GDC clerkship bonus below market? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
GDC clerkship bonus below market?
I'm hearing GDC does not pay the market $70k for two clerkships (i.e. district ct and COA). Is this true?
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
It was true until a few years ago. They now pay market ($70k for both).
—former LA/NYC/DC office (maybe it’s different for Dallas, Denver, etc?) GDC summer, current clerk
—former LA/NYC/DC office (maybe it’s different for Dallas, Denver, etc?) GDC summer, current clerk
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
I've heard that in the LA office they don't give a bump for two. I believe one or two is 50 or 60k.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
I'm not sure $70K for two clerkships is really the "market" standard. It's not like $180K for first-year associate salary or the $50K bonus for one federal clerkship. Some firms offer extra for two clerkships, some firms don't.Anonymous User wrote:I'm hearing GDC does not pay the market $70k for two clerkships (i.e. district ct and COA). Is this true?
What I've noticed some firms doing lately is offering an extra $20K (so $70K instead of $50K) for two clerkships, but then starting the associate as a second year instead of as a third year. Associate candidates accept this far too readily. The firm has to cough up an extra $20K in bonus but saves $45K in year-end compensation.
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
Former GDC summer here. Can confirm that GDC matches market bonuses for both 1 and 2 clerkships.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bruinfan10
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
a preftigous megafirm with a really high vault ranking tried that with me. declined the offer immediately after they spelled that out.rpupkin wrote:I'm not sure $70K for two clerkships is really the "market" standard. It's not like $180K for first-year associate salary or the $50K bonus for one federal clerkship. Some firms offer extra for two clerkships, some firms don't.Anonymous User wrote:I'm hearing GDC does not pay the market $70k for two clerkships (i.e. district ct and COA). Is this true?
What I've noticed some firms doing lately is offering an extra $20K (so $70K instead of $50K) for two clerkships, but then starting the associate as a second year instead of as a third year. Associate candidates accept this far too readily. The firm has to cough up an extra $20K in bonus but saves $45K in year-end compensation.
that said, i've been surprised that a number of firms are paying $70k for two clerkships without officially advertising that policy. I wonder if it may vary from candidate to candidate.
and yes, gdc used to cheap out on second year clerkship bonuses, but i believe they are now paying 70k more often. In general, more firms are paying 70k now than in just a few years past.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
Yeah. I just found out that my firm has been paying $70K for a couple of years now for two clerkships. This is consistent with both your points--(1) more firms are doing it, but (2) the firms aren't really talking about it.bruinfan10 wrote:a preftigous megafirm with a really high vault ranking tried that with me. declined the offer immediately after they spelled that out.rpupkin wrote:I'm not sure $70K for two clerkships is really the "market" standard. It's not like $180K for first-year associate salary or the $50K bonus for one federal clerkship. Some firms offer extra for two clerkships, some firms don't.Anonymous User wrote:I'm hearing GDC does not pay the market $70k for two clerkships (i.e. district ct and COA). Is this true?
What I've noticed some firms doing lately is offering an extra $20K (so $70K instead of $50K) for two clerkships, but then starting the associate as a second year instead of as a third year. Associate candidates accept this far too readily. The firm has to cough up an extra $20K in bonus but saves $45K in year-end compensation.
that said, i've been surprised that a number of firms are paying $70k for two clerkships without officially advertising that policy. I wonder if it may vary from candidate to candidate.
and yes, gdc used to cheap out on second year clerkship bonuses, but i believe they are now paying 70k more often. In general, more firms are paying 70k now than in just a few years past.
-
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:12 pm
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
Has anyone had any luck negotiating to 100k for D Ct./CoA?
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
Some firms with heavy patent-lit practices will pay Federal Circuit clerks a bit more, but I haven't heard of $100k for a non-SCOTUS clerk.FascinatedWanderer wrote:Has anyone had any luck negotiating to 100k for D Ct./CoA?
If you want to maximize your chances of an "above market" clerkship bonus, treat it like law school admissions and scholarships: apply to several firms and get multiple offers, and then go back and forth among the firms, trying to get firms to top each other. Some firms will negotiate in this manner up to a point.
Just speaking for myself, I don't have the personality for that type of approach. (I also think that going to the firm that pays the highest clerkship bonus is a terrible way to choose a law firm.) But if you really commit yourself to the goal of getting the highest bonus that you can, I bet you can squeeze an extra $10K or so out of someone.
-
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:12 pm
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
Thanks, this seems like solid advice. You think it would be best to try to snag an offer from Kellogg/Susman for the $175k/$125k and then see if any other firms will match? Or are those firms too sui generis to leverage other firms with?rpupkin wrote:Some firms with heavy patent-lit practices will pay Federal Circuit clerks a bit more, but I haven't heard of $100k for a non-SCOTUS clerk.FascinatedWanderer wrote:Has anyone had any luck negotiating to 100k for D Ct./CoA?
If you want to maximize your chances of an "above market" clerkship bonus, treat it like law school admissions and scholarships: apply to several firms and get multiple offers, and then go back and forth among the firms, trying to get firms to top each other. Some firms will negotiate in this manner up to a point.
Just speaking for myself, I don't have the personality for that type of approach. (I also think that going to the firm that pays the highest clerkship bonus is a terrible way to choose a law firm.) But if you really commit yourself to the goal of getting the highest bonus that you can, I bet you can squeeze an extra $10K or so out of someone.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: GDC clerkship bonus below market?
No one is going to match Kellogg or Susman. If you get offers at those places, you can certainly try to use them as a basis for asking for a higher bonus from a market-paying firm, but, if such a firm offers you anything extra, it'll probably be on the order of $5K or $10K, and not the $100K+ needed to match Kellogg.FascinatedWanderer wrote:Thanks, this seems like solid advice. You think it would be best to try to snag an offer from Kellogg/Susman for the $175k/$125k and then see if any other firms will match? Or are those firms too sui generis to leverage other firms with?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login