flyingpanda wrote:Brown.vanwinkle wrote:If (Mitchell) Then (Win)flyingpanda wrote:Taking evidence as a 1L? Mistake or win?
Else (No)
End If
My buddy has him for crim law and loves him. I do not know how he is as an Evidence professor...
flyingpanda wrote:Brown.vanwinkle wrote:If (Mitchell) Then (Win)flyingpanda wrote:Taking evidence as a 1L? Mistake or win?
Else (No)
End If
I'm just wondering more about evidence as to the actual class. Is it a hard class to understand? Seems very rules heavy.Doritos wrote:flyingpanda wrote:Brown.vanwinkle wrote:If (Mitchell) Then (Win)flyingpanda wrote:Taking evidence as a 1L? Mistake or win?
Else (No)
End If
My buddy has him for crim law and loves him. I do not know how he is as an Evidence professor...
It is extremely rules-heavy and dense. That "drinking from a fire hose" feeling is on full time in that class. I think it's a class that's straightforward, in that the classes (and the E&E by Arthur Best) can easily make clear what the rules are and how you should use them on an exam, but there's a lot of those rules to learn.flyingpanda wrote:I'm just wondering more about evidence as to the actual class. Is it a hard class to understand? Seems very rules heavy.
Oh god! Why didn't I get PRvanwinkle wrote:It is extremely rules-heavy and dense. That "drinking from a fire hose" feeling is on full time in that class. I think it's a class that's straightforward, in that the classes (and the E&E by Arthur Best) can easily make clear what the rules are and how you should use them on an exam, but there's a lot of those rules to learn.flyingpanda wrote:I'm just wondering more about evidence as to the actual class. Is it a hard class to understand? Seems very rules heavy.
Also because you're having to cover so much material you really want to make sure you take it with a good professor. Mitchell is entertaining and engaging and kept the class moving quickly all semester long. Either that or you'd better be really damn good at self-studying.
Depending on who's PR you take, PR is very easily one of the more challenging, yet boring, classes in law school.flyingpanda wrote:Oh god! Why didn't I get PRvanwinkle wrote:It is extremely rules-heavy and dense. That "drinking from a fire hose" feeling is on full time in that class. I think it's a class that's straightforward, in that the classes (and the E&E by Arthur Best) can easily make clear what the rules are and how you should use them on an exam, but there's a lot of those rules to learn.flyingpanda wrote:I'm just wondering more about evidence as to the actual class. Is it a hard class to understand? Seems very rules heavy.
Also because you're having to cover so much material you really want to make sure you take it with a good professor. Mitchell is entertaining and engaging and kept the class moving quickly all semester long. Either that or you'd better be really damn good at self-studying.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Really? I keep hearing how easy it is.vamedic03 wrote:one of the more challenging
Might be late for this, but for next fall I guess, would you recommend Yale or Yin?YCrevolution wrote:RVP11 wrote:Really? I keep hearing how easy it is.vamedic03 wrote:one of the more challenging
I'd say Evidence is one of the most challenging courses a 1L can take. But also one of the most interesting and useful. If it were up to me I'd make Evidence andCorporationsFederal Income Tax required 1L courses instead of allowing electives.
Nah, I'd say Legislation with Nelson is the most challenging course a 1L can take followed by Evidence. Having taken both Spring semester 1L, I'd recommend against it. Then again, I think Legislation should be a required course.RVP11 wrote:Really? I keep hearing how easy it is.vamedic03 wrote:one of the more challenging
I'd say Evidence is one of the most challenging courses a 1L can take. But also one of the most interesting and useful. If it were up to me I'd make Evidence and Corporations required 1L courses instead of allowing electives.
DO NOT TAKE KITCH. He has consistently the worst reviews of any professor at UVA law. DO NOT TAKE KITCH. For Corporations - wait and take it with either Kordana, Geis, or Barzura.BruceWayne wrote:What's wrong with this Kitch guy (teaches corporations)????
Speaking of which, where can we see professor reviews?vamedic03 wrote:DO NOT TAKE KITCH. He has consistently the worst reviews of any professor at UVA law. DO NOT TAKE KITCH. For Corporations - wait and take it with either Kordana, Geis, or Barzura.BruceWayne wrote:What's wrong with this Kitch guy (teaches corporations)????
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
lawweb -> completed course evaluations ->bgdddymtty wrote:Speaking of which, where can we see professor reviews?vamedic03 wrote:DO NOT TAKE KITCH. He has consistently the worst reviews of any professor at UVA law. DO NOT TAKE KITCH. For Corporations - wait and take it with either Kordana, Geis, or Barzura.BruceWayne wrote:What's wrong with this Kitch guy (teaches corporations)????
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
--LinkRemoved--plenipotentiary wrote:I'm piling on, but are there any apartment complexes within walking distance of the law school that have wood floors? I'm not super picky about amenities in general, but I have a dust allergy and I think carpet is really gross.
Arlington Park (operated by Woodard Properties) is about a block farther from the law school than the Jeffersonian. They all have hardwood floors, but they're all larger 2-bedroom townhomes.plenipotentiary wrote:I'm piling on, but are there any apartment complexes within walking distance of the law school that have wood floors? I'm not super picky about amenities in general, but I have a dust allergy and I think carpet is really gross.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
From the conversations I've had with people in real life here (not on TLS) it seems like you will be fine. You have 3+ years of consulting WE, that is a big boost come job search time. The thing about UVA is that it seems like everyone get's a job, the question is if that job is exactly what they want or not.t-ender wrote:I was just accepted to UVA but now I'm starting to have second thoughts about law school altogether. For a long time, my goal was to go to law school and UVA was always my first choice. I studied hard for the LSAT and actually enjoyed it once I got the hang of the test (I ended up a score above UVA's 75% range). I also did a good amount of volunteer work at local law firms and liked the cases and the paralegals / lawyers I worked with.
My major concern with going to law school is not being able to find a good job upon graduation. I've heard horror stories from friends at other schools (T-25 through T-75) not getting jobs and graduating with 150k+ debt and their experiences have started to mess with my head. I hope to work for a well regarded law firm but I am not really picky about the location (does not have to be NYC, DC, Chicago, etc). I know that doing well at UVA will position me well for biglaw jobs but there is no guarantee I will be in the top 30% or even 50%. I have 3+ years working experience in consulting and would treat law school like a full-time job but I'm still worried about not making the grade.
I will be visiting the school on Friday and was wondering if any of the current 1L or 2L students available to meet for a cup of coffee and discuss their experiences for a few minutes?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login