Contracts... Forum

[nelaw2010]

I'm using the following books:

Contracts: Cases and Doctrine, Fourth Edition, Randy E. Barnett
Contract Law: Selected Source Materials Annotated, 2011; Burton & Eisenburg

Can anyone recommend good supplements for these? I heard Chirlestein (sp) is good. Also the Blum E&E.

Does anyone know which might be better given the casebook I'm using?

Thanks again!

[thegrayman]

E&E isn't bad but it's really wordy, the glannon E&E's are much better at getting to the point

[nelaw2010]

Thanks!

[Extension_Cord]

I'm selling the previous edition of the E&E, the Q&A, and the previous edition of Chirelstein. Let me know if your interested, I can send you an invoice via paypal.

[Extension_Cord]

I'm selling the previous edition of the E&E, the Q&A, and the previous edition of Chirelstein. Let me know if your interested, I can send you an invoice via paypal.

$38 shipped via media mail tomorrow. Chirelstein and E&E are in good condition, Q&A in very good condition.

[hawkeye22]

I liked Gilbert's

[AreJay711]

I thought the Crunchtime was good.

[rbgrocio]

I'm using the following books:

Contracts: Cases and Doctrine, Fourth Edition, Randy E. Barnett
Contract Law: Selected Source Materials Annotated, 2011; Burton & Eisenburg

Can anyone recommend good supplements for these? I heard Chirlestein (sp) is good. Also the Blum E&E.

Does anyone know which might be better given the casebook I'm using?

Thanks again!

I honestly do not recommend using supplements. I know everyone uses them; I personally dislike them.

[picklebarrel]

I wasn't a big fan of the E&E, definitely not as good as Glannon.

Chirelstein was great. Very clear and concise so you don't have to spend too much time on a topic.

[morris248]

Acing Contracts is your best option for exam prep

Acing Contracts

[jjlaw]

If you had to pick one -- E&E or Crunchtime?

[northwood]

crunchtime

i have the e& e and i dont like it/ find it helpful- maybe because my prof didnt touch the UCC

[jjlaw]

crunchtime

i have the e& e and i dont like it/ find it helpful- maybe because my prof didnt touch the UCC

What is the difference? Are the hypos not as helpful in the E&E?

[homestyle28]

I think it depends on your situation. Acing contracts is really helpful for constructing an outline/checklisting. I like (and my Prof who used the Barnett casebook recomended) "Concepts and Case Analysis in the Law of Contracts" by Marvin Chirelstein. It's pretty succinct, but informative.

[thesteelers]

Blum's E&E actually probably prevented me from failing Contracts today.

On the other hand, I probably got a C in Contracts. So. Not exactly fist pumping for Blum either.