I know someone who clerked for her and he didn't really like his time there. But he is also kind of an incessant complainer so who knows.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:34 amBy reputation, McMahon is tough as nails, but a good judge.
Let's talk 2nd Circuit! Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Does anyone know if the SDNY/EDNY/DCT/2C judges with available OSCAR postings consider off-plan applications on a rolling basis as they are submitted? or do they mostly wait until June to review both 2L and 3L/grad applications? thanks for any info!
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Depends on the judge. Some are interviewing now; others are waiting until Plan Day.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Myrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Former CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Is Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
You'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Agreed. She is new, so this reputation may not have been as widely known or discussed previously and young lawyers tend to have the personalities to take some degree of punishment. It is Second Circuit so people might rather be abused than move to a flyover district. For what it's worth, I respected her clerks, but these reports of her behavior ring true. I also heard she could never keep an assistant and they don't all have great things to say.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu May 22, 2025 8:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Hopefully more widespread reporting of the extent of the mistreatment, versus just vaguely "avoid," will help.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Forgot to add in earlier comment that she made a clerk come in on xmas eve because she was mad at them.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2021 1:10 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
I am clerking for one of these judges and we're considering applications on a rolling basis, although unless we get a fantastic application we'll probably wait till the plan opens. (We'd also consider 2Ls as soon as they have four semesters of grades, even before the plan opens, if they email their applications to our chambers address. This might be a consideration for 2Ls who see 'email or apply through OSCAR' openings.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:17 pmDoes anyone know if the SDNY/EDNY/DCT/2C judges with available OSCAR postings consider off-plan applications on a rolling basis as they are submitted? or do they mostly wait until June to review both 2L and 3L/grad applications? thanks for any info!
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2021 1:10 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Agreed. There's a judge in our courthouse who has a reputation for being extremely difficult to work for and his clerks are just as well credentialed as everyone else. I think in some instances, the word doesn't spread so well (looking back at my judge list from when I was applying, there are judges I would've been happy to get an interview with who I now know would not have provided pleasant clerkship experiences) and in others, applicants decide that the career boosts of clerking/clerking for a big-name judge/clerking in a certain locale make having a difficult boss worthwhile.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Correct, but there are also just tons and tons of very-good-but-not-great resumes in the CA2 pile, and Perez has never been one of the judges who aims for tippy top students like Lohier or Park.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
[*]LawBurner1 wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 5:53 pmAgreed. There's a judge in our courthouse who has a reputation for being extremely difficult to work for and his clerks are just as well credentialed as everyone else. I think in some instances, the word doesn't spread so well (looking back at my judge list from when I was applying, there are judges I would've been happy to get an interview with who I now know would not have provided pleasant clerkship experiences) and in others, applicants decide that the career boosts of clerking/clerking for a big-name judge/clerking in a certain locale make having a difficult boss worthwhile.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
There is a literal red flag at some law schools about her (at my own and confirmed at my girlfriend’s). I’ve been explicitly advised not to even apply to her - so make it make sense…
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
It really isn't that complicated. These law students don't care. They are so obsessed with being able to say that they clerked on second circuit that they will do it. Part of it is these law schools too. They spend two years hammering into a student's brain that clerking is the goal, clerking is the goal, so of course these people apply to her. I remember talking to a Pan clerk who knew exactly what she was getting into but all she says is D.C. Circuit, D.C. Circuit.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 2:03 am[*]LawBurner1 wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 5:53 pmAgreed. There's a judge in our courthouse who has a reputation for being extremely difficult to work for and his clerks are just as well credentialed as everyone else. I think in some instances, the word doesn't spread so well (looking back at my judge list from when I was applying, there are judges I would've been happy to get an interview with who I now know would not have provided pleasant clerkship experiences) and in others, applicants decide that the career boosts of clerking/clerking for a big-name judge/clerking in a certain locale make having a difficult boss worthwhile.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
