Comstock Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Charles Barkley

Bronze
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 9:56 pm

Comstock

Post by Charles Barkley » Tue May 03, 2011 3:06 am

What does this case mean in regards to the necessary and proper clause? Obviously it expands it's power. But what is the rationale behind the decision?

I can't help but agree with Scalia and Thomas' dissent..
Top
User avatar
omnomnom

New
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:18 am

Re: Comstock

Post by omnomnom » Tue May 03, 2011 10:52 am

GW Law Revue wrote:Professor, I concur with the Scalia dissent...
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”