Hello:
For establishing diversity jurisdiction involving aliens as litigants, are these hypotheticals correct?
CA v. French citizen – allowed
CA v. NY + French citizen – allowed
French citizen v. CA – allowed
French citizen v. English Citizen + CA – not allowed
French citizen + CA v. French citizen – not allowed
French citizen + CA v. French citizen + AZ – allowed
French citizen v. English Citizen – not allowed, unless one is a LPR and established domicile in a US state
Thanks for any help!
Diversity Jurisdiction for Aliens Forum
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: Diversity Jurisdiction for Aliens
Don't know what LPR is but otherwise correct. I assume LPR means the alien is domociled perm in a state, in which case I think alien is still treated as alien with the additional limitation of not being div from citizens of that state.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Diversity Jurisdiction for Aliens
LPR = legal permenant resident. I think these are all correct.