Interesting, thanks. Rushing is very conservative, right? I've wondered before why she hasn't begun emerging as a feeder judge, given that she clerked for both CT and NMG. Maybe she just doesn't care about that or hasn't remained connected (or both). Any info on Richardson?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:23 pmFormer CA4 clerk. I've heard Rushing is kind and a good boss, but I've heard there's not a ton of day-to-day interaction with her clerks. Overall, supposed to be a positive clerkship experience thoughJefferson9921 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:06 pmThanks! Stras kind of seems like his legendary former boss, J. Michael Luttig, in the "not being everyone's cup of tea" regard. Not to pile on, but have you heard anything about what it's like to work for Rushing (CA4)?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:42 pmI have heard from a former Ho clerk that he is a good boss and that it was an enjoyable clerkship. That person is quite conservative, though, and I'm not sure he would be a good fit for a clerk of a different stripe.
I have heard quite negative things about Stras through the grapevine and from a professor who was on the faculty with him at Minnesota. I have also heard from someone who worked with him in private practice that he is a nice guy and was a good colleague. My guess is that he just isn't everyone's cup of tea.
Best and worst judges to clerk for Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2023 5:43 pm
Re: Best and worst judges to clerk for
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Best and worst judges to clerk for
Same former CA4 clerk. Yeah, she's arguably the most conservative judge on CA4.Jefferson9921 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:40 pmInteresting, thanks. Rushing is very conservative, right? I've wondered before why she hasn't begun emerging as a feeder judge, given that she clerked for both CT and NMG. Maybe she just doesn't care about that or hasn't remained connected (or both). Any info on Richardson?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:23 pmFormer CA4 clerk. I've heard Rushing is kind and a good boss, but I've heard there's not a ton of day-to-day interaction with her clerks. Overall, supposed to be a positive clerkship experience thoughJefferson9921 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:06 pmThanks! Stras kind of seems like his legendary former boss, J. Michael Luttig, in the "not being everyone's cup of tea" regard. Not to pile on, but have you heard anything about what it's like to work for Rushing (CA4)?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:42 pmI have heard from a former Ho clerk that he is a good boss and that it was an enjoyable clerkship. That person is quite conservative, though, and I'm not sure he would be a good fit for a clerk of a different stripe.
I have heard quite negative things about Stras through the grapevine and from a professor who was on the faculty with him at Minnesota. I have also heard from someone who worked with him in private practice that he is a nice guy and was a good colleague. My guess is that he just isn't everyone's cup of tea.
Richardson is great. Super friendly, and it's an intellectually rigorous clerkship. My understanding is that he hires quite early. Seems like his clerks generally start directly after law school.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Best and worst judges to clerk for
"Incoming 1L?" You shouldn't be worrying about clerking at all.Jefferson9921 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:06 pmAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:12 pmVery good to know. As an incoming 1L hoping (if I have the grades, of course) to clerk for someone like Richardson, should I expect to be applying as early as my first semester? Is it seriously that early??Jefferson9921 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:40 pm
Same former CA4 clerk. Yeah, she's arguably the most conservative judge on CA4.
Richardson is great. Super friendly, and it's an intellectually rigorous clerkship. My understanding is that he hires quite early. Seems like his clerks generally start directly after law school.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Best and worst judges to clerk for
What I have heard about Stras goes well beyond "not everyone's cup of tea"—that he is extremely demanding and a heavy micro-manager who often doesn't let his clerks take a single day or weekend off.Jefferson9921 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:06 pmThanks! Stras kind of seems like his legendary former boss, J. Michael Luttig, in the "not being everyone's cup of tea" regard. Not to pile on, but have you heard anything about what it's like to work for Rushing (CA4)?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:42 pmI have heard from a former Ho clerk that he is a good boss and that it was an enjoyable clerkship. That person is quite conservative, though, and I'm not sure he would be a good fit for a clerk of a different stripe.
I have heard quite negative things about Stras through the grapevine and from a professor who was on the faculty with him at Minnesota. I have also heard from someone who worked with him in private practice that he is a nice guy and was a good colleague. My guess is that he just isn't everyone's cup of tea.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Best and worst judges to clerk for
A staggering number of her clerks have quit early.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:27 pmAnyone know anything about M. Lauck? Her OSCAR posting is a little ridiculous - your recommenders have to specifically reference 2023? An online application AND a paper application? - which always makes me wary.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2025 3:12 pm
Re: Best and worst judges to clerk for
A Troubling Pattern of Judicial Misconduct – Scott Nord
It is deeply concerning to witness the continued abuse of judicial authority displayed by Judge Scott Nord. Over time, a pattern has emerged suggesting that he prioritizes personal bias over impartiality, often disregarding legal standards in favor of punitive and unjust decisions. Such conduct not only undermines public trust in the legal system but also has tangible, damaging consequences for the individuals who appear before him.
Numerous accounts point to Judge Nord using his position to intimidate, silence, or penalize those who challenge his authority, rather than upholding the fair application of the law. This kind of power misuse erodes the foundation of justice and raises serious questions about his fitness to preside over matters that demand neutrality and integrity.
Accountability is essential in every branch of government — and the judiciary is no exception. A judge must be held to the highest ethical standards. Unfortunately, based on what has come to light, Scott Nord appears to have fallen short of this responsibility.
Judge Scott Nord isa corrupt judge that should be arrested for his actions.
It is deeply concerning to witness the continued abuse of judicial authority displayed by Judge Scott Nord. Over time, a pattern has emerged suggesting that he prioritizes personal bias over impartiality, often disregarding legal standards in favor of punitive and unjust decisions. Such conduct not only undermines public trust in the legal system but also has tangible, damaging consequences for the individuals who appear before him.
Numerous accounts point to Judge Nord using his position to intimidate, silence, or penalize those who challenge his authority, rather than upholding the fair application of the law. This kind of power misuse erodes the foundation of justice and raises serious questions about his fitness to preside over matters that demand neutrality and integrity.
Accountability is essential in every branch of government — and the judiciary is no exception. A judge must be held to the highest ethical standards. Unfortunately, based on what has come to light, Scott Nord appears to have fallen short of this responsibility.
Judge Scott Nord isa corrupt judge that should be arrested for his actions.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Best and worst judges to clerk for
.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:36 pmClerked on ND Cal and Donato is one of the two judges there that I would encourage people to avoid, along with Armstrong, though I don't know if she's even taking term clerks anymore.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 12:49 pmHaven't heard precisely why but have been strongly urged to avoid Donato.
There are some absolute gems on ND Cal, it's a great place to clerk. Donato was a real outlier, temperament-wise, when I was there.