Future feeders? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Future feeders?
As some of the older feeder judges might retire at some point in the future, would anyone expect there to emerge a new crop of feeders among current judges or is it more likely that there will just be more feeding from the younger feeders.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Future feeders?
Any ideology you're looking for? If it's Griffith's retirement, then obviously all the "gunning" Trump conservative judges are probably in contention, and there's threads aplenty about who they are. That's in addition to Sutton, Katsas, Pryor, Thapar, Kethledge, etc. who are well-established.
For libs, I haven't heard of rumors about the Old Guard retiring quite yet, but again all the usual young names in addition to Sri are probably in contention. Maybe Watford and Friedland a little above the rest.
For libs, I haven't heard of rumors about the Old Guard retiring quite yet, but again all the usual young names in addition to Sri are probably in contention. Maybe Watford and Friedland a little above the rest.
