Applying to nominated judges Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2020 3:14 am
Applying to nominated judges
Does anyone have a successful sample email you used to reach out to people nominated to the bench to let them know you want to apply to work in their chambers if/when confirmed?
-
- Posts: 431099
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Applying to nominated judges
Is it worth only applying to judges who have received hearings or are they all expected to be confirmed (outside of the California judges who never received blue slips)?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2020 7:57 pm
Re: Applying to nominated judges
Difficult to say. Obviously, I don't think there's much downside to expressing interest in a judge who might not be confirmed, especially if they are nominated for a district you're interested in. But it's true that there are only 5 more weeks that the Senate will be in session before the election and then just 5 more weeks of floor time in the lame duck session. The Senate hasn't been able to move through district court court nominees very quickly since coronavirus hit.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:05 amIs it worth only applying to judges who have received hearings or are they all expected to be confirmed (outside of the California judges who never received blue slips)?
It's possible that McConnell could confirm a bunch during the lame duck session (especially with the debate time for district court noms now shortened to 2 hours), but that would require him not losing 4 votes total from a) moderates like Murkowski, b) traditionalists like Grassley, and c) endangered incumbents up in 2022 like Toomey and Johnson.
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:38 am
Re: Applying to nominated judges
It still seems like he’s going to confirm a lot less controversial nominees that appear to have home support, especially if they’re not in a red state.ieveko wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:03 pmDifficult to say. Obviously, I don't think there's much downside to expressing interest in a judge who might not be confirmed, especially if they are nominated for a district you're interested in. But it's true that there are only 5 more weeks that the Senate will be in session before the election and then just 5 more weeks of floor time in the lame duck session. The Senate hasn't been able to move through district court court nominees very quickly since coronavirus hit.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:05 amIs it worth only applying to judges who have received hearings or are they all expected to be confirmed (outside of the California judges who never received blue slips)?
It's possible that McConnell could confirm a bunch during the lame duck session (especially with the debate time for district court noms now shortened to 2 hours), but that would require him not losing 4 votes total from a) moderates like Murkowski, b) traditionalists like Grassley, and c) endangered incumbents up in 2022 like Toomey and Johnson.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login