Harvard Grades 9th Circuit Forum

(Seek and share information about clerkship applications, clerkship hiring timelines, and post-clerkship employment opportunities)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:11 pm

I have worse grades than the previous poster, but does anyone have thoughts about me for COA? I am going to try for DC Cir and feeders/semi-feeders (though I don't actually know who falls in those categories yet), but I wouldn't mind having a non-feeder COA in a less desirable circuit (10th?). 2DS/5H/3P, already have my recommenders lined up and one is very good, though of a different political persuasion than me, so perhaps not super helpful. Suppose I also have an advanced degree that might be of interest to COA judges.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:15 pm

Anonymous User wrote:I have worse grades than the previous poster, but does anyone have thoughts about me for COA? I am going to try for DC Cir and feeders/semi-feeders (though I don't actually know who falls in those categories yet), but I wouldn't mind having a non-feeder COA in a less desirable circuit (10th?). 2DS/5H/3P, already have my recommenders lined up and one is very good, though of a different political persuasion than me, so perhaps not super helpful. Suppose I also have an advanced degree that might be of interest to COA judges.
You're sitting at -1 (1 more P than DS, rest H), which is probably in or real close to magna territory after 1L. You should be competitive most everywhere (especially as things can be somewhat of a crapshoot), but I would think you have an uphill shot at the D.C. Circuit and feeders. You should have a shot at some of the "semi-feeders" (not sure when this became a term, I like "occasional sends a clerk to SCOTUS" or something like that) and should be competitive for the non-feeders.

Slightly out of date: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4#p6326869
*UPDATED 3/5*

Below is the updated list of SCOTUS clerks by judge from OT 2009 to present (including the partially filled OT 2013 and 2014 classes). I included updates from the new ATL post and extended the list to include judges mentioned in this thread who had sent two clerks to the SCOTUS.

Also, I added the number of clerks each judge has sent to the Bristow Fellowship in the last four Bristow classes (only for judges already on the list). However, the rankings still only reflect the number of SCOTUS clerks.

1. Garland (D.C. Cir.), 20 + 1 Bristow
2. Kavanaugh (D.C. Cir.), 18 + 1 Bristow
3. Wilkinson (4th Cir.), 14 + 2 Bristows
4. Kozinski (9th Cir.), 10
4. Sutton (6th Cir.), 10 + 2 Bristows
6. Katzmann (2d Cir.), 9
7. Tatel (D.C. Cir.), 8 + 1 Bristow
8. Griffith (D.C. Cir.), 7
8. O'Scannlain (9th Cir.), 7
8. Reinhardt (9th Cir.), 7
11. D. Ginsburg (D.C. Cir.), 6
11. Gorsuch (10th Cir.), 6 + 1 Bristow
11. Calabresi (2d Cir.), 6
11. Fletcher (9th Cir.), 6 + 1 Bristow
15. Posner (7th Cir.), 5
15. J.R. Brown (D.C. Cir.), 5
17. Boudin (1st Cir.), 4 + 1 Bristow
17. Randolph (D.C. Cir.), 4 + 1 Bristow
19. E. Jones (5th Cir.), 3 + 1 Bristow
19. Sentelle (D.C. Cir.), 3
19. S. Williams (D.C. Cir.), 3
22. Carnes (11th), 2
22. Chagares (3d), 2
22. Colloton (8th), 2
22. Kethledge (6th), 2 + 2 Bristows
22. Leval (2d), 2
22. Niemeyer (4th), 2 + 1 Bristow
22. Pryor (11th), 2
22. Sack (2d), 2
22. Scirica (3d), 2

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:39 pm

Thanks :)

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:41 pm

Also, I think we should try and keep this discussion in the main HLS students thread, if we can. It's easier for people in the future to find this information out if it's all in one thread. Plus more people read and respond to that one.

User avatar
Doorkeeper

Gold
Posts: 4869
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Doorkeeper » Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I have worse grades than the previous poster, but does anyone have thoughts about me for COA? I am going to try for DC Cir and feeders/semi-feeders (though I don't actually know who falls in those categories yet), but I wouldn't mind having a non-feeder COA in a less desirable circuit (10th?). 2DS/5H/3P, already have my recommenders lined up and one is very good, though of a different political persuasion than me, so perhaps not super helpful. Suppose I also have an advanced degree that might be of interest to COA judges.
You're sitting at -1 (1 more P than DS, rest H), which is probably in or real close to magna territory after 1L. You should be competitive most everywhere (especially as things can be somewhat of a crapshoot), but I would think you have an uphill shot at the D.C. Circuit and feeders. You should have a shot at some of the "semi-feeders" (not sure when this became a term, I like "occasional sends a clerk to SCOTUS" or something like that) and should be competitive for the non-feeders.
I think this is spot on. There are maybe 3-4 feeders that you might be per se blocked from because of grades, but even then you're competitive enough to throw an app their way, especially if you have strong recommenders.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:25 am

Anyone have any knowledge re grades necessary for state supreme court (or any non-fed) clerkships? More H's than P's? Significantly more H's than P's? Roughly equal H's and P's?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:56 am

Anonymous User wrote:Anyone have any knowledge re grades necessary for state supreme court (or any non-fed) clerkships? More H's than P's? Significantly more H's than P's? Roughly equal H's and P's?
my understanding was that state supremes are somewhat less competitive than dist court clerkships..so i would say a few h's and you'll have a shot

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Harvard Grades 9th Circuit

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:20 am

I think that's true, with the possible exception of the Massachusetts SJC (where you probably want cum laude-ish grades at a minimum) and a couple of random SSC judges (e.g. Goodwin Liu, for whom you need feeder-level grades & credentials).

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Judicial Clerkships”