suits00 wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?

Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.
Can someone translate for me?
Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?

No, it's your faulty reasoning that I can't understand. Btw--it's "REVOKED", not "revocated".

chiro · Post by **chiro** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:31 am

170, and not on any silly childs pretest either.
Thanks for the opinion though. Much appreciated.

suits00 wrote:Btw--I finally figured out the answer to your earlier post. Please become a Chirporactor. With reasoning like that you'd be f*cked as an attorney (assuming you could even pass the LSAT, law school, and BAR).

chiro · Post by **chiro** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:06 am

Well, Saint or otherwise at least the mans dream lives on.......

http://news.yahoo.com/samuel-l-jackson- ... 06076.html

According to the New York Post, the "Pulp Fiction" legend repeatedly dropped the N-word during his cover story interview.

“I voted for Barack because he was black. ’Cuz that’s why other folks vote for other people — because they look like them,” Jackson said. "That’s American politics, pure and simple. [Obama’s] message didn’t mean sh-t to me. In the end, he’s a politician. I just hoped he would do some of what he said he was gonna do."

“When it comes down to it, they wouldn’t have elected a [bleep]," Jackson said. "Because, what’s a [bleep]? A [bleep] is scary. Obama ain’t scary at all. [Bleeps] don’t have beers at the White House. [Bleeps] don’t let some white dude, while you in the middle of a speech, call [him] a liar" -- an apparent reference to Rep. Joe Wilson's "You lie!" outburst during Obama's health care address to a joint session of Congress in 2009.

Jackson continued, "A [bleep] would have stopped the meeting right there and said, ‘Who the [bleep] said that?’ I hope Obama gets scary in the next four years, ’cuz he ain’t gotta worry about getting re-elected.”

Defending his repeated use of the racial epithet, Jackson said it "became a part of my vocabulary when I was born."

chiro · Post by **chiro** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:27 am

chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?

Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.

Can someone translate for me?[/quote]

Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?[/quote]

No, it's your faulty reasoning that I can't understand. Btw--it's "REVOKED", not "revocated".[/quote]

http://www.howard.edu/policy/academic/d ... cation.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

wow.......just wow.........

Mal Reynolds · Post by **Mal Reynolds** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:32 am

Philosopher King? Is that you?

SilverE2 · Post by **SilverE2** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:37 am

chiro wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?

Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.
Can someone translate for me?

Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?[/quote]

No, it's your faulty reasoning that I can't understand. Btw--it's "REVOKED", not "revocated".[/quote]

http://www.howard.edu/policy/academic/d ... cation.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

wow.......just wow.........[/quote]

Holy shit, you seriously can't be this stupid.

Revoke is a verb. Revocation is a noun. You don't take a noun and add an -ed to turn it into the past tense of a verb. What the fuck is wrong with you.

Was Doctor king a dueshbag? Forum

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Register for access!