Politics of Appellate decisions Forum

(Seek and share information about clerkship applications, clerkship hiring timelines, and post-clerkship employment opportunities)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Politics of Appellate decisions

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:05 am

Have a clerkship interview in a few hours, an would appreciate any advice I can get.

Can someone explain, broadly, the politics of appellate courts? (e.g., what's involved in en banc decisions, how to judges interact with other judges on panels, etc.)

hiima3L

Silver
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:26 pm

Re: Politics of Appellate decisions

Post by hiima3L » Fri Mar 07, 2014 12:26 pm

En banc cases are those that the court as a whole generally finds to be very important. They're often (I think almost only?) granted after a controversial/important opinion by a panel. I think a majority needs to grand for rehearing en banc. One panel cannot overrule another panel's decision, hence the need for en banc decisions.

I don't know what you're asking about the "politics." Because every judge is a human, the way he or she interacts with his or hear colleagues will vary.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Politics of Appellate decisions

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Fri Mar 07, 2014 12:56 pm

I also think these are perfectly good questions to ask in an interview, rather than bathing you're expected to know already.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Judicial Clerkships”