Lol, I'm thinking so. Don't worry, you can always start slowly with a 6-inch inseam before working your way down to a brospectable 3-inch inseam.lawschool22 wrote:So yes? lolSplitMyPants wrote:It's a thing on any campus that has a large presence of southern fraternity culture.lawschool22 wrote:Are these a thing at Duke as well?
TLS Class of 2017 Forum
-
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
- critical mass
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:04 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
thanks nonconsecutive!Nonconsecutive wrote:Congrats!critical mass wrote:NYU bound.
- Nonconsecutive
- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Mah gawd.SplitMyPants wrote:Lol, I'm thinking so. Don't worry, you can always start slowly with a 6-inch inseam before working your way down to a brospectable 3-inch inseam.lawschool22 wrote:So yes? lolSplitMyPants wrote:It's a thing on any campus that has a large presence of southern fraternity culture.lawschool22 wrote:Are these a thing at Duke as well?

- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I think I might just be a trendsetter and stick to the 9" inseam.SplitMyPants wrote:Lol, I'm thinking so. Don't worry, you can always start slowly with a 6-inch inseam before working your way down to a brospectable 3-inch inseam.lawschool22 wrote:So yes? lolSplitMyPants wrote:It's a thing on any campus that has a large presence of southern fraternity culture.lawschool22 wrote:Are these a thing at Duke as well?

-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.lawschool22 wrote:I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DCNTUA
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:19 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
daryldixon wrote:You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.lawschool22 wrote:I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.

-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.DCNTUA wrote:daryldixon wrote:You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.lawschool22 wrote:I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Yeah, that would have been horrific if you had let it go.daryldixon wrote: I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.

- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Man, someone should tell Rad Lulz he sucked at law school, and obviously law practice by extension.daryldixon wrote: I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
That last part is kind of dumb imho.daryldixon wrote:You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.lawschool22 wrote:I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.
- georgej
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:55 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Not to knock anyone taking out mad debt because I probably would have too if the cycle had turned out differently, but knowing that you'll come out on the other side with not much debt is a really nice feeling.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I'm all for minimization of debt, I just think simplistic notions of "never take out more that $X" fail to consider all the various factors unique to a person's own situation.georgej wrote:Not to knock anyone taking out mad debt because I probably would have too if the cycle had turned out differently, but knowing that you'll come out on the other side with not much debt is a really nice feeling.
- 7ofNine
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:51 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I think it is really hard to pick a number at which point debt doesn't make sense. Everyone's situations are so different that the number will be different for everyone. I think minimizing debt as much as possible always makes sense but that might look very different for different people.
ETA: scooped by ls22
ETA: scooped by ls22
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.
- moopness
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I really like EquallyWrong's posts. I award you all the internets!EquallyWrong wrote:Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.
Edit: AND you're going to Columbia too! Fuck yeaaa
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- midwest17
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
You mean "spelling"daryldixon wrote:I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.DCNTUA wrote:daryldixon wrote:You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.lawschool22 wrote: I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
But there is an inherent flaw in not using a number to describe an unacceptable amount of debt. Without a number (or limit) human beings tend to rationalize their economically irrational choices based off of a comparison fallacy. If you get into three law schools that will require you to take out 200k in loans and one that will only require you to take out 150k, the 150k school looks cheap. Indeed most pre-law students rationalize their choice to go to law school and decide that 150k is "cheap". The problem is that 150k of debt is not cheap. Yes it is cheaper than 200k but it is very expensive and will require years of hard work and sacrifice to pay back.EquallyWrong wrote:Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.
So no I am not just saying "minimize debt". I am saying that you are making the wrong decision if you are going to a law school that will require you to take out more than 100k of loans. Arguing over my limit doesn't change my advice. Everyone should pick a limit and my advice (based on my own experience with law school and debt) is to use 100k as an outside limit.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Perfect, you have made your point. If you would like to engage in further discussion regarding arbitrary levels of acceptable debt, please make your own thread.daryldixon wrote:But there is an inherent flaw in not using a number to describe an unacceptable amount of debt. Without a number (or limit) human beings tend to rationalize their economically irrational choices based off of a comparison fallacy. If you get into three law schools that will require you to take out 200k in loans and one that will only require you to take out 150k, the 150k school looks cheap. Indeed most pre-law students rationalize their choice to go to law school and decide that 150k is "cheap". The problem is that 150k of debt is not cheap. Yes it is cheaper than 200k but it is very expensive and will require years of hard work and sacrifice to pay back.EquallyWrong wrote:Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.
So no I am not just saying "minimize debt". I am saying that you are making the wrong decision if you are going to a law school that will require you to take out more than 100k of loans. Arguing over my limit doesn't change my advice. Everyone should pick a limit and my advice (based on my own experience with law school and debt) is to use 100k as an outside limit.
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Oh no, years of hard work!
I was never signing up for that.
I was never signing up for that.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RCO2012
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I've missed you BoM. This made me chuckle.barrelofmonkeys wrote:Oh no, years of hard work!
I was never signing up for that.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:14 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
barrelofmonkeys wrote:Oh no, years of hard work!
I was never signing up for that.




- cricketlove00
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:59 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
This thread went from great awesome fun stuff to like math and shit.
- thechancellor
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
You'll fit right in with that name.yost wrote:Most likely Ann Arbor bound. Though I am riding a few wait lists.
I'm pretty sure I've said something to you about it before but it bears repeating.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login