ITT we discuss bombing cold calls Forum
- arvcondor

- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:33 pm
ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Just finished up doing Raffles v. Wichelhaus, which if you haven't read it is one of those annoying 1860s cases from England's Court of Dandies. We read it last week and got backlogged, so I forgot what it was about, what the arguments were, and I was already having a super groggy, off day already. Our professor took mercy on me.
Tell stories about fucking up in class.
Tell stories about fucking up in class.
-
gtrwanka

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:59 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
For me its the opposite. Ill know everything about the case but in an effort to sound intelligent, ill stay the stupidest things and make half-wit connections.
-
adonai

- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:09 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Did all the readings and understood everything thoroughly, got to class an hour early, reviewed all the material multiple times, got called on, absolute silence, professor asks an easier question to give me another chance, absolute silence again.
-
TheFactor

- Posts: 789
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
nobody gives a fuck if you bomb a cold call
- MTal

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
In about 3 years, it will be you who is doing the cold calling.
-
kaiser

- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Silly MTal, everyone knows it takes more than 3 years to go into academia and become a professorMTal wrote:In about 3 years, it will be you who is doing the cold calling.
-
TheFactor

- Posts: 789
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
If worse comes to worse, I'll just pick up one of those easy-to-come-by, plush 6-figure jobs in retail management.MTal wrote:In about 3 years, it will be you who is doing the cold calling.
- Cupidity

- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Dude, you aren't contractually obligated for shit you don't know about. This isn't fucking tort law. Idiots should have had two mill shafts.arvcondor wrote:Just finished up doing Raffles v. Wichelhaus, which if you haven't read it is one of those annoying 1860s cases from England's Court of Dandies. We read it last week and got backlogged, so I forgot what it was about, what the arguments were, and I was already having a super groggy, off day already. Our professor took mercy on me.
Tell stories about fucking up in class.
I read this case like, a year ago.
- arvcondor

- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:33 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Wrong case, bud.Cupidity wrote:Dude, you aren't contractually obligated for shit you don't know about. This isn't fucking tort law. Idiots should have had two mill shafts.arvcondor wrote:Just finished up doing Raffles v. Wichelhaus, which if you haven't read it is one of those annoying 1860s cases from England's Court of Dandies. We read it last week and got backlogged, so I forgot what it was about, what the arguments were, and I was already having a super groggy, off day already. Our professor took mercy on me.
Tell stories about fucking up in class.
I read this case like, a year ago.
- birdlaw117

- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:19 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Cupidity wrote:Dude, you aren't contractually obligated for shit you don't know about. This isn't fucking tort law. Idiots should have had two mill shafts.arvcondor wrote:Just finished up doing Raffles v. Wichelhaus, which if you haven't read it is one of those annoying 1860s cases from England's Court of Dandies. We read it last week and got backlogged, so I forgot what it was about, what the arguments were, and I was already having a super groggy, off day already. Our professor took mercy on me.
Tell stories about fucking up in class.
I read this case like, a year ago.
- mths

- Posts: 1098
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:24 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
How do you confuse Hadley v. Baxendale with anything bro? Weak.arvcondor wrote:Wrong case, bud.Cupidity wrote:Dude, you aren't contractually obligated for shit you don't know about. This isn't fucking tort law. Idiots should have had two mill shafts.arvcondor wrote:Just finished up doing Raffles v. Wichelhaus, which if you haven't read it is one of those annoying 1860s cases from England's Court of Dandies. We read it last week and got backlogged, so I forgot what it was about, what the arguments were, and I was already having a super groggy, off day already. Our professor took mercy on me.
Tell stories about fucking up in class.
I read this case like, a year ago.
-
kaiser

- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Raffles v. Wichelhaus = PEERLESS!!
-
waxecstatic

- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:07 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
I thought MTal's comment was pretty clever actually.kaiser wrote:Silly MTal, everyone knows it takes more than 3 years to go into academia and become a professorMTal wrote:In about 3 years, it will be you who is doing the cold calling.
- mths

- Posts: 1098
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:24 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
No, it's peerless.kaiser wrote:Raffles v. Wichelhaus = PEERLESS!!
- okinawa

- Posts: 129
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 4:45 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
.
Last edited by okinawa on Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
dreakol

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:56 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
TheFactor wrote:nobody gives a fuck if you bomb a cold call
it's fun to look back on though, which was the point of this thread
- koalatriste

- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:08 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
how's that midterm studying going???mths wrote:No, it's peerless.kaiser wrote:Raffles v. Wichelhaus = PEERLESS!!
KOALA
- ph14

- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
I've bombed a cold call before. It sucks and is embarrassing but you just got to make the best of it and move on.
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
Nobody cares.
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
I thought you had died.Desert Fox wrote:Nobody cares.
- Kilpatrick

- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:06 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
I don't think I've ever NOT bombed a cold call. Even when I know the right answers I usually like to just answer one or two so the prof knows I read and then say "I don't know" after that so they'll move on.
- kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
If you bomb it well enough, you won't get called on again.
- OutCold

- Posts: 482
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:57 pm
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
+1. I forgot my notes in a class that had fallen slightly behind the reading. This was around week 2, and instead of just admitting that I forgot my notes, I tried to play it off like remembered the case. Crash and burn. To make matters worse, he decided to make an example of me by calling on me repeatedly that class just to hear me fumble. I have thick skin, so it really didn't bother me all that much after the initial embarrassment. I haven't been called on since, and some people in the class are on their 4th call.kalvano wrote:If you bomb it well enough, you won't get called on again.
- PHC

- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:29 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
One of my profs puts 1/3 of the class on call for an entire week and just chooses 2 people at random for each case. The day I get called on, he decides he wants to discuss my case all damn class. To make it worse, my "partner" obviously didn't do the reading. I recall saying several stupid things, but it sounded awesome compared to the other person's ramblings.
- leobowski

- Posts: 511
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:11 am
Re: ITT we discuss bombing cold calls
I got cold-called in immigration the other day.
Prof: "Mr xxx, what happened in case bla bla bla."
Me: "I apologize, I was thinking about sports, what was the question again?"
"What kind of sports."
"Well I was thinking about basketball. NBA players on an O/P visa should have to file an affadavit of support, because they all go broke within a few years."
*crickets*
Prof: "Mr xxx, what happened in case bla bla bla."
Me: "I apologize, I was thinking about sports, what was the question again?"
"What kind of sports."
"Well I was thinking about basketball. NBA players on an O/P visa should have to file an affadavit of support, because they all go broke within a few years."
*crickets*