Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant? Forum
-
BigRob

- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 8:30 pm
Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
"Third-trimester abortion should probably be illegal."
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
-
snagglepuss

- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:16 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Ideally, how do you see this thread playing out?
-
hephaestus

- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
- atcushman

- Posts: 383
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:08 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
snagglepuss wrote:Ideally, how do you see this thread playing out?

- Nova

- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Join Fed Soc, bro
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- stillwater

- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
what was most outrageous was when my professor, man, the gall that one has, suggested the statute of frauds, THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS, was indeed just that - a fraud.
- atcushman

- Posts: 383
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:08 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
My legal writing prof tonight said you are morally bankrupt if you use 2 spaces instead of 1 after a period. I believe this is an attack on traditional American values
-
BeenDidThat

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:18 am
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Why in the fuck did you not use this opportunity to go Socratic on the prof?BigRob wrote:"Third-trimester abortion should probably be illegal."
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
- Merylian

- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:46 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Why voice your opinion on a controversial issue in class, instead of just sticking to talking about the judicial opinion?BigRob wrote:"Third-trimester abortion should probably be illegal."
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
-
Gotallanswers

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:36 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Because they dont pay taxes yet and have been around the government benefits all their life such as schools. Once you go to the private sector that all changes, the brain washing ends
- Totalimmortal

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Hah, this thread made me think of when some kid in Federal Income Taxation decided to call Mitt Romney an "idiot" on the first day of class. Politics aside, I don't think it's smart to call a guy with a J.D./M.B.A. from Harvard an idiot when you're just some prick at a school only just in the T50. But that's just my opinion. Lol
- bjsesq

- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Was in SecReg talking about Reg S and flowback. Decided to talk about historical justifications for breastfeeding in public. Prof called me weird. What a fucking douche prof.
-
Samuel Patane

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:24 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
My professor made us do a paper on how Obamacare should be deemed constitutional. I bet that one really hurt the Republicans in the class.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
sf_39

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:33 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Conclusory thread yo
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
My contracts professor wrote a few amicus briefs for the SC against the constitutionality of Obama care.
-
kaiser

- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
I'm the first to admit that the one-dimensional nature of the law school experience served to stifle genuine debate on various topics. But at the same time, I can't understand why your view on when abortions should or should not be legal is at all relevant to your class discussion.BigRob wrote:"Third-trimester abortion should probably be illegal."
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
- brotherdarkness

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
.
Last edited by brotherdarkness on Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Totalimmortal

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
I made a similar comment that it is odd that the father cannot sign a waiver of all rights and obligations, as long as an abortion would have been legal at that time in that state.brotherdarkness wrote:Not OP (obviously), but we had a discussion about the legality of abortion in my Constitutional Law class and our professor was asking for our opinions. I suggested that, though I understood the reasoning, it was unsettling that a woman could decide to abort our child irrespective of my hypothetical desire to have the child yet, if a woman wanted to have a child and I didn't, I was powerless and could be forced to support the child (financially, at least). I was promptly called ignorant by a female classmate.kaiser wrote:I'm the first to admit that the one-dimensional nature of the law school experience served to stifle genuine debate on various topics. But at the same time, I can't understand why your view on when abortions should or should not be legal is at all relevant to your class discussion.BigRob wrote:"Third-trimester abortion should probably be illegal."
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
- TTRansfer

- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
If only more boomers were aborted.
- Lockfast

- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Hmm I hadn't considered that argument/thought before. Makes sense to me though. But, then again, we (as males) aren't the ones carrying a parasite, aka fetus, for 9 months of hell (or, so it seems).brotherdarkness wrote:Not OP (obviously), but we had a discussion about the legality of abortion in my Constitutional Law class and our professor was asking for our opinions. I suggested that, though I understood the reasoning, it was unsettling that a woman could decide to abort our child irrespective of my hypothetical desire to have the child yet, if a woman wanted to have a child and I didn't, I was powerless and could be forced to support the child (financially, at least). I was promptly called ignorant by a female classmate.kaiser wrote:I'm the first to admit that the one-dimensional nature of the law school experience served to stifle genuine debate on various topics. But at the same time, I can't understand why your view on when abortions should or should not be legal is at all relevant to your class discussion.BigRob wrote:"Third-trimester abortion should probably be illegal."
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
-
justgottabezen

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 2:35 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
Not to be a dick but you're not powerless. Pregnancy is the result of a voluntary action: sex. You both take that risk when you have sex and should consider the consequences. If you don't want to pay for the support of a child get some damn good contraception or don't have sex. Giving an ultimatum of "have an abortion or you're on your own" seems unfair. It's a medical procedure that can have serious complications. Unless she poked a hole in the condom or something, why should the burden be completely on the woman?Totalimmortal wrote:I made a similar comment that it is odd that the father cannot sign a waiver of all rights and obligations, as long as an abortion would have been legal at that time in that state.brotherdarkness wrote:Not OP (obviously), but we had a discussion about the legality of abortion in my Constitutional Law class and our professor was asking for our opinions. I suggested that, though I understood the reasoning, it was unsettling that a woman could decide to abort our child irrespective of my hypothetical desire to have the child yet, if a woman wanted to have a child and I didn't, I was powerless and could be forced to support the child (financially, at least). I was promptly called ignorant by a female classmate.kaiser wrote:I'm the first to admit that the one-dimensional nature of the law school experience served to stifle genuine debate on various topics. But at the same time, I can't understand why your view on when abortions should or should not be legal is at all relevant to your class discussion.BigRob wrote:"Third-trimester abortion should probably be illegal."
"GO FUCK YOURSELF, NAZI"
And that was my professor.
-
BigRob

- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 8:30 pm
Re: Law school, y u so liberal & intolerant?
So you're a proponent of the "conniving bitch" exception to the rule. (I think "forgetting" to take the pill is more common than condom-poking, btw.)justgottabezen wrote:Not to be a dick but you're not powerless. Pregnancy is the result of a voluntary action: sex. You both take that risk when you have sex and should consider the consequences. If you don't want to pay for the support of a child get some damn good contraception or don't have sex. Giving an ultimatum of "have an abortion or you're on your own" seems unfair. It's a medical procedure that can have serious complications. Unless she poked a hole in the condom or something, why should the burden be completely on the woman?Totalimmortal wrote:I made a similar comment that it is odd that the father cannot sign a waiver of all rights and obligations, as long as an abortion would have been legal at that time in that state.brotherdarkness wrote:Not OP (obviously), but we had a discussion about the legality of abortion in my Constitutional Law class and our professor was asking for our opinions. I suggested that, though I understood the reasoning, it was unsettling that a woman could decide to abort our child irrespective of my hypothetical desire to have the child yet, if a woman wanted to have a child and I didn't, I was powerless and could be forced to support the child (financially, at least). I was promptly called ignorant by a female classmate.kaiser wrote: I'm the first to admit that the one-dimensional nature of the law school experience served to stifle genuine debate on various topics. But at the same time, I can't understand why your view on when abortions should or should not be legal is at all relevant to your class discussion.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login