. Forum

(Seek and share information about clerkship applications, clerkship hiring timelines, and post-clerkship employment opportunities)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

.

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:45 pm

j)
Last edited by Anonymous User on Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Companion Cube

Silver
Posts: 815
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:21 pm

Re: D. Arizona.

Post by Companion Cube » Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:49 pm

Hard to say, because every firm has their own individual point of view on these things. But fwiw, a hiring partner at a biglaw firm I just spoke with said that the difference between a fed. clerkship with a judge in his region and one with a judge he's never heard of is vast. Yes, any federal clerkship is a gold star on your resume but that doesn't mean some people doing the hiring will not be particularly impressed. I would say that if you want to work in LA gun for a clerkship in California before committing to Arizona.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: D. Arizona.

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jul 31, 2015 5:37 pm

I would say that if you want to work in LA gun for a clerkship in California before committing to Arizona.
Thanks for the response. I would definitely do this but it is a sort of "if you are interested, apply now and get immediate consideration" sort of thing. I feel compelled to either apply by this coming Monday or not at all.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: D. Arizona.

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:02 pm

Anyone else have input here? Tomorrow is basically decision time for me. Thanks!

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: D. Arizona.

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 02, 2015 8:01 pm

Don't have a ton to offer but since no one else is, I'm clerking in the district with no current intent to stay. Know at least one person that went LA BIGLAW -> DAZ -> LA BIGLAW. Know people that did 9th cir in phx and went all over, obviously. I think we would all need to know a million other factors before being able to give informed advice. And even then it would be personal.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: D. Arizona.

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 02, 2015 8:07 pm

I don't have a lot to offer either - am sort of familiar with D. Az but don't know anything about the LA market. I will say that I think the idea that there is a "vast" difference between clerkships can vary a lot - I know people who clerked in more flyover-y-districts than Arizona who were going off to jobs all over the place, and have seen employers treat out-of-district clerkships/clerkships with judges they don't know with just as much respect as any other. I think a clerkship in your preferred market is definitely ideal, but I would rather have a clerkship in a different market than strike out on clerking. But that will also depend a great deal on what else you bring to the table, in terms of your credentials and current connections to LA and so on.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Judicial Clerkships”