Hey all, first time poster. (obv)
Anyone ever have attack blurbs they are ready to throw out when the time calls. For instance, if an advertisement question may come up on Contracts:
As a baseline rule, advertisements generally do not constitute offers (Restatement 26 comment b). Advertisements are generally initiations to accept an offer (Leanord v PepsiCo.), rather than an offer itself. In order for an ad to constitute an offer, it must be clear, explicit, definitive and leave nothing for negotiation. (Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus Store).
thoughts?
Attack Blurbs Forum
-
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:46 pm
Re: Attack Blurbs
I would rephrase but a heads up would be nice if I need to grab my aspie riot gearAdvertisements are generally initiations to accept an offer (Leanord v PepsiCo.), rather than an offer itself.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:17 pm
Re: Attack Blurbs
qlinault wrote:I would rephrase but a heads up would be nice if I need to grab my aspie riot gearAdvertisements are generally initiations to accept an offer (Leanord v PepsiCo.), rather than an offer itself.
invitations to bargain*
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: Attack Blurbs
Yeah this is a good idea but:Restatement90 wrote:Hey all, first time poster. (obv)
Anyone ever have attack blurbs they are ready to throw out when the time calls. For instance, if an advertisement question may come up on Contracts:
As a baseline rule, advertisements generally do not constitute offers (Restatement 26 comment b). Advertisements are generally initiations to accept an offer (Leanord v PepsiCo.), rather than an offer itself. In order for an ad to constitute an offer, it must be clear, explicit, definitive and leave nothing for negotiation. (Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus Store).
thoughts?
(1) Don't copy/paste if your exam rules/honor system doesn't allow you to
(2) Something this length may not run into the problem, but don't get much longer b/c you don't want to be writing long passages with no application of the law to the fact pattern. This would be a good opening part of a paragraph where you then say something like "Here, Mr. X didn't make a clear offer when he yelled it outside of his moving car passing Mr. Y"
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:17 pm
Re: Attack Blurbs
Sounds good. Thank you!Br3v wrote:Yeah this is a good idea but:Restatement90 wrote:Hey all, first time poster. (obv)
Anyone ever have attack blurbs they are ready to throw out when the time calls. For instance, if an advertisement question may come up on Contracts:
As a baseline rule, advertisements generally do not constitute offers (Restatement 26 comment b). Advertisements are generally initiations to accept an offer (Leanord v PepsiCo.), rather than an offer itself. In order for an ad to constitute an offer, it must be clear, explicit, definitive and leave nothing for negotiation. (Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus Store).
thoughts?
(1) Don't copy/paste if your exam rules/honor system doesn't allow you to
(2) Something this length may not run into the problem, but don't get much longer b/c you don't want to be writing long passages with no application of the law to the fact pattern. This would be a good opening part of a paragraph where you then say something like "Here, Mr. X didn't make a clear offer when he yelled it outside of his moving car passing Mr. Y"
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login