Bluebook rage Forum
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Bluebook rage
I've been looking through the BB to find the freaking rules for this and looking through 13.4 I just don't know how to put the thing together? Can anyone take pity on a poor 1L and help?
"In a discussion of the legislative history of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988, you cite to a 1988 report from the Senate Judiciary Committee. This report was the 599th report in the 100th Congress. You want to cite to information in part III(A) of the report."
"In a discussion of the legislative history of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988, you cite to a 1988 report from the Senate Judiciary Committee. This report was the 599th report in the 100th Congress. You want to cite to information in part III(A) of the report."
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Bluebook rage
S. Rep. No. 100-599, pt. 3(A) (1988). 
Just my whack at it, and god knows I'm no expert.

Just my whack at it, and god knows I'm no expert.
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Ok thanks! Looks pretty good so I'll go with it =) thanks so muchrinkrat19 wrote:S. Rep. No. 100-599, pt. 3(A) (1988).
Just my whack at it, and god knows I'm no expert.
- Pokemon
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
The bluebook is a torture machine with no purpose. I cannot believe it is still around. Someone needs to write a law review article about the time losses/economic inefficiencies that thing causes.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dood
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am
Re: Bluebook rage
been done, that someone is posner:Pokemon wrote:The bluebook is a torture machine with no purpose. I cannot believe it is still around. Someone needs to write a law review article about the time losses/economic inefficiencies that thing causes.
--LinkRemoved--
TL;DR:
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/01/quote-of ... -bluebook/
- Devlin
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:34 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
God damn ICWLawbro wrote:Are you doing the ICW's?
- dood
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am
Re: Bluebook rage
side note - appendix 2 in posner's article (his rules for his clerks) is particularly useful in the real world. contrary to what they tell u, the bluebook is largely irrelevant after law school.
- nealric
- Posts: 4390
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Seconded on the worthlessness of the Bluebook. It has become such a bloated mess that practitioners mostly ignore it (even more so for non-litigators).
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
ph14 wrote:Bluebook logic: It's BYU L. Rev. but N.Y.U. L. Rev..
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Thanks for all the sympathy guys/gals, I will return with more ICW suffering (4 more lessons to go!) and I appreciate y'all help!
- Pokemon
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
Speaking of Posner, I cannot help but be annoyed that an English major has become the father of law and economics. Not only that, but he had said that he does not like reading economics books if they have a lot of math.....dood wrote:been done, that someone is posner:Pokemon wrote:The bluebook is a torture machine with no purpose. I cannot believe it is still around. Someone needs to write a law review article about the time losses/economic inefficiencies that thing causes.
--LinkRemoved--
TL;DR:
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/01/quote-of ... -bluebook/
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Why.....I can't figure this one out. My answer is all blue (i.e. correct, which means i'm missing something)
------------------------
6) You are researching Texas family law for an office memorandum. Your law office does not have any state materials, but you found the applicable provision, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001, using LexisNexis. The screen in LexisNexis states that the text as it appears is current through the end of the 2009 Session.
Incorrect Citation: Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001 (LEXIS through 2009 Sess.).
Hints:
Parenthetical: Have you given publisher information? T1.3 Texas
Check general format, spelling, spacing, and punctuation.
---------------------------------------------
Why is my answer all blue T.T?
Edited..
------------------------
6) You are researching Texas family law for an office memorandum. Your law office does not have any state materials, but you found the applicable provision, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001, using LexisNexis. The screen in LexisNexis states that the text as it appears is current through the end of the 2009 Session.
Incorrect Citation: Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001 (LEXIS through 2009 Sess.).
Hints:
Parenthetical: Have you given publisher information? T1.3 Texas
Check general format, spelling, spacing, and punctuation.
---------------------------------------------
Why is my answer all blue T.T?
Edited..
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
Do you have Tex. Fam. Code Ann. in small caps?muddup wrote:Why.....I can't figure this one out. My answer is all blue (i.e. correct, which means i'm missing something)
------------------------
6) You are researching Texas family law for an office memorandum. Your law office does not have any state materials, but you found the applicable provision, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001, using LexisNexis. The screen in LexisNexis states that the text as it appears is current through the end of the 2009 Session.
