1. first off, we were asked about venue and I didn't know what to say because in my mind everything depended on whether subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction were proper...
2. A defendant made a motion to change the forum to the a new state (where it resided) and as part of my argument I said that this couldnt work because there was no personal jurisdiction over the plaintiff in the new forum.... does this even make sense!?
3. in one of the questions I freaked out and convinced myself that the CA superior court was a federal court

I don't even remember what else I said but I can't stop obsessing about how I think I got a little bit off topic making "my own" arguments & feel like I did bad.....
I have no way to assess what is good, what is bad, and what is normal....