Evidence

dilemma101 · Post by **dilemma101** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:05 pm

For those of you who have taken evidence, did you get anything from professor's lecture? I ask because I am finding between the case book and Emanuel's, the lectures seem redundant. Am I missing something or is evidence relatively straightforward compared to most other classes?

Note that we are not yet at hearsay.

kalvano · Post by **kalvano** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:12 am

It depends on the final. Mine was entirely M/C, so I watched hockey games during class. If it's more subjective, what the prof says will matter more.

istara · Post by **istara** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:49 am

I'm hoping that more repetition means less difficulty memorizing all this for the closed book MC final..

kalvano · Post by **kalvano** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:10 pm

CALI is good for M/C finals.

LAWYER2 · Post by **LAWYER2** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:17 pm

I had a four hour long Evidence class, the professor droned on and on and on! The E&E and Professor Rossi (sum & substance CD's) got me through Evidence with a B which I gladly accepted and never looked back

dilemma101 · Post by **dilemma101** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:18 pm

To the poster above, in theory, if Rossi was my professor, I could live off the e&e, his barbri lectures, and his sum and substance CDs?

LAWYER2 · Post by **LAWYER2** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:22 pm

dilemma101 wrote:To the poster above, in theory, if Rossi was my professor, I could live off the e&e, his barbri lectures, and his sum and substance CDs?

wholeheartedly

Evidence

Evidence

Re: Evidence

Re: Evidence

Re: Evidence

Re: Evidence

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Evidence

Re: Evidence

Register for access!

Clerkship, Spring

Clerkship, Fall

Summer Internship