Torts rule statement- Battery, Assult, IIED, False Imp., Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
cheetarah20002000

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:00 pm

Torts rule statement- Battery, Assult, IIED, False Imp.,

Post by cheetarah20002000 » Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:09 pm

I am working on my rule statements for Battery, Assault, IIED, False Imprisonment, Damages as they apply, Necessity, trespass to property and chattel, and possible defenses to all of these. I am having trouble deciding what to weed out and what is important. Any suggestions or examples to help? My 1st midterm is Wed.

User avatar
silvermanbar

New
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:09 pm

Re: Torts rule statement- Battery, Assult, IIED, False Imp.,

Post by silvermanbar » Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:28 pm

The best way to analyze a legal issue is to break the rule down into its elements and let the grader know that you are analyzing each individual element. So, let's take battery for example.

Batter is the (1) intentional, (2) harmful or offensive contact (3) with another (4) without the other's consent. Here, (1) has been satisfied because......


It may seem a bit much, but this style will make the exam very easy for your professor to grade, and hitting upon each element will surely earn you many points that others might miss with a less analytical approach.

--Sean

Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”