TLS Class of 2017 Forum

(housing, friendships, future exams, all things 2017)
Post Reply

Demographics

Married/Engaged - Local
41
18%
Married/Engaged - Long Distance
16
7%
Super Serial Relationship - Local
38
16%
Super Serial LDR
29
13%
Casual Relationship - Local
7
3%
Casual LDR
5
2%
Single and Slooty
22
10%
Single and Looking to Mingle/Date
39
17%
Single and Awkward AF
23
10%
Single and FA
11
5%
 
Total votes: 231

SplitMyPants

Gold
Posts: 1673
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by SplitMyPants » Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:07 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
SplitMyPants wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:Are these a thing at Duke as well?
It's a thing on any campus that has a large presence of southern fraternity culture.
So yes? lol
Lol, I'm thinking so. Don't worry, you can always start slowly with a 6-inch inseam before working your way down to a brospectable 3-inch inseam.

User avatar
critical mass

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:04 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by critical mass » Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:07 pm

Nonconsecutive wrote:
critical mass wrote:NYU bound.
Congrats!
thanks nonconsecutive!

User avatar
Nonconsecutive

Gold
Posts: 2398
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by Nonconsecutive » Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:11 pm

SplitMyPants wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
SplitMyPants wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:Are these a thing at Duke as well?
It's a thing on any campus that has a large presence of southern fraternity culture.
So yes? lol
Lol, I'm thinking so. Don't worry, you can always start slowly with a 6-inch inseam before working your way down to a brospectable 3-inch inseam.
Mah gawd. :lol:

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by lawschool22 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:12 pm

SplitMyPants wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
SplitMyPants wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:Are these a thing at Duke as well?
It's a thing on any campus that has a large presence of southern fraternity culture.
So yes? lol
Lol, I'm thinking so. Don't worry, you can always start slowly with a 6-inch inseam before working your way down to a brospectable 3-inch inseam.
I think I might just be a trendsetter and stick to the 9" inseam. :lol:

daryldixon

Bronze
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by daryldixon » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:14 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.
I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.
You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
DCNTUA

Bronze
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:19 am

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by DCNTUA » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:16 pm

daryldixon wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.
I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.
You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.
:|

daryldixon

Bronze
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by daryldixon » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:23 pm

DCNTUA wrote:
daryldixon wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.
I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.
You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.
:|
I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by lawschool22 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:33 pm

daryldixon wrote: I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.
Yeah, that would have been horrific if you had let it go. :lol:

User avatar
Ricky-Bobby

Silver
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by Ricky-Bobby » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:40 pm

daryldixon wrote: I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.
Man, someone should tell Rad Lulz he sucked at law school, and obviously law practice by extension.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by lawschool22 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:48 pm

daryldixon wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
daryldixon wrote:Everyone in here should consider not going to law school unless they have a scholarship or savings that will make their total debt less than 100k upon graduation. Trust me. I wish someone had said that to me 3 years ago. And I am one of the lucky ones. I won the big law lottery. But seriously fuck debt servitude. It doesn't seem real to you now but you will kick yourself later if you take more than 100k of debt on.
I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.
You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.
That last part is kind of dumb imho.

User avatar
georgej

Gold
Posts: 3109
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:55 am

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by georgej » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:52 pm

Not to knock anyone taking out mad debt because I probably would have too if the cycle had turned out differently, but knowing that you'll come out on the other side with not much debt is a really nice feeling.

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by lawschool22 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:53 pm

georgej wrote:Not to knock anyone taking out mad debt because I probably would have too if the cycle had turned out differently, but knowing that you'll come out on the other side with not much debt is a really nice feeling.
I'm all for minimization of debt, I just think simplistic notions of "never take out more that $X" fail to consider all the various factors unique to a person's own situation.

User avatar
7ofNine

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:51 am

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by 7ofNine » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:55 pm

I think it is really hard to pick a number at which point debt doesn't make sense. Everyone's situations are so different that the number will be different for everyone. I think minimizing debt as much as possible always makes sense but that might look very different for different people.

ETA: scooped by ls22

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
georgej

Gold
Posts: 3109
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:55 am

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by georgej » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:56 pm

Yeah, exactly.

