What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles Forum
- Businesslady
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:41 am
What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
This post is not a joke. I already searched the forums for various terms (but not individual obscenities). I am writing an excellent article (as Businesslady, of course) that I would like to publish in as prestigious a law review as possible, and am wondering how turnt up I can get.
TYIA
TYIA
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
If you're an unknown author looking to get published in the most prestigious law review possible, you probably should keep the obscenities to a minimum.Businesslady wrote:This post is not a joke. I already searched the forums for various terms (but not individual obscenities). I am writing an excellent article (as Businesslady, of course) that I would like to publish in as prestigious a law review as possible, and am wondering how turnt up I can get.
TYIA
However, once you reach the level of Cass Sunstein or Akhil Amar, let the f-bombs fly.
- Businesslady
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:41 am
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
Which journals have blind selection
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:23 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
I dont think there is any such thing. The process is very intensive and there is a lot of interaction. There are some instances where profanity fits (if you are writing about it, SCOUTS cases etc.). in general, I would avoid it. It wont help you, and could make someone making the choice remember you for a bad reason.Businesslady wrote:Which journals have blind selection
- Aeon
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:46 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
Avoid profanity, unless you are directly quoting it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
http://www.slu.edu/Documents/law/Law%20 ... rticle.pdfAeon wrote:Avoid profanity, unless you are directly quoting it.
- bearsfan23
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
I think Ohio State is cool with it.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... _id=896790
Edit - I think this actually got published by Cardozo's Law Review
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... _id=896790
Edit - I think this actually got published by Cardozo's Law Review
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
bearsfan23 wrote:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... _id=896790
Understanding this relationship between law and taboo ultimately yields fuck jurisprudence.

- Businesslady
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:41 am
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
"Fuck" is actually a pretty important article, at least from a literary perspective. It's easily one of the most-read of all time in its genre, right?
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
Today I learned that the "bitch" in "99 problems, but a bitch ain't one," refers to the female dog from the k-9 unit that never sniffed Jay Z's car, and not a woman.Emma. wrote:http://www.slu.edu/Documents/law/Law%20 ... rticle.pdfAeon wrote:Avoid profanity, unless you are directly quoting it.
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:23 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
adpc hip-hop law class?Mal Reynolds wrote:Today I learned that the "bitch" in "99 problems, but a bitch ain't one," refers to the female dog from the k-9 unit that never sniffed Jay Z's car, and not a woman.Emma. wrote:http://www.slu.edu/Documents/law/Law%20 ... rticle.pdfAeon wrote:Avoid profanity, unless you are directly quoting it.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
And yet people still insist that legal scholarship is useless.Mal Reynolds wrote:Today I learned that the "bitch" in "99 problems, but a bitch ain't one," refers to the female dog from the k-9 unit that never sniffed Jay Z's car, and not a woman.Emma. wrote:http://www.slu.edu/Documents/law/Law%20 ... rticle.pdfAeon wrote:Avoid profanity, unless you are directly quoting it.
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cf ... 90&mirid=1Leo Stone, On the Principal Obscene Word of the English Language, 35 INT’L J. OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 30 (1954). There are now commentators who would disagree with Dr. Stone’s title. In their eyes, [racist language redacted] or cunt have replaced fuck as our most offensive terms. RICHARD DOOLING, BLUE STREAK 18 (1996) (“For centuries, fuck was the most objectionable word in the English language, but now [racist language redacted] and cunt are probably tied for that distinction, and fuck has at long last stepped down.”). One British study recently ranked fuck in third place behind motherfucker (second) and cunt (first). See History of the Word “Fuck,” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia,
This is the best footnote I've ever read.
One recent Internet search revealed that fuck “is a more commonly used word than mom, baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and Chevrolet.
Last edited by MKC on Sat Mar 14, 2015 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: What's the consensus on profanity in law review articles
What are you writing about BL?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login