There is a literal red flag at some law schools about her (at my own and confirmed at my girlfriend’s). I’ve been explicitly advised not to even apply to her - so make it make sense…
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
1) The DC Circuit >>>> 2nd Circuit; 2) While Perez is fine, Pan’s career trajectory blows Perez’s out of the water and she’s already produced a couple of Bristows. Not saying the abuse is justified because her credentials are better or that the clerkship is “more” prestigious, but a Perez clerkship hardly seems worth the pain.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 9:48 pmIt really isn't that complicated. These law students don't care. They are so obsessed with being able to say that they clerked on second circuit that they will do it. Part of it is these law schools too. They spend two years hammering into a student's brain that clerking is the goal, clerking is the goal, so of course these people apply to her. I remember talking to a Pan clerk who knew exactly what she was getting into but all she says is D.C. Circuit, D.C. Circuit.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 2:03 am[*]LawBurner1 wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 5:53 pmAgreed. There's a judge in our courthouse who has a reputation for being extremely difficult to work for and his clerks are just as well credentialed as everyone else. I think in some instances, the word doesn't spread so well (looking back at my judge list from when I was applying, there are judges I would've been happy to get an interview with who I now know would not have provided pleasant clerkship experiences) and in others, applicants decide that the career boosts of clerking/clerking for a big-name judge/clerking in a certain locale make having a difficult boss worthwhile.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pm
Myrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
There is a literal red flag at some law schools about her (at my own and confirmed at my girlfriend’s). I’ve been explicitly advised not to even apply to her - so make it make sense…
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Pan has had 1 Bristow, and she had very little to do with it.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 12:52 am
1) The DC Circuit >>>> 2nd Circuit; 2) While Perez is fine, Pan’s career trajectory blows Perez’s out of the water and she’s already produced a couple of Bristows. Not saying the abuse is justified because her credentials are better or that the clerkship is “more” prestigious, but a Perez clerkship hardly seems worth the pain.
-
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Neither clerkship is worth the pain. But many law students don't have a sense of how much your life in chambers revolves around your judge and just how miserable a year can be if you have a bad boss.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 12:52 am1) The DC Circuit >>>> 2nd Circuit; 2) While Perez is fine, Pan’s career trajectory blows Perez’s out of the water and she’s already produced a couple of Bristows. Not saying the abuse is justified because her credentials are better or that the clerkship is “more” prestigious, but a Perez clerkship hardly seems worth the pain.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
See. Exhibit A. There will always be people who find a way to justify the abuse of judges or at least downplay it.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 12:52 am1) The DC Circuit >>>> 2nd Circuit; 2) While Perez is fine, Pan’s career trajectory blows Perez’s out of the water and she’s already produced a couple of Bristows. Not saying the abuse is justified because her credentials are better or that the clerkship is “more” prestigious, but a Perez clerkship hardly seems worth the pain.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 9:48 pmIt really isn't that complicated. These law students don't care. They are so obsessed with being able to say that they clerked on second circuit that they will do it. Part of it is these law schools too. They spend two years hammering into a student's brain that clerking is the goal, clerking is the goal, so of course these people apply to her. I remember talking to a Pan clerk who knew exactly what she was getting into but all she says is D.C. Circuit, D.C. Circuit.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 2:03 am[*]LawBurner1 wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 5:53 pmAgreed. There's a judge in our courthouse who has a reputation for being extremely difficult to work for and his clerks are just as well credentialed as everyone else. I think in some instances, the word doesn't spread so well (looking back at my judge list from when I was applying, there are judges I would've been happy to get an interview with who I now know would not have provided pleasant clerkship experiences) and in others, applicants decide that the career boosts of clerking/clerking for a big-name judge/clerking in a certain locale make having a difficult boss worthwhile.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.
