SCOTUS Shortlist

(Seek and share information about clerkship applications, clerkship hiring timelines, and post-clerkship employment opportunities)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."

Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 5:48 pm

SCOTUS Shortlist

Post by unilateral_stare » Mon Jun 10, 2019 11:39 am

Is a clerkship with a judge who was on the SCOTUS shortlist generally considered more prestigious? If so, why? My understanding is that shortlisted judges are very well connected, but does that actually affect the prestige/competitiveness of the clerkship (especially in the eyes of future employers)? Finally, would a shortlisted non-feeder judge from a non-2/9/DC be harder to get/more prestigious than a non-feeder judge from 2/9/DC? Any other thoughts on shortlist judges are, obviously, welcome :).


Posts: 375
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:57 am

Re: SCOTUS Shortlist

Post by wwwcol » Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:52 pm

if they get confirmed to SCOTUS, yeah, it’s more preftigious


Posts: 2318
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: SCOTUS Shortlist

Post by nixy » Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:53 pm

Probably depends on who wrote the shortlist.

Yes, all the shortlisted judges are going to be well known/connected. But overall I think you’re parsing prestige/selectivity too finely. “Shortlisted” isn’t a particularly meaningful category in itself; it’s the qualities that got someone shortlisted that matter. (And all COA judges are competitive.)

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Judicial Clerkships”