Statute of Frauds Forum
-
johansantana21
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Statute of Frauds
Does the sale of goods $500 or more require writing only when between merchants or for everyone? It's UCC section 2-201(1)?
-
Extension_Cord
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:15 pm
Re: Statute of Frauds
everyonejohansantana21 wrote:Does the sale of goods $500 or more require writing only when between merchants or for everyone? It's UCC section 2-201(1)?
-
Renzo
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Statute of Frauds
yep.Extension_Cord wrote:everyonejohansantana21 wrote:Does the sale of goods $500 or more require writing only when between merchants or for everyone? It's UCC section 2-201(1)?
-
thederangedwang
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:44 pm
Re: Statute of Frauds
an 0L here so obviously i might be wrong..but my understanding is that a merchants agreement is an exception to SOF..
-
Renzo
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Statute of Frauds
thederangedwang wrote:an 0L here so obviously i might be wrong..but my understanding is that a merchants agreement is an exception to SOF..
Go slam your head in the door, have a seat on the couch, and come back next year.
-
crit_racer
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Statute of Frauds
he's right...
merchants are an exception to SoF so long as a letter is sent within 10 days of the deal and it's not objected to by the offeree. There is a definition for merchants, tho, so make sure you are familiar w/ it if you are going to use this exception.
merchants are an exception to SoF so long as a letter is sent within 10 days of the deal and it's not objected to by the offeree. There is a definition for merchants, tho, so make sure you are familiar w/ it if you are going to use this exception.
-
Renzo
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Statute of Frauds
I didn't mean to imply that he was wrong, only that 0L's should find a better use of their time then studying for exams that they won't be taking.crit_racer wrote:he's right...
merchants are an exception to SoF so long as a letter is sent within 10 days of the deal and it's not objected to by the offeree. There is a definition for merchants, tho, so make sure you are familiar w/ it if you are going to use this exception.
-
thederangedwang
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:44 pm
Re: Statute of Frauds
Renzo wrote:I didn't mean to imply that he was wrong, only that 0L's should find a better use of their time then studying for exams that they won't be taking.crit_racer wrote:he's right...
merchants are an exception to SoF so long as a letter is sent within 10 days of the deal and it's not objected to by the offeree. There is a definition for merchants, tho, so make sure you are familiar w/ it if you are going to use this exception.
i was in an intro to law class for undergrad...we basically cover basic torts/contracts stuff...SOF was on the final.
-
Renzo
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Statute of Frauds
thederangedwang wrote:Renzo wrote:I didn't mean to imply that he was wrong, only that 0L's should find a better use of their time then studying for exams that they won't be taking.crit_racer wrote:he's right...
merchants are an exception to SoF so long as a letter is sent within 10 days of the deal and it's not objected to by the offeree. There is a definition for merchants, tho, so make sure you are familiar w/ it if you are going to use this exception.
i was in an intro to law class for undergrad...we basically cover basic torts/contracts stuff...SOF was on the final.
Cool. I took a CPR class once. Want to know how I would treat cancer?
Too bad, I got better shit to do with my time. And so should you.
