Berryman v. Komach: Option Contracts & Promissory Estoppel Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
echooo23

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:29 pm

Berryman v. Komach: Option Contracts & Promissory Estoppel

Post by echooo23 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:07 pm

I'm trying to glean the rule from Berryman v. Kmoch. Can someone help? Option contracts must be supported by consideration. If no monetary consideration, then part performance in reliance may be valid consideration? However, the consideration must be to the benefit of the optionor? Not clear on where this motive v. consideration and binding promise v. illusory promise thing comes in.

User avatar
Jsa725

Gold
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: Berryman v. Komach: Option Contracts & Promissory Estoppel

Post by Jsa725 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:50 pm

.

Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”