Closed Source office memo Forum

Extension_Cord · Post by **Extension_Cord** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:19 pm

Was it the intention of the professor to give us situations where there is no clear cut predictive outcome of our issue? I have changed the predictive outcome on my memo like 10 times!

Glock · Post by **Glock** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:23 pm

Maybe. You conclusion is not the important part of the memo. The way you describe precedent cases and compare them to your facts is the important part.

kalvano · Post by **kalvano** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:27 pm

Extension_Cord wrote:Was it the intention of the professor to give us situations where there is no clear cut predictive outcome of our issue?

Yes.

DCDuck · Post by **DCDuck** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:38 pm

Welcome to law school; there is rarely a clear cut answer.

071816 · Post by **071816** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:41 pm

What would be the point of a memo (especially a memo for a law school writing class) if there was a clear cut answer to the question?

WSJ_Law · Post by **WSJ_Law** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:34 pm

chimp wrote:What would be the point of a memo (especially a memo for a law school writing class) if there was a clear cut answer to the question?

Literacy test to cross-check for TOEFL cheaters?

Closed Source office memo Forum

Closed Source office memo

Re: Closed Source office memo

Re: Closed Source office memo

Re: Closed Source office memo

Re: Closed Source office memo

Re: Closed Source office memo

Register now to search topics and post comments!