Fiduciary Duty Issue

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
AJS30

Bronze
Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:57 pm

Fiduciary Duty Issue

Post by AJS30 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:20 pm

If a board decides to invest a substantial amount of money in a PR/lobbying campaign, which will be kept confidential, but this campaign goes against information that was sent to shareholders, what claims can shareholders bring? The only thing I am thinking of is a duty of disclosure- where the board has to be honest with shareholders. I feel like I am missing other issues though...

User avatar
northwood

Platinum
Posts: 5036
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Fiduciary Duty Issue

Post by northwood » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:24 pm

Analyze whether if that action somehow negatively impacted their revenue (think profits). I took this course Fall 2L and I vaguely remember it ( I graduate in May), but I think there could be a cause of action or a few that may be applicable in this type of case.

User avatar
ph14

Gold
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Fiduciary Duty Issue

Post by ph14 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:28 pm

AJS30 wrote:If a board decides to invest a substantial amount of money in a PR/lobbying campaign, which will be kept confidential, but this campaign goes against information that was sent to shareholders, what claims can shareholders bring? The only thing I am thinking of is a duty of disclosure- where the board has to be honest with shareholders. I feel like I am missing other issues though...
Are you sure your cause of action is limited to fiduciary duty? Could there be another sort of cause of action that might apply? I took the course a while ago, so I can't remember, but might there be an SEC rule(s) that could apply?

User avatar
ph14

Gold
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Fiduciary Duty Issue

Post by ph14 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:32 pm

ph14 wrote:
AJS30 wrote:If a board decides to invest a substantial amount of money in a PR/lobbying campaign, which will be kept confidential, but this campaign goes against information that was sent to shareholders, what claims can shareholders bring? The only thing I am thinking of is a duty of disclosure- where the board has to be honest with shareholders. I feel like I am missing other issues though...
Are you sure your cause of action is limited to fiduciary duty? Could there be another sort of cause of action that might apply? I took the course a while ago, so I can't remember, but might there be an SEC rule(s) that could apply?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/240.14a-9
§ 240.14a-9 False or misleading statements.
(a) No solicitation subject to this regulation shall be made by means of any proxy statement, form of proxy, notice of meeting or other communication, written or oral, containing any statement which, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it is made, is false or misleading with respect to any material fact, or which omits to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein not false or misleading or necessary to correct any statement in any earlier communication with respect to the solicitation of a proxy for the same meeting or subject matter which has become false or misleading.
(b) The fact that a proxy statement, form of proxy or other soliciting material has been filed with or examined by the Commission shall not be deemed a finding by the Commission that such material is accurate or complete or not false or misleading, or that the Commission has passed upon the merits of or approved any statement contained therein or any matter to be acted upon by security holders. No representation contrary to the foregoing shall be made.
(c) No nominee, nominating shareholder or nominating shareholder group, or any member thereof, shall cause to be included in a registrant's proxy materials, either pursuant to the Federal proxy rules, an applicable state or foreign law provision, or a registrant's governing documents as they relate to including shareholder nominees for director in a registrant's proxy materials, include in a notice on Schedule 14N (§ 240.14n-101), or include in any other related communication, any statement which, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it is made, is false or misleading with respect to any material fact, or which omits to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein not false or misleading or necessary to correct any statement in any earlier communication with respect to a solicitation for the same meeting or subject matter which has become false or misleading.
Note:
The following are some examples of what, depending upon particular facts and circumstances, may be misleading within the meaning of this section.
a. Predictions as to specific future market values.
b. Material which directly or indirectly impugns character, integrity or personal reputation, or directly or indirectly makes charges concerning improper, illegal or immoral conduct or associations, without factual foundation.
c. Failure to so identify a proxy statement, form of proxy and other soliciting material as to clearly distinguish it from the soliciting material of any other person or persons soliciting for the same meeting or subject matter.
d. Claims made prior to a meeting regarding the results of a solicitation.
[31 FR 212, Jan. 7, 1966, as amended at 41 FR 19933, May 14, 1976; 44 FR 38815, July 2, 1979; 44 FR 68456, Nov. 29, 1979; 75 FR 56782, Sept. 16, 2010]
http://taft.law.uc.edu/CCL/34ActRls/reg14A.html

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”