Drop admin or conlaw ii? Forum
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:51 pm
Drop admin or conlaw ii?
I know I asked this before recently, but I've narrowed down to conlaw ii vs admin. I prefer issue spotting exams, and will be taking corporations at the same time. I also prefer to learn from supplements. Any advice? The effect on my schedule will be about the same
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Drop admin or conlaw ii?
Good god do not drop Con Law for Admin. Con Law II is a CAKE WALK with the right tools. I am talking little to no reading.victortsoi wrote:I know I asked this before recently, but I've narrowed down to conlaw ii vs admin. I prefer issue spotting exams, and will be taking corporations at the same time. I also prefer to learn from supplements. Any advice? The effect on my schedule will be about the same
Admin = hell.
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:51 pm
Re: Drop admin or conlaw ii?
Thanks....I guess i'm maybe letting my previous experiences with con law I ruin my "appetite" for con law ii. I guess I just don't look forward to writing an exam discussing what scalia ate that affected his vote in a certain case, as opposed to a good old fashioned issue spotter. OTOH, admin is con law "like" from other things I hear. I'm just not sure...UnderrateOverachieve wrote:Good god do not drop Con Law for Admin. Con Law II is a CAKE WALK with the right tools. I am talking little to no reading.victortsoi wrote:I know I asked this before recently, but I've narrowed down to conlaw ii vs admin. I prefer issue spotting exams, and will be taking corporations at the same time. I also prefer to learn from supplements. Any advice? The effect on my schedule will be about the same
Admin = hell.
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Drop admin or conlaw ii?
Treat it as a structured class and it will amazingly become structured. Force yourself to stick to a more rigid line of argumentation. Scrutiny prongs, specific arguments and counter arguments, and self-made planned lines of argument.victortsoi wrote:Thanks....I guess i'm maybe letting my previous experiences with con law I ruin my "appetite" for con law ii. I guess I just don't look forward to writing an exam discussing what scalia ate that affected his vote in a certain case, as opposed to a good old fashioned issue spotter. OTOH, admin is con law "like" from other things I hear. I'm just not sure...UnderrateOverachieve wrote:Good god do not drop Con Law for Admin. Con Law II is a CAKE WALK with the right tools. I am talking little to no reading.victortsoi wrote:I know I asked this before recently, but I've narrowed down to conlaw ii vs admin. I prefer issue spotting exams, and will be taking corporations at the same time. I also prefer to learn from supplements. Any advice? The effect on my schedule will be about the same
Admin = hell.
The self-made lines I am thinking of are something like, history -> precedent -> current societal norms. Something like that. You can make it a lot less wishy washy. Just attack each issue like you are writing a brief on behalf of a client and not like you are writing a poly sci theoretical paper.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login