Antitrust Forum
- Jsa725
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Antitrust
My professors focus on the economics. There's very little on these exams that looks anything like the cases I read.Jsa725 wrote:sup my dude. what worries you?
- Jsa725
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 4:56 pm
Re: Antitrust
Can anyone explain when § 3 of the Clayton Act can be used? I know § 7 is for mergers, but what is § 3 specifically used to enforce?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jsa725
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Antitrust
anyone got some good practice exams? Like something with some answers. Even CALI has nothing. So if anyone can point me in the right direction that would be fantastic. Thanks
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Antitrust
They present the question in a way so that you won't be able to recognize the form of the transaction.Jsa725 wrote:in what way do your profs focus on economics? plz elaborate, perhaps i can help. feel free to PM.3|ink wrote:My professors focus on the economics. There's very little on these exams that looks anything like the cases I read.Jsa725 wrote:sup my dude. what worries you?
Example: Market definition.
One question on last year's exam requires you to determine whether a premium version of a product is in a separate market from the brand market. Imagine there are four manufacturers who make the brand and premium version. Each competitor sells the brand and premium version at the same prices. When one of four manufacturer's slightly reduced the price on its premium product, a large number of consumers switched from the brand to this competitor's premium product. In fact, the overall market sales for the premium product nearly doubled. From this, I believe we're supposed to infer that the products are substitutes. Therefore, none of the firms could really have market power in the premium market.
- Jsa725
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Antitrust
No it wasn't a merger question. The premium seller ultimately engaged in conduct to remain the top premium seller. The implied question was whether that amounted to monopoly maintenance (the test just asked if the conduct was illegal). The answer depended entirely on the market definition.
- Jsa725
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login