Law Schools Cut Admissions Forum
- morally0bese
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 6:01 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
"Still, most law schools aren't planning to shrink. They include Thomas M. Cooley Law School, the largest in the nation, with 3,700 students, and among the first to be sued over its job-placement numbers."
"Cooley 'isn't interested in reducing the size of its entering class on the basis of the perceived benefit to society,' says associate dean James Robb."
"Cooley 'isn't interested in reducing the size of its entering class on the basis of the perceived benefit to society,' says associate dean James Robb."
- Pate
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
A couple of stories to check out. . . second one is for facebook.
EDIT: Wonder if this data is true: Two out of three 2011 law school graduates did not get real legal jobs
http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot. ... chool.html
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pag ... 8152800236
EDIT: Wonder if this data is true: Two out of three 2011 law school graduates did not get real legal jobs
http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot. ... chool.html
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pag ... 8152800236
- morally0bese
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 6:01 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
Thanks for posting these article Pate. Good to see a Gator on here (go Canes!)
btw have you read the comments on the WSJ article. Doesn't make one feel great about our life choice.
btw have you read the comments on the WSJ article. Doesn't make one feel great about our life choice.
-
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:14 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
The "1 out of 3 real legal jobs" came from slopping together a bunch of numbers, many of which may not be alluding to the same thing. It might be right; it might be better or worse.Pate wrote:A couple of stories to check out. . . second one is for facebook.
EDIT: Wonder if this data is true: Two out of three 2011 law school graduates did not get real legal jobs
http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot. ... chool.html
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pag ... 8152800236
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
Interesting that the article points out that many universities are reluctant to cut class sizes in order to maintain profits. "Law schools are considered profit centers at many universities."
- Pate
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
>
Last edited by Pate on Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- spleenworship
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
As mentioned above, the numbers might not necessarily apply to each other. The other issue I see with that article is that they are using data which covers all the law schools. Even the crappy ones with like 25% employment in full time bar required jobs... some names spring to mind (though I am not 100% on their actual job stats): Thomas Jefferson and Barry and Tuoro and Cooley and what have you.Pate wrote:A couple of stories to check out. . . second one is for facebook.
EDIT: Wonder if this data is true: Two out of three 2011 law school graduates did not get real legal jobs
If you are going to a T14/T1/Strong Regional T2 these numbers are probably not nearly as grim for you personally. If NALP excluded the bottom 50 law schools I bet the numbers would run like 50% employment even using the article's dubious methodology.
- Pate
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
+1. I think the message is, if you are willing to take the LS risk, only focus on Tier 1 on up.
I personally do not buy the premise that Law Schools are, or will be, notably cutting admissions. Chances are most of them will ride this crazed bubble as long as they can fill $eats. I do not see long waitlists on the lessor ranked schools, to me that means they are still herding in whomever shows up.
I personally do not buy the premise that Law Schools are, or will be, notably cutting admissions. Chances are most of them will ride this crazed bubble as long as they can fill $eats. I do not see long waitlists on the lessor ranked schools, to me that means they are still herding in whomever shows up.
- I.P. Daly
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
It looks like some schools really are cutting back...Pate wrote:+1. I think the message is, if you are willing to take the LS risk, only focus on Tier 1 on up.
I personally do not buy the premise that Law Schools are, or will be, notably cutting admissions. Chances are most of them will ride this crazed bubble as long as they can fill $eats. I do not see long waitlists on the lessor ranked schools, to me that means they are still herding in whomever shows up.
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... shall.html
However, it appears that most schools are not.
- spleenworship
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 pm
Re: Law Schools Cut Admissions
i think I read about 10% are, somewhere.I.P. Daly wrote:It looks like some schools really are cutting back...Pate wrote:+1. I think the message is, if you are willing to take the LS risk, only focus on Tier 1 on up.
I personally do not buy the premise that Law Schools are, or will be, notably cutting admissions. Chances are most of them will ride this crazed bubble as long as they can fill $eats. I do not see long waitlists on the lessor ranked schools, to me that means they are still herding in whomever shows up.
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... shall.html
However, it appears that most schools are not.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login