There is a literal red flag at some law schools about her (at my own and confirmed at my girlfriend’s). I’ve been explicitly advised not to even apply to her - so make it make sense…
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Her assistant is hilarious though and does seem to know it’s not a normal chambers environment.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:35 pmAgreed. She is new, so this reputation may not have been as widely known or discussed previously and young lawyers tend to have the personalities to take some degree of punishment. It is Second Circuit so people might rather be abused than move to a flyover district. For what it's worth, I respected her clerks, but these reports of her behavior ring true. I also heard she could never keep an assistant and they don't all have great things to say.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 amIs Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:01 amFormer CA2 clerk. While Menashi is probably the judge the other judges like the least because he is an unprincipled troll, Perez seems like the worst experience for the clerks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed May 07, 2025 10:19 pmMyrna was well known as the worst bully at the Brennan Center. She had a talent for cruelty toward women especially. She would tear them down for sport to make herself feel better with her own insecurities. She likely had BPD and tried to control her team’s whole lives in an all encompassing, narcissistic, and violating way. Enough people on this thread have warned applicants she is abusive and exhausting. Stop applying to her.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Prestige or no prestige, it's fair to say that some people end up with an abusive judge because that's the only offer they have. Not saying they should take it, but people in that position for a variety of reasons pick that over starting back at 0 again.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat May 17, 2025 2:31 pmSee. Exhibit A. There will always be people who find a way to justify the abuse of judges or at least downplay it.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 12:52 am1) The DC Circuit >>>> 2nd Circuit; 2) While Perez is fine, Pan’s career trajectory blows Perez’s out of the water and she’s already produced a couple of Bristows. Not saying the abuse is justified because her credentials are better or that the clerkship is “more” prestigious, but a Perez clerkship hardly seems worth the pain.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 9:48 pmIt really isn't that complicated. These law students don't care. They are so obsessed with being able to say that they clerked on second circuit that they will do it. Part of it is these law schools too. They spend two years hammering into a student's brain that clerking is the goal, clerking is the goal, so of course these people apply to her. I remember talking to a Pan clerk who knew exactly what she was getting into but all she says is D.C. Circuit, D.C. Circuit.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 2:03 am[*]LawBurner1 wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 5:53 pmAgreed. There's a judge in our courthouse who has a reputation for being extremely difficult to work for and his clerks are just as well credentialed as everyone else. I think in some instances, the word doesn't spread so well (looking back at my judge list from when I was applying, there are judges I would've been happy to get an interview with who I now know would not have provided pleasant clerkship experiences) and in others, applicants decide that the career boosts of clerking/clerking for a big-name judge/clerking in a certain locale make having a difficult boss worthwhile.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:11 amYou'd be suprised.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 12:57 am
Is Perez then just accepting low-quality (or lower) applicants? I can’t imagine high-achieving law students/lawyers who would accept a clerkship at the risk of being fired and likely abused/overworked if they had the credentials to have other options.
There is a literal red flag at some law schools about her (at my own and confirmed at my girlfriend’s). I’ve been explicitly advised not to even apply to her - so make it make sense…
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat May 17, 2025 3:33 pmPrestige or no prestige, it's fair to say that some people end up with an abusive judge because that's the only offer they have. Not saying they should take it, but people in that position for a variety of reasons pick that over starting back at 0 again.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat May 17, 2025 2:31 pmSee. Exhibit A. There will always be people who find a way to justify the abuse of judges or at least downplay it.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 12:52 am1) The DC Circuit >>>> 2nd Circuit; 2) While Perez is fine, Pan’s career trajectory blows Perez’s out of the water and she’s already produced a couple of Bristows. Not saying the abuse is justified because her credentials are better or that the clerkship is “more” prestigious, but a Perez clerkship hardly seems worth the pain.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 9:48 pmIt really isn't that complicated. These law students don't care. They are so obsessed with being able to say that they clerked on second circuit that they will do it. Part of it is these law schools too. They spend two years hammering into a student's brain that clerking is the goal, clerking is the goal, so of course these people apply to her. I remember talking to a Pan clerk who knew exactly what she was getting into but all she says is D.C. Circuit, D.C. Circuit.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 2:03 am[*]LawBurner1 wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 5:53 pmAgreed. There's a judge in our courthouse who has a reputation for being extremely difficult to work for and his clerks are just as well credentialed as everyone else. I think in some instances, the word doesn't spread so well (looking back at my judge list from when I was applying, there are judges I would've been happy to get an interview with who I now know would not have provided pleasant clerkship experiences) and in others, applicants decide that the career boosts of clerking/clerking for a big-name judge/clerking in a certain locale make having a difficult boss worthwhile.
There is a literal red flag at some law schools about her (at my own and confirmed at my girlfriend’s). I’ve been explicitly advised not to even apply to her - so make it make sense…
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu May 22, 2025 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
No job or credential is worth your dignity.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!
Several SDNY judges have been interviewing 3Ls and alums now before the Plan opens
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login