TLS Class of 2017 Forum

Attax · Post by **Attax** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:46 pm

Thank you for the nomination. I feel honored!

DCNTUA · Post by **DCNTUA** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:48 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:I'm already Headmaster, so idk what you all are going on about right now.

Scotty is our ~Dumbledore~

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:49 pm

Post removed.

lastsamurai · Post by **lastsamurai** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:50 pm

DCNTUA wrote:
Cal Trask wrote:
DCNTUA wrote:I motion for the following to be considered for various positions (listed alphabetically):

Attax
BarrelofMonkeys
Koala
LastSamurai
LawSchool22
Midwest
Nep
Ohpobrecito (RIP)
Philly
PourMeTea
Scoobers
Scotty
WTRC
Some blatant nepotism up in here, I'll tell you what.

Ugh here I am excited to meet a new future classmate then it turns out you were just an old future classmate. Thanks 4 the nom though

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:50 pm

DCNTUA wrote:
Cal Trask wrote:
DCNTUA wrote:I motion for the following to be considered for various positions (listed alphabetically):

Attax
BarrelofMonkeys
Koala
LastSamurai
LawSchool22
Midwest
Nep
Ohpobrecito (RIP)
Philly
PourMeTea
Scoobers
Scotty
WTRC
Some blatant nepotism up in here, I'll tell you what.

actually I might not be a 2017 citizen so ineligible to run for anything.

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:51 pm

DCNTUA wrote:I motion for the following to be considered for various positions (listed alphabetically):

Attax
BarrelofMonkeys
Koala
LastSamurai
LawSchool22
Midwest
Nep
Ohpobrecito (RIP)
Philly
PourMeTea
Scoobers
Scotty
WTRC

seconded

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:51 pm

PourMeTea wrote:
neprep wrote:I definitely don't support lowering the gold standard. It's a slippery slope towards lowering all standards. Terrible way to begin law school.
The gold standard will NOT be lowered because a) I slaved over the image and b) 2k I'd hardly prestigious besides

(tactically sidesteps my proposal to be queen)
(seeks prestige)

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:51 pm

I'm devising a way that you guys can get nominated. It may involve PWing.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:53 pm

Post removed.

Cal Trask · Post by **Cal Trask** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:53 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:I'm devising a way that you guys can get nominated. It may involve PWing.

If you're involved it'll almost certainly involve PWing.

lastsamurai · Post by **lastsamurai** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:53 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:I'm devising a way that you guys can get nominated. It may involve PWing.

^instantly lounged

Cal Trask · Post by **Cal Trask** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:53 pm

PourMeTea wrote:Elections are a terrible idea.

I agree, a violent usurpation is really what we need.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:53 pm

Post removed.

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:54 pm

Cal Trask wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:I'm devising a way that you guys can get nominated. It may involve PWing.
If you're involved it'll almost certainly involve PWing.

<3 You would win immediately if you PWed.

jk148706 · Post by **jk148706** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:55 pm

PourMeTea wrote:Elections are a terrible idea.

I can be bought for support

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:56 pm

PWing is a great idea if we want lounged.

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:56 pm

lawschool22 wrote:PWing is a great idea if we want lounged.

Ok yeah, no lounge yet.

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:56 pm

so basically what Tea is saying is that you can go ahead and perfunctorily go through the motions of an election but it doesn't matter because monarchs are in the house.

jk148706 · Post by **jk148706** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:56 pm

lawschool22 wrote:PWing is a great idea if we want lounged.

U r a great leader.

My initial support is for ls22 but I can be persuaded

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:57 pm

Post removed.

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:57 pm

neprep wrote:so basically what Tea is saying is that you can go ahead and perfunctorily go through the motions of an election but it doesn't matter because monarchs are in the house.

I mean if you want to basically be figureheads a la British monarchy that's fine. But we both know monarchies are going to fail itg.

jk148706 · Post by **jk148706** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:58 pm

PourMeTea wrote:
jk148706 wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:Elections are a terrible idea.
I can be bought for support
I hope you like giant pencils with my moniker inscribed bc I have one c/o a rogue February taker

Actually I have a picture is all

No thanks I'm looking for a 1.2 gallon ziplock to screw lsac when I take my lsat

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:58 pm

Post removed.

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:59 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
neprep wrote:so basically what Tea is saying is that you can go ahead and perfunctorily go through the motions of an election but it doesn't matter because monarchs are in the house.
I mean if you want to basically be figureheads a la British monarchy that's fine. But we both know monarchies are going to fail itg.

DCNTUA · Post by **DCNTUA** » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:59 pm

I want to be the Benjamin Franklin of this group.