Incorrect Citation: Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001 (LEXIS through 2009 Sess.).
Hints:
Parenthetical: Have you given publisher information? T1.3 Texas
Check general format, spelling, spacing, and punctuation.
---------------------------------------------
Why is my answer all blue T.T?
Edited..
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Ya I do, the trick is apparently "Parenthetical, Have you given publisher information? T1.3 Texas".
But I don't know wtf they are talking about. This is ridiculous...sigh
But I don't know wtf they are talking about. This is ridiculous...sigh
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
Try, just for laughs, "(West 2009)"muddup wrote:Ya I do, the trick is apparently "Parenthetical, Have you given publisher information? T1.3 Texas".
But I don't know wtf they are talking about. This is ridiculous...sigh
Edit: Also try "(Lexis 2009)"
Last edited by ph14 on Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
- BullShitWithBravado
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 8:29 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
Buy the online version. So worth it.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Haha XD that ain't gonna work.
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Re: Bluebook rage
WHAT THE FUK
Correct Citation: Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001 (West, LEXIS through 2009 Sess.).
Correct Citation: Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001 (West, LEXIS through 2009 Sess.).
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
Oh man that was a great read. Fuck the blue book.dood wrote:been done, that someone is posner:Pokemon wrote:The bluebook is a torture machine with no purpose. I cannot believe it is still around. Someone needs to write a law review article about the time losses/economic inefficiencies that thing causes.
--LinkRemoved--
TL;DR:
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/01/quote-of ... -bluebook/
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
Considering that he's actually read Keynes, whereas a plethora of economists haven't, I don't think it's that annoyingPokemon wrote:Speaking of Posner, I cannot help but be annoyed that an English major has become the father of law and economics. Not only that, but he had said that he does not like reading economics books if they have a lot of math.....dood wrote:been done, that someone is posner:Pokemon wrote:The bluebook is a torture machine with no purpose. I cannot believe it is still around. Someone needs to write a law review article about the time losses/economic inefficiencies that thing causes.
--LinkRemoved--
TL;DR:
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/01/quote-of ... -bluebook/
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Bluebook rage
Posner is the mandingbat wrote:Considering that he's actually read Keynes, whereas a plethora of economists haven't, I don't think it's that annoyingPokemon wrote:Speaking of Posner, I cannot help but be annoyed that an English major has become the father of law and economics. Not only that, but he had said that he does not like reading economics books if they have a lot of math.....dood wrote:been done, that someone is posner:Pokemon wrote:The bluebook is a torture machine with no purpose. I cannot believe it is still around. Someone needs to write a law review article about the time losses/economic inefficiencies that thing causes.
--LinkRemoved--
TL;DR:
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/01/quote-of ... -bluebook/
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Texas codes will always have West in the parenthetical, at least for law school purposes. No one gives a shit once you start practicing, you can just cite to the code and the year.muddup wrote:WHAT THE FUK
Correct Citation: Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 8.001 (West, LEXIS through 2009 Sess.).
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:23 am
Re: Bluebook rage
Thanks for all the help and consolation thus far. Round 101:
How do I put a citation in the middle of the sentence, if I have two citations total? Does this look right?
"Every law student has to work hard," Bob 34 U.S. 129, "but not too long." Joe 34 U.S. 534.
Is that right? Or do I use semi-colons? Most importantly where is the freaking rule for this in the BB?
How do I put a citation in the middle of the sentence, if I have two citations total? Does this look right?
"Every law student has to work hard," Bob 34 U.S. 129, "but not too long." Joe 34 U.S. 534.
Is that right? Or do I use semi-colons? Most importantly where is the freaking rule for this in the BB?
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Bluebook rage
That's pretty much right. I fixed a few things. (That's assuming you've cited the cases previously, of course.) I have no idea where the rule is in the BB, but that's what I was taught, anyway.muddup wrote:Thanks for all the help and consolation thus far. Round 101:
How do I put a citation in the middle of the sentence, if I have two citations total? Does this look right?
"Every law student has to work hard," Bob, 34 U.S. at 129, "but not too long." Joe, 34 U.S. at 534.
Is that right? Or do I use semi-colons? Most importantly where is the freaking rule for this in the BB?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login