EquallyWrong

Gold
Posts: 4475
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by EquallyWrong » Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:41 pm

Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.

Chriz

Bronze
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by Chriz » Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:42 pm

Im going to Wiscansin.

User avatar
moopness

Bronze
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by moopness » Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:46 pm

EquallyWrong wrote:Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.
I really like EquallyWrong's posts. I award you all the internets!

Edit: AND you're going to Columbia too! Fuck yeaaa

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
midwest17

Gold
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by midwest17 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:42 pm

daryldixon wrote:
DCNTUA wrote:
daryldixon wrote:
lawschool22 wrote: I agree with you generally about keeping debt as low as possible, assuming you can still reach your goals with that choice. But $100k is an arbitray threshold.
You mean "arbitrary" but you are right. Honestly, the number should be much lower than that. 100k is just the very max I would ever think could be plausible.
:|
I didn't want to make the post only about grammar but I did want to correct the error. Sorry, law school teaches you to never let typos go.
You mean "spelling"

daryldixon

Bronze
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by daryldixon » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:58 pm

EquallyWrong wrote:Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.
But there is an inherent flaw in not using a number to describe an unacceptable amount of debt. Without a number (or limit) human beings tend to rationalize their economically irrational choices based off of a comparison fallacy. If you get into three law schools that will require you to take out 200k in loans and one that will only require you to take out 150k, the 150k school looks cheap. Indeed most pre-law students rationalize their choice to go to law school and decide that 150k is "cheap". The problem is that 150k of debt is not cheap. Yes it is cheaper than 200k but it is very expensive and will require years of hard work and sacrifice to pay back.

So no I am not just saying "minimize debt". I am saying that you are making the wrong decision if you are going to a law school that will require you to take out more than 100k of loans. Arguing over my limit doesn't change my advice. Everyone should pick a limit and my advice (based on my own experience with law school and debt) is to use 100k as an outside limit.

User avatar
chuckbass

Platinum
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by chuckbass » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:14 pm

daryldixon wrote:
EquallyWrong wrote:Minimizing debt is a good and obvious rule of thumb, as good and obvious as minimizing the number of times you get major surgeries done.... I think it worth pointing out that debt in excess of 100k will not force a tear in the space time continuum and bring the universe whimpering to an end...it means working brutal hours without the ability to buy nice things and, maybe, confronting the futility of human existence in an up close and intimate way.
But there is an inherent flaw in not using a number to describe an unacceptable amount of debt. Without a number (or limit) human beings tend to rationalize their economically irrational choices based off of a comparison fallacy. If you get into three law schools that will require you to take out 200k in loans and one that will only require you to take out 150k, the 150k school looks cheap. Indeed most pre-law students rationalize their choice to go to law school and decide that 150k is "cheap". The problem is that 150k of debt is not cheap. Yes it is cheaper than 200k but it is very expensive and will require years of hard work and sacrifice to pay back.

So no I am not just saying "minimize debt". I am saying that you are making the wrong decision if you are going to a law school that will require you to take out more than 100k of loans. Arguing over my limit doesn't change my advice. Everyone should pick a limit and my advice (based on my own experience with law school and debt) is to use 100k as an outside limit.
Perfect, you have made your point. If you would like to engage in further discussion regarding arbitrary levels of acceptable debt, please make your own thread.

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys

Gold
Posts: 1942
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by barrelofmonkeys » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:21 pm

Oh no, years of hard work!

I was never signing up for that.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
RCO2012

Silver
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:38 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by RCO2012 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:25 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:Oh no, years of hard work!

I was never signing up for that.
I've missed you BoM. This made me chuckle.

mydasmarie

Bronze
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:14 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by mydasmarie » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:28 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:Oh no, years of hard work!

I was never signing up for that.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
cricketlove00

Silver
Posts: 1271
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:59 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by cricketlove00 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:30 pm

This thread went from great awesome fun stuff to like math and shit.

User avatar
thechancellor

Silver
Posts: 584
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: TLS Class of 2017

Post by thechancellor » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:34 pm

yost wrote:Most likely Ann Arbor bound. Though I am riding a few wait lists.
You'll fit right in with that name.

I'm pretty sure I've said something to you about it before but it bears repeating.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “TLS Class of 2017 Forum”