Fiero85 wrote:...and that's why I'm glad I'm not OP or "Headmaster"scottidsntknow wrote:Fiero, you can make the index, you're a smart guy!Fiero85 wrote:Percent of Classwith Azzburgers and/or with too much time on their handson TLS Index coming soon. Ticker symbol TLSP.
The People demand it, Scott.![]()
Ridiculous Demands > Accountability
TLS Class of 2017 Forum
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
People's Demand #2:
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent
Good luck Scott!
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent
Good luck Scott!
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
It's either that or Duke's class size is about to double.jingosaur wrote:I'm assuming that one person who got into Duke has 12 alts.
- sjgonzalez3

- Posts: 147
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:10 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I'd also say, considering Harvard's selectivity, they are crushing it. Or I guess it just speaks volumes about the population on TLS. Very top-heavy.ZGr88n wrote:Considering Duke’s relatively small class size, they are crushing it.scottidsntknow wrote:Congrats everyone!
And for those keeping track, it looks like Harvard and Duke have separated themselves from the rest of the pack so far, with 13 and 12 respectively.
- meb1212

- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
uh - ohFiero85 wrote:People's Demand #2:
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent![]()
Good luck Scott!
- lastsamurai

- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Maybe Duke is recruiting solely from TLS...
- jingosaur

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Yeah, HLS and Duke have close numbers, but HLS has way more frequent posters.Fiero85 wrote:People's Demand #2:
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent![]()
Good luck Scott!
Maybe we should do this by total number of posts by committed students with a cap of 5000.
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
A wild meb appearsmeb1212 wrote:uh - ohFiero85 wrote:People's Demand #2:
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent![]()
Good luck Scott!
I didn't realize your lurker status. Impressive in a way.
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Ah, the Blabbermouth Index...Ticker symbol: BLABjingosaur wrote:Yeah, HLS and Duke have close numbers, but HLS has way more frequent posters.Fiero85 wrote:People's Demand #2:
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent![]()
Good luck Scott!
Maybe we should do this by total number of posts by committed students with a cap of 5000.
Again, get on this Scott!
- meb1212

- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Fiero85 wrote:A wild meb appearsmeb1212 wrote:uh - ohFiero85 wrote:People's Demand #2:
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent![]()
Good luck Scott!![]()
I didn't realize your lurker status. Impressive in a way.
it's quality - not quantity right? That and I am way too slow at the interneting
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Apparently on TLS and in LS, there a scenarios where word vomit is the name of the game.meb1212 wrote:Fiero85 wrote:A wild meb appearsmeb1212 wrote:uh - ohFiero85 wrote:People's Demand #2:
We also demand a Lurker Index. Percentage of users per school with <100 posts up in here. Ticker symbol: LURK.
Should be pretty easy to put together, because lurkers are so cooperative and transparent![]()
Good luck Scott!![]()
I didn't realize your lurker status. Impressive in a way.
it's quality - not quantity right? That and I am way too slow at the interneting
But yes I agree, 50k poasts or whatever does not imply quality TLSing. I'm well under 1000 you know
Last edited by Fiero85 on Wed Apr 23, 2014 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Either a main cast member needs to mysteriously disappear, get hitched, or reveal a hidden murderous personality STAT unless we want this thread's ratings to plummet. Alternatively, Scotté: please create a controversial poll.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
^Love.neprep wrote:Either a main cast member needs to mysteriously disappear, get hitched, or reveal a hidden murderous personality STAT unless we want this thread's ratings to plummet. Alternatively, Scotté: please create a controversial poll.
Also sure, pm me ideas
- John Everyman

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:20 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Damn, lookit how ridiculously successful the class of 2013 thread was at bringing lurkers out of the woodwork. Even got Canadian law schools in there.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 25&t=83123
Terrible formatting though.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 25&t=83123
Terrible formatting though.
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Oh I have no ideas and I'm def not on the creative side of this venture. I've self appointed myself to Chief Curmudgeon/Complainer instead.scottidsntknow wrote:^Love.neprep wrote:Either a main cast member needs to mysteriously disappear, get hitched, or reveal a hidden murderous personality STAT unless we want this thread's ratings to plummet. Alternatively, Scotté: please create a controversial poll.
Also sure, pm me ideas
P.S. Taking poll suggestions from the rank and file usually ends pretty well.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Yet we already have twice as many postsJohn Everyman wrote:Damn, lookit how ridiculously successful the class of 2013 thread was at bringing lurkers out of the woodwork. Even got Canadian law schools in there.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 25&t=83123
Terrible formatting though.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Attention Class of 2017:
Please contribute.neprep wrote:Taking poll suggestions from the rank and file
- John Everyman

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:20 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Yeah that one got me a little, must have been an intense amount of pming for someone.scottidsntknow wrote:Yet we already have twice as many postsJohn Everyman wrote:Damn, lookit how ridiculously successful the class of 2013 thread was at bringing lurkers out of the woodwork. Even got Canadian law schools in there.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 25&t=83123
Terrible formatting though.
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
More like an intense amount of shitposting here
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Friends, Romans, Lurkers:
Please contribute poll ideas.
One thing I'm pretty interested in knowing is the career goal breakup ITT: PI / BigLaw / Govt / Academia / Other. Or, on a gloomy note, how about your projected debt at repayment?
Please contribute poll ideas.
One thing I'm pretty interested in knowing is the career goal breakup ITT: PI / BigLaw / Govt / Academia / Other. Or, on a gloomy note, how about your projected debt at repayment?
- ZGr88n

- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:00 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
This.neprep wrote:Friends, Romans, Lurkers:
Please contribute poll ideas.
One thing I'm pretty interested in knowing is the career goal breakup ITT: PI / BigLaw / Govt / Academia / Other. Or, on a gloomy note, how about your projected debt at repayment?
- John Everyman

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:20 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Not very controversial, but I can dig it. I'd rather see projected debt of those two, nice to compare to an average of this group.ZGr88n wrote:This.neprep wrote:Friends, Romans, Lurkers:
Please contribute poll ideas.
One thing I'm pretty interested in knowing is the career goal breakup ITT: PI / BigLaw / Govt / Academia / Other. Or, on a gloomy note, how about your projected debt at repayment?
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
I mean, we could do Triscuits v Wheat Thins.John Everyman wrote:
Not very controversial, but I can dig it. I'd rather see projected debt of those two, nice to compare to an average of this group.
- John Everyman

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:20 pm
Re: TLS Class of 2017
Whaho, don't go there man, we all know it's wheat thins hands down.neprep wrote:I mean, we could do Triscuits v Wheat Thins.John Everyman wrote:
Not very controversial, but I can dig it. I'd rather see projected debt of those two, nice to compare to an average of this group.
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: TLS Class of 2017
John Everyman wrote:Whaho, don't go there man, we all know it's wheat thins hands down.neprep wrote:I mean, we could do Triscuits v Wheat Thins.John Everyman wrote:
Not very controversial, but I can dig it. I'd rather see projected debt of those two, nice to compare to an average of this group.